57
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Decisional Conflict Regarding Disease-Modifying Treatment Choices Among Patients with Mid-Stage Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Shared decision-making is critical in multiple sclerosis (MS) due to the uncertainty of the disease trajectory over time and the large number of treatment options with differing efficacy, safety and administration characteristics. The aim of this study was to assess patients’ decisional conflict regarding the choice of a disease-modifying therapy and its associated factors in patients with mid-stage relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

          Methods

          A multicenter, non-interventional study was conducted. Adult patients with a diagnosis of RRMS (2017 revised McDonald criteria) and disease duration of 3 to 8 years were included. The level of uncertainty experienced by a patient when faced with making a treatment choice was assessed using the 4-item Decisional Conflict Scale. A battery of patient-reported and clinician-rated measures was administered to obtain information on symptom severity, illness perception, illness-related uncertainty, regret, MS knowledge, risk taking behavior, preferred role in the decision-making process, cognition, and self-management. Patients were recruited during routine follow-up visits and completed all questionnaires online using electronic tablets at the hospital. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted.

          Results

          A total of 201 patients were studied. Mean age (Standard deviation) was 38.7 (8.4) years and 74.1% were female. Median disease duration (Interquartile range) was 6.0 (4.0–7.0) years. Median EDSS score was 1.0 (0–2.0). Sixty-seven (33.3%) patients reported a decisional conflict. These patients had lower MS knowledge and more illness uncertainty, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, subjective symptom severity, a threatening illness perception, and poorer quality of life than their counterparts. Lack of decisional conflict was associated with MS knowledge (Odds ratio [OR]=1.195, 95% CI 1.045, 1.383, p=0.013), self-management (OR=1.049, 95% CI 1.013, 1.093, p=0.018), and regret after a healthcare decision (OR=0.860, 95% CI 0.756, 0.973, p=0.018) in the multivariate analysis.

          Conclusion

          Decisional conflict regarding the selection of a disease-modifying therapy was a common phenomenon in patients with mid-stage RRMS. Identifying factors associated with decisional conflict may be useful to implement preventive strategies that help patients better understand their condition and strengthen their self-management resources.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

          A self-assessment scale has been developed and found to be a reliable instrument for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of an hospital medical outpatient clinic. The anxiety and depressive subscales are also valid measures of severity of the emotional disorder. It is suggested that the introduction of the scales into general hospital practice would facilitate the large task of detection and management of emotional disorder in patients under investigation and treatment in medical and surgical departments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria

            The 2010 McDonald criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis are widely used in research and clinical practice. Scientific advances in the past 7 years suggest that they might no longer provide the most up-to-date guidance for clinicians and researchers. The International Panel on Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis reviewed the 2010 McDonald criteria and recommended revisions. The 2017 McDonald criteria continue to apply primarily to patients experiencing a typical clinically isolated syndrome, define what is needed to fulfil dissemination in time and space of lesions in the CNS, and stress the need for no better explanation for the presentation. The following changes were made: in patients with a typical clinically isolated syndrome and clinical or MRI demonstration of dissemination in space, the presence of CSF-specific oligoclonal bands allows a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis; symptomatic lesions can be used to demonstrate dissemination in space or time in patients with supratentorial, infratentorial, or spinal cord syndrome; and cortical lesions can be used to demonstrate dissemination in space. Research to further refine the criteria should focus on optic nerve involvement, validation in diverse populations, and incorporation of advanced imaging, neurophysiological, and body fluid markers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review

              Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune-mediated neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system characterized by inflammatory demyelination with axonal transection. MS affects an estimated 900 000 people in the US. MS typically presents in young adults (mean age of onset, 20-30 years) and can lead to physical disability, cognitive impairment, and decreased quality of life. This review summarizes current evidence regarding diagnosis and treatment of MS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Patient Prefer Adherence
                Patient Prefer Adherence
                ppa
                Patient preference and adherence
                Dove
                1177-889X
                07 June 2024
                2024
                : 18
                : 1163-1171
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro , Madrid, Spain
                [2 ]Medical Department, Roche Farma , Madrid, Spain
                [3 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet , Zaragoza, Spain
                [4 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Rafael Méndez , Lorca, Spain
                [5 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Cecilio , Granada, Spain
                [6 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga , Málaga, Spain
                [7 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital de Galdakao-Usansolo , Galdakao, Spain
                [8 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón , Alcorcón, Spain
                [9 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti , Lugo, Spain
                [10 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara , Cáceres, Spain
                [11 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena , Sevilla, Spain
                [12 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria , Tenerife, Spain
                [13 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Son Espases , Palma de Mallorca, Spain
                [14 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Albacete , Albacete, Spain
                [15 ]Department of Neurology, Fundació Salut Empordà , Figueres, Spain
                [16 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz , Madrid, Spain
                [17 ]Department of Neurology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña , A Coruña, Spain
                [18 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova , Llíria, Spain
                [19 ]Department of Neurology, Complejo Asistencial de Segovia , Segovia, Spain
                [20 ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía , Córdoba, Spain
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Jorge Maurino, Ribera del Loira 50, Madrid, 28042, Spain, Tel + 34 913 24 81 00, Email jorge.maurino@roche.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9978-0198
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8587-8303
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5957-0046
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1359-0903
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8732-8409
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9858-3555
                Article
                459242
                10.2147/PPA.S459242
                11166147
                38863945
                778b137a-dda8-49df-a2ad-6a6a8fa18822
                © 2024 Sabin et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 12 January 2024
                : 23 May 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, References: 50, Pages: 9
                Funding
                Funded by: Roche Farma Medical Department, Spain;
                This study was funded by Roche Farma Medical Department, Spain (ML43469). The funding source had no role in the design, analysis and interpretation of the data, review or approval of the manuscript, or in the decision to submit for publication.
                Categories
                Original Research

                Medicine
                multiple sclerosis,disease-modifying therapies,decision-making,decisional conflict,disease-related knowledge,self-management

                Comments

                Comment on this article