9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Effects of Long Duration Spaceflight on Sensorimotor Control and Cognition

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Astronauts returning from spaceflight typically show transient declines in mobility and balance. Other sensorimotor behaviors and cognitive function have not been investigated as much. Here, we tested whether spaceflight affects performance on various sensorimotor and cognitive tasks during and after missions to the International Space Station (ISS). We obtained mobility (Functional Mobility Test), balance (Sensory Organization Test-5), bimanual coordination (bimanual Purdue Pegboard), cognitive-motor dual-tasking and various other cognitive measures (Digit Symbol Substitution Test, Cube Rotation, Card Rotation, Rod and Frame Test) before, during and after 15 astronauts completed 6 month missions aboard the ISS. We used linear mixed effect models to analyze performance changes due to entering the microgravity environment, behavioral adaptations aboard the ISS and subsequent recovery from microgravity. We observed declines in mobility and balance from pre- to post-flight, suggesting disruption and/or down weighting of vestibular inputs; these behaviors recovered to baseline levels within 30 days post-flight. We also identified bimanual coordination declines from pre- to post-flight and recovery to baseline levels within 30 days post-flight. There were no changes in dual-task performance during or following spaceflight. Cube rotation response time significantly improved from pre- to post-flight, suggestive of practice effects. There was also a trend for better in-flight cube rotation performance on the ISS when crewmembers had their feet in foot loops on the “floor” throughout the task. This suggests that tactile inputs to the foot sole aided orientation. Overall, these results suggest that sensory reweighting due to the microgravity environment of spaceflight affected sensorimotor performance, while cognitive performance was maintained. A shift from exocentric (gravity) spatial references on Earth toward an egocentric spatial reference may also occur aboard the ISS. Upon return to Earth, microgravity adaptions become maladaptive for certain postural tasks, resulting in transient sensorimotor performance declines that recover within 30 days.

          Related collections

          Most cited references81

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The NASA Twins Study: A multidimensional analysis of a year-long human spaceflight.

            To understand the health impact of long-duration spaceflight, one identical twin astronaut was monitored before, during, and after a 1-year mission onboard the International Space Station; his twin served as a genetically matched ground control. Longitudinal assessments identified spaceflight-specific changes, including decreased body mass, telomere elongation, genome instability, carotid artery distension and increased intima-media thickness, altered ocular structure, transcriptional and metabolic changes, DNA methylation changes in immune and oxidative stress-related pathways, gastrointestinal microbiota alterations, and some cognitive decline postflight. Although average telomere length, global gene expression, and microbiome changes returned to near preflight levels within 6 months after return to Earth, increased numbers of short telomeres were observed and expression of some genes was still disrupted. These multiomic, molecular, physiological, and behavioral datasets provide a valuable roadmap of the putative health risks for future human spaceflight.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Motor control and aging: links to age-related brain structural, functional, and biochemical effects.

              Although connections between cognitive deficits and age-associated brain differences have been elucidated, relationships with motor performance are less well understood. Here, we broadly review age-related brain differences and motor deficits in older adults in addition to cognition-action theories. Age-related atrophy of the motor cortical regions and corpus callosum may precipitate or coincide with motor declines such as balance and gait deficits, coordination deficits, and movement slowing. Correspondingly, degeneration of neurotransmitter systems-primarily the dopaminergic system-may contribute to age-related gross and fine motor declines, as well as to higher cognitive deficits. In general, older adults exhibit involvement of more widespread brain regions for motor control than young adults, particularly the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia networks. Unfortunately these same regions are the most vulnerable to age-related effects, resulting in an imbalance of "supply and demand". Existing exercise, pharmaceutical, and motor training interventions may ameliorate motor deficits in older adults. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neural Circuits
                Front Neural Circuits
                Front. Neural Circuits
                Frontiers in Neural Circuits
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5110
                26 October 2021
                2021
                : 15
                : 723504
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Applied Physiology & Kinesiology, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL, United States
                [2] 2KBR, Inc. , Houston, TX, United States
                [3] 3Department of Psychology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, United States
                [4] 4NASA Johnson Space Center , Houston, TX, United States
                [5] 5Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Raffaella Ricci, University of Turin, Italy

                Reviewed by: Rodrigo Suárez, The University of Queensland, Australia; Anna Maria Berti, University of Turin, Italy

                *Correspondence: Rachael D. Seidler, rachaelseidler@ 123456ufl.edu
                Article
                10.3389/fncir.2021.723504
                8577506
                34764856
                764feb13-66c9-4442-875a-6ed44c620e15
                Copyright © 2021 Tays, Hupfeld, McGregor, Salazar, De Dios, Beltran, Reuter-Lorenz, Kofman, Wood, Bloomberg, Mulavara and Seidler.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 10 June 2021
                : 22 September 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 83, Pages: 14, Words: 12386
                Funding
                Funded by: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, doi 10.13039/100000104;
                Categories
                Neural Circuits
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                spaceflight,balance,mobility,cognition,sensorimotor,microgravity
                Neurosciences
                spaceflight, balance, mobility, cognition, sensorimotor, microgravity

                Comments

                Comment on this article