10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reconsidering self‐deprecation as a communication practice

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          ‘Self‐deprecation’ ( SD) is widely understood within social psychology and popular culture as a form of self‐talk that reflects a cognitive state, such as low self‐esteem or negative self‐regard. However, most research on SD suffers theoretical and methodological problems that fail to account for how its cognitive and linguistic aspects can be reconciled. We know little about SD as it occurs in interactional settings. Utilizing a conversation analytic ( CA) perspective that brackets cognitive explanations for linguistic phenomena, this paper draws on more than 100 hours of transcribed recordings of interactions from diverse settings to systematically examine the form and function of a common class of SD: critical comments by a speaker on their current talk or actions (self‐deprecatory meta‐comments; SDMCs). Analyses demonstrate that SDMCs are used in environments of possible or actual interactional trouble, and manage this trouble in different sequential positions. The paper shows that SDs can be treated as a communication practice. Rigorous analysis of SDMCs can enrich understanding of the construction of ‘identities’ in talk. It advances a CA understanding of the ascription of social actions, and the preference for self‐criticism over criticism by others. Findings suggest that widespread advice to self‐deprecate less may be invalid.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Global Self-Esteem and Specific Self-Esteem: Different Concepts, Different Outcomes

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Disclaimers

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              From chump to champ: people's appraisals of their earlier and present selves.

              The authors present and test a theory of temporal self-appraisal. According to the theory, people can maintain their typically favorable self-regard by disparaging their distant and complimenting their recent past selves. This pattern of appraisals should be stronger for more important attributes because of their greater impact on self-regard and stronger for self-ratings than for ratings of other people. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated that participants are more critical of distant past selves than of current selves, and Study 3 showed that this effect is obtained even when concurrent evaluations indicate no actual improvement. Studies 4 and 5 revealed that people perceived greater improvement for self than for acquaintances and siblings over the same time period. Study 6 provided support for the predicted effects of temporal distance and attribute importance on people's evaluation of past selves.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                susan.speer@manchester.ac.uk
                Journal
                Br J Soc Psychol
                Br J Soc Psychol
                10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8309
                BJSO
                The British Journal of Social Psychology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0144-6665
                2044-8309
                18 May 2019
                October 2019
                : 58
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/bjso.v58.4 )
                : 806-828
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Psychology and Mental Health School of Health Sciences The University of Manchester UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence should be addressed to Susan A. Speer, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Coupland 1 Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK (email: susan.speer@ 123456manchester.ac.uk ).
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3048-2851
                Article
                BJSO12329
                10.1111/bjso.12329
                6851542
                31102414
                757225e0-1319-44d3-b063-45cbd60e9ffd
                © 2019 The Author. British Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 December 2018
                : 03 April 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Pages: 23, Words: 10919
                Funding
                Funded by: Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Identities and Social Action Programme
                Award ID: RES‐148‐25‐0029
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                October 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.1 mode:remove_FC converted:13.11.2019

                conversation analysis,identity,meta‐talk,preference organization,self‐criticism,self‐esteem

                Comments

                Comment on this article