10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology

      Submit here before September 30, 2024

      About Digestion: 3.0 Impact Factor I 7.9 CiteScore I 0.891 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Current Role of Portosystemic Shunt Surgery in the Management of Hepatic Venous Outflow Obstruction

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO) is a rare disorder that occurs predominantly due to a hypercoagulable state. The syndrome may result from hepatic vein obstruction, inferior vena cava obstruction or a combination of both and manifests with post-sinusoidal portal hypertension. The presentation may be fulminant with poor prognosis or as either acute, subacute or chronic forms with relatively better prognosis. Portosystemic shunt surgery (PSS) has thus far been the mainstay of treatment for HVOO. However, over the last decade, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and liver transplantation have emerged as viable options. This review aims to evaluate the available treatment options and the current relevance of PSS for the management of HVOO. Methods: A literature review on investigations and treatment was performed using Medline and additional library searches. Results: Portosystemic shunts form the mainstay of treatment for patients with subacute presentation (preserved liver function) with medically intractable ascites or recurrent variceal hemorrhage. Excellent results with 5-year survival of more than 90% have been reported from specialized centers. The main limitation for PSS is the reported perioperative mortality of 10–20% and a declining technical expertise for such surgery. Liver transplantation with disease-specific 5-year survival between 50 and 95% is presently the treatment of choice for patients with fulminant presentation, end-stage liver disease (ESLD), unshuntable anatomy or decompensation after PSS. TIPS may be preferable for sick patients with acute presentation with isolated hepatic vein thrombosis or as a temporizing measure for those with ESLD awaiting transplantation. The drawback of TIPS is late shunt dysfunction that occurs in more than 50% of patients at 1 year. Conclusions: Due to rarity of the disorder there is a lack of trials comparing the different treatment modalities. Hence, the current treatment recommendations are based on retrospective studies. In a select group of HVOO patients (subacute presentation with preserved liver function), PSS remains the treatment of choice with excellent long-term results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cause of portal or hepatic venous thrombosis in adults: the role of multiple concurrent factors.

          According to a recent hypothesis, venous thrombosis results from the concurrence of several factors. This hypothesis was assessed in patients with portal or hepatic venous thrombosis by simultaneously investigating most of the currently identified prothrombotic disorders, local precipitating factors, and other risk factors such as oral contraceptive use. Patients with a tumorous obstruction and patients with cirrhosis with portal vein thrombosis were excluded. The prothrombotic disorders that were investigated included classical and occult myeloproliferative disorders; antiphospholipid syndrome; protein C; protein S and antithrombin deficiency; factor V Leiden; factor II; and methylene-tetrahydrofolate-reductase gene mutations. We found 1 or several prothrombotic disorders and a local precipitating factor in 26 and 10 of the 36 patients with portal vein thrombosis, respectively; and in 28 and none of the 32 patients with hepatic vein thrombosis, respectively. We found a combination of prothrombotic disorders in 5 and 9 patients with portal and hepatic vein thrombosis, respectively, whereas such a combination is expected in less than 1% of asymptomatic subjects. Of the 10 patients with a local precipitating factor, 8 had a prothrombotic disorder. Of the 13 patients who use oral contraceptives, 10 had a prothrombotic disorder. We conclude that portal or hepatic venous thrombosis should be regarded as an index for 1 or several prothrombotic disorders, whether or not local precipitating factors or oral contraceptive use are found. Concurrence of prothrombotic disorders is more common than expected. Extensive investigation of prothrombotic disorders and anticoagulation should be considered in patients with portal or hepatic venous thrombosis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Budd-Chiari syndrome.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Budd-Chiari syndrome: a review by an expert panel.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                DSU
                Dig Surg
                10.1159/issn.0253-4886
                Digestive Surgery
                S. Karger AG
                0253-4886
                1421-9883
                2006
                February 2007
                02 February 2007
                : 23
                : 5-6
                : 358-369
                Affiliations
                aDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and bDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
                Article
                97897 Dig Surg 2006;23:358–369
                10.1159/000097897
                17164547
                794e10ed-432e-45f6-9f13-77eb61ae2f43
                © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 12 June 2006
                : 20 September 2006
                Page count
                Tables: 7, References: 75, Pages: 12
                Categories
                Review

                Oncology & Radiotherapy,Gastroenterology & Hepatology,Surgery,Nutrition & Dietetics,Internal medicine
                Angioplasty,Portosystemic shunts,Hepatic vein thrombosis,Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt,Budd-Chiari syndrome,Shunts

                Comments

                Comment on this article