8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Brief Educational Workshops in Secondary Schools Trial (BESST): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Secondary analysis in those with elevated symptoms of depression

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Depression and anxiety are increasingly prevalent in adolescents. The Brief Educational Workshops in Secondary Schools Trial investigated the effectiveness of a brief self-referral stress workshop programme for sixth-form students aged 16–18 years old.

          Objective

          This study conducted a secondary analysis on the outcomes of participants with elevated depressive symptoms at baseline.

          Methods

          This is an England-wide, multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a brief cognitive–behavioural therapy workshop (DISCOVER) compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU) (1:1). The primary outcome was depression symptoms (Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)) at 6-month follow-up, using the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and analysed with a multilevel linear regression estimating a between-group adjusted mean difference (aMD). Cost-effectiveness, taking a National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services perspective, was explored using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

          Findings

          Between 4 October 2021 and 10 November 2022, 900 adolescents at 57 schools were enrolled. 314 students were identified as having elevated symptoms of depression at baseline (>27 on MFQ). In this prespecified subgroup, the DISCOVER arm included 142 participants and TAU included 172. ITT analysis included 298 participants. Primary analysis at 6 months found aMD to be −3.88 (95% CI −6.48, –1.29; Cohen’s d=−0.52; p=0.003), with a similar reduction at 3 months (aMD=−4.00; 95% CI −6.58, –1.42; Cohen’s d=0.53; p=0.002), indicating a moderate, clinically meaningful effect in the DISCOVER arm. We found an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £5255 per QALY, with a probability of DISCOVER being cost-effective at between 89% and 95% compared with TAU.

          Conclusions and clinical implications

          DISCOVER is clinically effective and cost-effective in those with elevated depressive symptoms. This intervention could be used as an early school-based intervention by the NHS.

          Trial registration number

          ISRCTN90912799.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation

          Background There is increasing international interest in the concept of mental well-being and its contribution to all aspects of human life. Demand for instruments to monitor mental well-being at a population level and evaluate mental health promotion initiatives is growing. This article describes the development and validation of a new scale, comprised only of positively worded items relating to different aspects of positive mental health: the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS). Methods WEMWBS was developed by an expert panel drawing on current academic literature, qualitative research with focus groups, and psychometric testing of an existing scale. It was validated on a student and representative population sample. Content validity was assessed by reviewing the frequency of complete responses and the distribution of responses to each item. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the hypothesis that the scale measured a single construct. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Criterion validity was explored in terms of correlations between WEMWBS and other scales and by testing whether the scale discriminated between population groups in line with pre-specified hypotheses. Test-retest reliability was assessed at one week using intra-class correlation coefficients. Susceptibility to bias was measured using the Balanced Inventory of Desired Responding. Results WEMWBS showed good content validity. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the single factor hypothesis. A Cronbach's alpha score of 0.89 (student sample) and 0.91 (population sample) suggests some item redundancy in the scale. WEMWBS showed high correlations with other mental health and well-being scales and lower correlations with scales measuring overall health. Its distribution was near normal and the scale did not show ceiling effects in a population sample. It discriminated between population groups in a way that is largely consistent with the results of other population surveys. Test-retest reliability at one week was high (0.83). Social desirability bias was lower or similar to that of other comparable scales. Conclusion WEMWBS is a measure of mental well-being focusing entirely on positive aspects of mental health. As a short and psychometrically robust scale, with no ceiling effects in a population sample, it offers promise as a tool for monitoring mental well-being at a population level. Whilst WEMWBS should appeal to those evaluating mental health promotion initiatives, it is important that the scale's sensitivity to change is established before it is recommended in this context.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions.

            This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 213 school-based, universal social and emotional learning (SEL) programs involving 270,034 kindergarten through high school students. Compared to controls, SEL participants demonstrated significantly improved social and emotional skills, attitudes, behavior, and academic performance that reflected an 11-percentile-point gain in achievement. School teaching staff successfully conducted SEL programs. The use of 4 recommended practices for developing skills and the presence of implementation problems moderated program outcomes. The findings add to the growing empirical evidence regarding the positive impact of SEL programs. Policy makers, educators, and the public can contribute to healthy development of children by supporting the incorporation of evidence-based SEL programming into standard educational practice. © 2011 The Authors. Child Development © 2011 Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              EuroQol: the current state of play

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                BMJ Ment Health
                BMJ Ment Health
                bmjment
                bmjment
                BMJ Mental Health
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2755-9734
                2024
                29 August 2024
                : 27
                : 1
                : e301192
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentDepartment of Psychology , Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London , London, UK
                [2 ]departmentKing’s Clinical Trials Unit , Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London , London, UK
                [3 ]departmentDepartment of Biostatistics and Health informatics , Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London , London, UK
                [4 ]departmentHealth Service and Population Research Department , Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London , London, UK
                [5 ]departmentDepartment for Health , University of Bath , Bath, UK
                [6 ]Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families , London, UK
                [7 ]departmentFaculty of Health, Education and Society , University of Northampton , Northampton, UK
                [8 ]departmentDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology , University College London , London, UK
                [9 ]departmentDepartment of Mental Health and Social Work , Middlesex University , London, UK
                [10 ]departmentSouthwark CAMHS Clinical Academic Group , South London and Maudsley Mental Health NHS Trust , London, UK
                Author notes

                Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

                Additional supplemental material is published online only. To view, please visit the journal online ( https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301192).

                None declared.

                DrStephenLisk, Department of Psychology, King's College London, London, UK; stephen.lisk@ 123456kcl.ac.uk

                SL and KJ are joint first authors.

                BC and JB are joint senior authors.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3451-0696
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0318-8865
                Article
                bmjment-2024-301192
                10.1136/bmjment-2024-301192
                11367360
                39209761
                7954cb42-86a8-4086-b174-fd128bf3d12e
                Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 07 June 2024
                : 31 July 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: NIHR-HTA Programme;
                Award ID: NIHR127951
                Categories
                Original Research
                Child and Adolescent Mental Health
                1506

                depression & mood disorders,child & adolescent psychiatry,anxiety disorders,depression

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content122

                Most referenced authors495