3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predictive model to identify multiple failure to biological therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Despite advances in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the wide range of therapies available, there is a percentage of patients whose treatment presents a challenge for clinicians due to lack of response to multiple biologic and target-specific disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs).

          Objective:

          To develop and validate an algorithm to predict multiple failure to biological therapy in patients with RA.

          Design:

          Observational retrospective study involving subjects from a cohort of patients with RA receiving b/tsDMARDs.

          Methods:

          Based on the number of prior failures to b/tsDMARDs, patients were classified as either multi-refractory (MR) or non-refractory (NR). Patient characteristics were considered in the statistical analysis to design the predictive model, selecting those variables with a predictive capability. A decision algorithm known as ‘classification and regression tree’ (CART) was developed to create a prediction model of multi-drug resistance. Performance of the prediction algorithm was evaluated in an external independent cohort using area under the curve (AUC).

          Results:

          A total of 136 patients were included: 51 MR and 85 NR. The CART model was able to predict multiple failures to b/tsDMARDs using disease activity score-28 (DAS-28) values at 6 months after the start time of the initial b/tsDMARD, as well as DAS-28 improvement in the first 6 months and baseline DAS-28. The CART model showed a capability to correctly classify 94.1% NR and 87.5% MR patients with a sensitivity = 0.88, a specificity = 0.94, and an AUC = 0.89 (95% CI: 0.74–1.00). In the external validation cohort, 35 MR and 47 NR patients were included. The AUC value for the CART model in this cohort was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73–0.9).

          Conclusion:

          Our model correctly classified NR and MR patients based on simple measurements available in routine clinical practice, which provides the possibility to characterize and individualize patient treatments during early stages.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

          Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover 3 main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors, to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all 3 study designs and 4 are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available at http://www.annals.org and on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative.

            The 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR; formerly, the American Rheumatism Association) classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been criticized for their lack of sensitivity in early disease. This work was undertaken to develop new classification criteria for RA. A joint working group from the ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism developed, in 3 phases, a new approach to classifying RA. The work focused on identifying, among patients newly presenting with undifferentiated inflammatory synovitis, factors that best discriminated between those who were and those who were not at high risk for persistent and/or erosive disease--this being the appropriate current paradigm underlying the disease construct "rheumatoid arthritis." In the new criteria set, classification as "definite RA" is based on the confirmed presence of synovitis in at least 1 joint, absence of an alternative diagnosis that better explains the synovitis, and achievement of a total score of 6 or greater (of a possible 10) from the individual scores in 4 domains: number and site of involved joints (score range 0-5), serologic abnormality (score range 0-3), elevated acute-phase response (score range 0-1), and symptom duration (2 levels; range 0-1). This new classification system redefines the current paradigm of RA by focusing on features at earlier stages of disease that are associated with persistent and/or erosive disease, rather than defining the disease by its late-stage features. This will refocus attention on the important need for earlier diagnosis and institution of effective disease-suppressing therapy to prevent or minimize the occurrence of the undesirable sequelae that currently comprise the paradigm underlying the disease construct "rheumatoid arthritis."
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rheumatoid arthritis.

              Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory joint disease, which can cause cartilage and bone damage as well as disability. Early diagnosis is key to optimal therapeutic success, particularly in patients with well-characterised risk factors for poor outcomes such as high disease activity, presence of autoantibodies, and early joint damage. Treatment algorithms involve measuring disease activity with composite indices, applying a treatment-to-target strategy, and use of conventional, biological, and newz non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. After the treatment target of stringent remission (or at least low disease activity) is maintained, dose reduction should be attempted. Although the prospects for most patients are now favourable, many still do not respond to current therapies. Accordingly, new therapies are urgently required. In this Seminar, we describe current insights into genetics and aetiology, pathophysiology, epidemiology, assessment, therapeutic agents, and treatment strategies together with unmet needs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing - original draft
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Resources
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: ResourcesRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ResourcesRole: Supervision
                Role: ResourcesRole: Supervision
                Role: ResourcesRole: Supervision
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing - review & editing
                Journal
                Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis
                Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis
                TAB
                sptab
                Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1759-720X
                1759-7218
                6 October 2022
                2022
                : 14
                : 1759720X221124028
                Affiliations
                [1-1759720X221124028]Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana, 28046, Madrid, Spain
                [2-1759720X221124028]Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
                [3-1759720X221124028]Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
                [4-1759720X221124028]Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
                [5-1759720X221124028]Biostatistics Unit, IdiPAZ, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
                [6-1759720X221124028]Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
                [7-1759720X221124028]Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
                [8-1759720X221124028]Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
                [9-1759720X221124028]Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
                [10-1759720X221124028]Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
                [11-1759720X221124028]Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
                Author notes
                [*]

                These authors share the senior authorship.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2200-0859
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9119-5330
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8864-3806
                Article
                10.1177_1759720X221124028
                10.1177/1759720X221124028
                9549195
                36226311
                77714706-b887-4002-9b13-d59d3b6f4d21
                © The Author(s), 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 5 April 2022
                : 16 August 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: fundación española de reumatología, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100019158;
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2022
                ts1

                b/tsdmards,difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis,refractory rheumatoid arthritis

                Comments

                Comment on this article