7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Better living through conifer removal: A demographic analysis of sage-grouse vital rates

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sagebrush ( Artemisia spp.) obligate wildlife species such as the imperiled greater sage-grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus) face numerous threats including altered ecosystem processes that have led to conifer expansion into shrub-steppe. Conifer removal is accelerating despite a lack of empirical evidence on grouse population response. Using a before-after-control-impact design at the landscape scale, we evaluated effects of conifer removal on two important demographic parameters, annual survival of females and nest survival, by monitoring 219 female sage-grouse and 225 nests in the northern Great Basin from 2010 to 2014. Estimates from the best treatment models showed positive trends in the treatment area relative to the control area resulting in an increase of 6.6% annual female survival and 18.8% nest survival relative to the control area by 2014. Using stochastic simulations of our estimates and published demographics, we estimated a 25% increase in the population growth rate in the treatment area relative to the control area. This is the first study to link sage-grouse demographics with conifer removal and supports recommendations to actively manage conifer expansion for sage-grouse conservation. Sage-grouse have become a primary catalyst for conservation funding to address conifer expansion in the West, and these findings have important implications for other ecosystem services being generated on the wings of species conservation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Uninformative Parameters and Model Selection Using Akaike's Information Criterion

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Toward an Era of Restoration in Ecology: Successes, Failures, and Opportunities Ahead

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Effect of Edge on Avian Nest Success: How Strong Is the Evidence?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                23 March 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 3
                : e0174347
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America
                [2 ]Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Bend, Oregon, United States of America
                [3 ]Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America
                [4 ]United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Redmond, Oregon, United States of America
                [5 ]Lakeview District, Bureau of Land Management, Lakeview, Oregon, United States of America
                Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, INDIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: JS CH JM DN JF KR.

                • Data curation: JS JF.

                • Formal analysis: JS CH JT.

                • Funding acquisition: JS JF DN KR.

                • Investigation: JS JF.

                • Methodology: JS CH JT.

                • Project administration: JS JF.

                • Resources: JS JF DN KR.

                • Software: JS CH JT.

                • Supervision: JS CH JM JF DN KR.

                • Validation: JS CH.

                • Visualization: JS CH JM.

                • Writing – original draft: JS.

                • Writing – review & editing: JS CH JT JM JF DN KR.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1754-6689
                Article
                PONE-D-16-27465
                10.1371/journal.pone.0174347
                5363946
                28333995
                78265bf2-5517-496e-8457-39cd1a6a5de3

                This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

                History
                : 9 July 2016
                : 7 March 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Pages: 17
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007149, U.S. Bureau of Land Management;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009171, Natural Resources Conservation Service;
                Award Recipient :
                This study was funded by the US Bureau of Land Management and the US Natural Resources Conservation Service through the Conservation Effects Assessment Project and the Sage Grouse Initiative. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Plants
                Trees
                Conifers
                People and Places
                Demography
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Plants
                Trees
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Population Biology
                Population Metrics
                Population Growth
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Birds
                Earth Sciences
                Seasons
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Conservation Science
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Animal Types
                Wildlife
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animal Types
                Wildlife
                Custom metadata
                Data have been provided in supporting information.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article