61
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A high-risk, Double-Hit, group of newly diagnosed myeloma identified by genomic analysis

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 5 , 5 , 5 , 7 , 7 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 4 , 4 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 4 , 21 , 22 , 4 , 5 , 1 ,
      Leukemia
      Nature Publishing Group UK

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) with high-risk disease are in need of new treatment strategies to improve the outcomes. Multiple clinical, cytogenetic, or gene expression features have been used to identify high-risk patients, each of which has significant weaknesses. Inclusion of molecular features into risk stratification could resolve the current challenges. In a genome-wide analysis of the largest set of molecular and clinical data established to date from NDMM, as part of the Myeloma Genome Project, we have defined DNA drivers of aggressive clinical behavior. Whole-genome and exome data from 1273 NDMM patients identified genetic factors that contribute significantly to progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (cumulative R 2 = 18.4% and 25.2%, respectively). Integrating DNA drivers and clinical data into a Cox model using 784 patients with ISS, age, PFS, OS, and genomic data, the model has a cumlative R 2 of 34.3% for PFS and 46.5% for OS. A high-risk subgroup was defined by recursive partitioning using either a) bi-allelic TP53 inactivation or b) amplification (≥4 copies) of CKS1B (1q21) on the background of International Staging System III, comprising 6.1% of the population (median PFS = 15.4 months; OS = 20.7 months) that was validated in an independent dataset. Double-Hit patients have a dire prognosis despite modern therapies and should be considered for novel therapeutic approaches.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          p53 mutations in human cancers

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cyclin D dysregulation: an early and unifying pathogenic event in multiple myeloma.

            Two oncogenic pathways have been hypothesized for multiple myeloma (MM) and premalignant monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) tumors: a nonhyperdiploid pathway associated with a high prevalence of IgH translocations and a hyperdiploid pathway associated with multiple trisomies of 8 chromosomes. Cyclin D1, D2, or D3 expression appears to be increased and/or dysregulated in virtually all MM tumors despite their low proliferative capacity. Translocations can directly dysregulate CCND1 (11q13) or CCND3 (6p21), or MAF (16q23) or MAFB (20q11) transcription factors that target CCND2. Biallelic dysregulation of CCND1 occurs in nearly 40% of tumors, most of which are hyperdiploid. Other tumors express increased CCND2, either with or without a t(4;14) translocation. Using gene expression profiling to identify 5 recurrent translocations, specific trisomies, and expression of cyclin D genes, MM tumors can be divided into 8 TC (translocation/cyclin D) groups (11q13, 6p21, 4p16, maf, D1, D1+D2, D2, and none) that appear to be defined by early, and perhaps initiating, oncogenic events. However, despite subsequent progression events, these groups have differing gene expression profiles and also significant differences in the prevalence of bone disease, frequency at relapse, and progression to extramedullary tumor.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Frequent gain of chromosome band 1q21 in plasma-cell dyscrasias detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization: incidence increases from MGUS to relapsed myeloma and is related to prognosis and disease progression following tandem stem-cell transplantation.

              Using fluorescence in situ hybridization we investigated amplification of chromosome band 1q21 (Amp1q21) in more than 500 untreated patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS; n = 14), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM; n = 31), and newly diagnosed MM (n = 479) as well as 45 with relapsed MM. The frequency of Amp1q21 was 0% in MGUS, 45% in SMM, 43% in newly diagnosed MM, and 72% in relapsed MM (newly diagnosed versus relapsed MM, P < .001). Amp1q21 was detected in 10 of 12 patients whose disease evolved to active MM compared with 4 of 19 who remained with SMM (P < .001). Patients with newly diagnosed MM with Amp1q21 had inferior 5-year event-free/overall survival compared with those lacking Amp1q21 (38%/52% versus 62%/78%, both P < .001). Thalidomide improved 5-year EFS in patients lacking Amp1q21 but not in those with Amp1q21 (P = .004). Multivariate analysis including other major predictors revealed that Amp1q21 was an independent poor prognostic factor. Relapsed patients who had Amp1q21 at relapse had inferior 5-year postrelapse survival compared with those lacking Amp1q21 at relapse (15% versus 53%, P = .027). The proportion of cells with Amp1q21 and the copy number of 1q21 tended to increase at relapse compared with diagnosis. Our data suggest that Amp1q21 is associated with both disease progression and poor prognosis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +1 501-526-6990 , GJMorgan@uams.edu
                Journal
                Leukemia
                Leukemia
                Leukemia
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                0887-6924
                1476-5551
                2 July 2018
                2 July 2018
                2019
                : 33
                : 1
                : 159-170
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 4687 1637, GRID grid.241054.6, Myeloma Institute, , University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, ; Little Rock, AR USA
                [2 ]Celgene Corporation, San Francisco, CA USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.427727.3, Cancer Research and Biostatistics, ; Seattle, WA USA
                [4 ]ISNI 000000041936754X, GRID grid.38142.3c, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, , Harvard Medical School, ; Boston, MA USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0461 1802, GRID grid.418722.a, Celgene Corporation, ; Summit, NJ USA
                [6 ]Celgene Institute of Translational Research Europe, Sevilla, Spain
                [7 ]GRID grid.430368.a, Rancho BioSciences, ; San Diego, CA USA
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9350 5788, GRID grid.429426.f, Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, ; Norwalk, CT USA
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0507 3225, GRID grid.250942.8, Translational Genomics Research Institute, ; Phoenix, AZ USA
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1757 2822, GRID grid.4708.b, University of Milan, ; Milano, Italy
                [11 ]GRID grid.4817.a, University of Nantes, ; Nantes, France
                [12 ]Cedars-Sinai Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA USA
                [13 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8875 6339, GRID grid.417468.8, Department of Hematology, , Mayo Clinic, ; Scottsdale, AZ USA
                [14 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0328 4908, GRID grid.5253.1, Department of Medicine V, Hematology and Oncology, , University Hospital of Heidelberg, ; Heidelberg, Germany
                [15 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0492 0584, GRID grid.7497.d, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, ; Heidelberg, Germany
                [16 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1958 8658, GRID grid.8379.5, Department of Internal Medicine II, , Wurzburg University, ; Wurzburg, Germany
                [17 ]ISNI 000000040459992X, GRID grid.5645.2, Department of Hematology, , Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, ; Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [18 ]Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
                [19 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0941 6502, GRID grid.189967.8, Winship Cancer Institute, , Emory University, ; Atlanta, GA USA
                [20 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0462 7212, GRID grid.1006.7, Department of Haematology, , Newcastle University, ; Newcastle, UK
                [21 ]GRID grid.457379.b, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, ; U1037 Toulouse, France
                [22 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1457 2980, GRID grid.411175.7, L’Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, , Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, ; Toulouse, France
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8615-6254
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2498-7295
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4375-7399
                Article
                196
                10.1038/s41375-018-0196-8
                6326953
                29967379
                762dbdba-26c5-4243-97cd-4147de0076c9
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 1 June 2018
                : 7 June 2018
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2019

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article