25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sequential immunotherapy and targeted therapy for metastatic BRAF V600 mutated melanoma: 4-year survival and biomarkers evaluation from the phase II SECOMBIT trial

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 3 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 21 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 26 , 1 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 4 , 2
      Nature Communications
      Nature Publishing Group UK
      Melanoma, Melanoma, Tumour biomarkers

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          No prospective data were available prior to 2021 to inform selection between combination BRAF and MEK inhibition versus dual blockade of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) as first-line treatment options for BRAFV600-mutant melanoma. SECOMBIT (NCT02631447) was a randomized, three-arm, noncomparative phase II trial in which patients were randomized to one of two sequences with immunotherapy or targeted therapy first, with a third arm in which an 8-week induction course of targeted therapy followed by a planned switch to immunotherapy was the first treatment. BRAF/MEK inhibitors were encorafenib plus binimetinib and checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab plus nivolumab. Primary outcome of overall survival was previously reported, demonstrating improved survival with immunotherapy administered until progression and followed by BRAF/MEK inhibition. Here we report 4-year survival outcomes, confirming long-term benefit with first-line immunotherapy. We also describe preliminary results of predefined biomarkers analyses that identify a trend toward improved 4-year overall survival and total progression-free survival in patients with loss-of-function mutations affecting JAK or low baseline levels of serum interferon gamma (IFNy). These long-term survival outcomes confirm immunotherapy as the preferred first-line treatment approach for most patients with BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma, and the biomarker analyses are hypothesis-generating for future investigations of predictors of durable benefit with dual checkpoint blockade and targeted therapy.

          Abstract

          SECOMBIT was a clinical trial testing different sequences of immunotherapy (ipilimumab plus nivolumab) and targeted therapy (encorafenib plus binimetinib) for untreated BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. Here the authors report 4-year survival outcomes, confirming long-term benefit with first-line immunotherapy, and preliminary biomarkers evaluation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

          Assessment of the change in tumour burden is an important feature of the clinical evaluation of cancer therapeutics: both tumour shrinkage (objective response) and disease progression are useful endpoints in clinical trials. Since RECIST was published in 2000, many investigators, cooperative groups, industry and government authorities have adopted these criteria in the assessment of treatment outcomes. However, a number of questions and issues have arisen which have led to the development of a revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Evidence for changes, summarised in separate papers in this special issue, has come from assessment of a large data warehouse (>6500 patients), simulation studies and literature reviews. HIGHLIGHTS OF REVISED RECIST 1.1: Major changes include: Number of lesions to be assessed: based on evidence from numerous trial databases merged into a data warehouse for analysis purposes, the number of lesions required to assess tumour burden for response determination has been reduced from a maximum of 10 to a maximum of five total (and from five to two per organ, maximum). Assessment of pathological lymph nodes is now incorporated: nodes with a short axis of 15 mm are considered measurable and assessable as target lesions. The short axis measurement should be included in the sum of lesions in calculation of tumour response. Nodes that shrink to <10mm short axis are considered normal. Confirmation of response is required for trials with response primary endpoint but is no longer required in randomised studies since the control arm serves as appropriate means of interpretation of data. Disease progression is clarified in several aspects: in addition to the previous definition of progression in target disease of 20% increase in sum, a 5mm absolute increase is now required as well to guard against over calling PD when the total sum is very small. Furthermore, there is guidance offered on what constitutes 'unequivocal progression' of non-measurable/non-target disease, a source of confusion in the original RECIST guideline. Finally, a section on detection of new lesions, including the interpretation of FDG-PET scan assessment is included. Imaging guidance: the revised RECIST includes a new imaging appendix with updated recommendations on the optimal anatomical assessment of lesions. A key question considered by the RECIST Working Group in developing RECIST 1.1 was whether it was appropriate to move from anatomic unidimensional assessment of tumour burden to either volumetric anatomical assessment or to functional assessment with PET or MRI. It was concluded that, at present, there is not sufficient standardisation or evidence to abandon anatomical assessment of tumour burden. The only exception to this is in the use of FDG-PET imaging as an adjunct to determination of progression. As is detailed in the final paper in this special issue, the use of these promising newer approaches requires appropriate clinical validation studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma

            New England Journal of Medicine, 373(1), 23-34
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Five-Year Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                p.ascierto@istitutotumori.na.it
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                2 January 2024
                2 January 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 146
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics. I.N.T. IRCCS Fondazione “G. Pascale”, Napoli, Italy
                [2 ]Immuno-Oncology & Targeted Cancer Biotherapies, University of Sassari - Unit of Cancer Genetics, IRGB-CNR, ( https://ror.org/01bnjbv91) 07100 Sassari, Italy
                [3 ]GRID grid.419563.c, ISNI 0000 0004 1755 9177, Immunotherapy, Cell Therapy Unit and Biobank Unit, , IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, ; Meldola, Italy
                [4 ]GRID grid.419546.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1808 1697, Melanoma Oncology Unit, , Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, ; Padova, Italy
                [5 ]Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, ( https://ror.org/01bnjbv91) Sassari, Italy
                [6 ]University of Perugia, ( https://ror.org/00x27da85) Perugia, Italy
                [7 ]GRID grid.460094.f, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 8431, Department of Oncology and Haematology, , Papa Giovanni XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, ; Bergamo, Italy
                [8 ]Biotherapy of Tumors Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, ( https://ror.org/02vr0ne26) Milan, Italy
                [9 ]Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 –, ( https://ror.org/04qcjsm24) Warsaw, Poland
                [10 ]GRID grid.417520.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1760 5276, Department of Medical Oncology 1, , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, ; Rome, Italy
                [11 ]GRID grid.410458.c, ISNI 0000 0000 9635 9413, Department of Medical Oncology, , Hospital Clínic Barcelona, ; 08036 Barcelona, Spain
                [12 ]Rare Tumors and Melanoma Unit, IRCCS Istituto dei Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
                [13 ]GRID grid.413503.0, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 9135, Oncology Unit, , Foundation IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, ; San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
                [14 ]First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ( https://ror.org/04gnjpq42) Athens, Greece
                [15 ]Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, ( https://ror.org/02n0bts35) Graz, Austria
                [16 ]Department of Medical Sciences, Dermatologic Clinic, University of Turin, ( https://ror.org/048tbm396) Turin, Italy
                [17 ]GRID grid.508487.6, ISNI 0000 0004 7885 7602, Dermato-Oncology and CIC AP-HP Hôpital Saint Louis,Cancer Institute APHP. Nord-Université Paris Cite F-75010, ; Paris, INSERM U976 France
                [18 ]Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital Solna, ( https://ror.org/056d84691) Stockholm, Sweden
                [19 ]Skin Cancer Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, ( https://ror.org/04d7es448) Genova, Italy
                [20 ]Division of melanoma Sarcoma and Rare Tumors, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology, ( https://ror.org/02vr0ne26) Milan, Italy
                [21 ]Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Oncology Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, ( https://ror.org/027ynra39) Bari, Italy
                [22 ]Unit of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, ( https://ror.org/05dwj7825) Milan, Italy
                [23 ]Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
                [24 ]Academic Hospital “Santa Maria della Misericordia”, Udine, Italy
                [25 ]Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, ( https://ror.org/05290cv24) Naples, Italy
                [26 ]Department of Immunology and Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, ( https://ror.org/03phm3r45) Pamplona, Spain
                [27 ]Medical Oncology Unit, AORN San Pio, Benevento, Italy
                [28 ]Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS – Facility of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, ( https://ror.org/00rg70c39) Rome, Italy
                [29 ]Department of Dermatology, University and University Hospital Zurich, ( https://ror.org/01462r250) Zurich, Switzerland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-475X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6551-0189
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8846-8959
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6255-5851
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7703-790X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8920-5429
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2896-1957
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5854-7290
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3791-540X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7295-6074
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1081-5313
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1360-348X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2279-6906
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9191-9124
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4350-2276
                Article
                44475
                10.1038/s41467-023-44475-6
                10761671
                38167503
                77ef9228-6ac5-443f-87cb-7ccaa0b0a081
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 15 May 2023
                : 14 December 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: This study was supported by unconditioned grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb (Princeton, NJ) and Array Biopharma Inc./Pfizer (Boulder, CO).
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2024

                Uncategorized
                melanoma,tumour biomarkers
                Uncategorized
                melanoma, tumour biomarkers

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content255

                Cited by11

                Most referenced authors1,211