14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Genotypic Diversity among Campylobacter jejuni Isolates in a Commercial Broiler Flock.

      Applied and Environmental Microbiology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Analysis of nucleic acid polymorphism in the flagellin genes of Campylobacter jejuni was used to investigate genetic diversity among Campylobacter spp. in a commercial broiler flock. Three hundred single colonies of C. jejuni were isolated from fecal samples collected weekly for 3 weeks immediately before slaughter. Both the flaA and flaB genes were amplified by PCR, and the PCR product was digested with the restriction enzyme AluI. The fragments generated were then analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Among the 300 recovered isolates, five different restriction fragment length polymorphism profiles were observed. Three of these profiles were dominant during the course of the study, and the other two profiles were detected at low frequency. Analysis of genetic variation in C. jejuni over the course of an experimental infection lasting 7 weeks indicated that there was no obvious drift in the flagellin gene type. These findings demonstrate that a range of bacterial genotypes can constitute the bacterial population within a commercial poultry flock, with the most likely sources of these types being multiple environmental exposure and/or genetic drift within the population. This degree of diversity must be considered in epidemiological analyses which utilize genetic typing methods that investigate Campylobacter contamination of any food source, including poultry, to ensure that the total gene pool for C. jejuni is evaluated.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          16535602
          1389157
          10.1128/aem.63.5.1874-1877.1997

          Comments

          Comment on this article