5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Art or Artifact: Evaluating the Accuracy, Appeal, and Educational Value of AI-Generated Imagery in DALL·E 3 for Illustrating Congenital Heart Diseases.

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 4 , 6 , 4 , 7 , 4 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 4 , 8 , 8 , 8 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 4 , 8 , 4 , 17
      Journal of medical systems
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC
      AI text-to-image generator, AI-generated imagery, Anatomical accuracy, Congenital heart diseases, DALL·E 3 and medical education, Healthcare professional visual perceptions, Medical illustrations and chatGPT integration, medical artificial intelligence

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly AI-Generated Imagery, has the potential to impact medical and patient education. This research explores the use of AI-generated imagery, from text-to-images, in medical education, focusing on congenital heart diseases (CHD). Utilizing ChatGPT's DALL·E 3, the research aims to assess the accuracy and educational value of AI-created images for 20 common CHDs. In this study, we utilized DALL·E 3 to generate a comprehensive set of 110 images, comprising ten images depicting the normal human heart and five images for each of the 20 common CHDs. The generated images were evaluated by a diverse group of 33 healthcare professionals. This cohort included cardiology experts, pediatricians, non-pediatric faculty members, trainees (medical students, interns, pediatric residents), and pediatric nurses. Utilizing a structured framework, these professionals assessed each image for anatomical accuracy, the usefulness of in-picture text, its appeal to medical professionals, and the image's potential applicability in medical presentations. Each item was assessed on a Likert scale of three. The assessments produced a total of 3630 images' assessments. Most AI-generated cardiac images were rated poorly as follows: 80.8% of images were rated as anatomically incorrect or fabricated, 85.2% rated to have incorrect text labels, 78.1% rated as not usable for medical education. The nurses and medical interns were found to have a more positive perception about the AI-generated cardiac images compared to the faculty members, pediatricians, and cardiology experts. Complex congenital anomalies were found to be significantly more predicted to anatomical fabrication compared to simple cardiac anomalies. There were significant challenges identified in image generation. Based on our findings, we recommend a vigilant approach towards the use of AI-generated imagery in medical education at present, underscoring the imperative for thorough validation and the importance of collaboration across disciplines. While we advise against its immediate integration until further validations are conducted, the study advocates for future AI-models to be fine-tuned with accurate medical data, enhancing their reliability and educational utility.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Med Syst
          Journal of medical systems
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1573-689X
          0148-5598
          May 23 2024
          : 48
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. mtemsah@ksu.edu.sa.
          [2 ] Pediatric Department, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. mtemsah@ksu.edu.sa.
          [3 ] Evidence-Based Health Care & Knowledge Translation Research Chair, Family & Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, 11362, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. mtemsah@ksu.edu.sa.
          [4 ] College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
          [5 ] Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Cardiac Science Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, 11362, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
          [6 ] Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
          [7 ] Critical Care Department, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
          [8 ] Pediatric Department, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
          [9 ] Kidney & Pancreas Health Center, Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
          [10 ] Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
          [11 ] Evidence-Based Health Care & Knowledge Translation Research Chair, Family & Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, 11362, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
          [12 ] Department of Family and Community Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, 11362, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
          [13 ] Health Information Management Department, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Al Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
          [14 ] Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
          [15 ] Research Institute for Medical and Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
          [16 ] Center of Excellence in Information Assurance, King Saud University, 11653, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
          [17 ] Department of Cardiac Science, King Fahad Cardiac Center, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
          Article
          10.1007/s10916-024-02072-0
          10.1007/s10916-024-02072-0
          38780839
          791460f3-d8d9-4df7-8b1b-c1bb18380747
          History

          Anatomical accuracy,AI text-to-image generator,Medical illustrations and chatGPT integration, medical artificial intelligence,Healthcare professional visual perceptions,DALL·E 3 and medical education,Congenital heart diseases,AI-generated imagery

          Comments

          Comment on this article