4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A snapshot on current approaches to lymphadenectomy in liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: results from an international survey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The use of lymphadenectomy (LND) during resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is still debated, leading to differing practices in different centers and countries. The aim of this study was to assess such differences. A survey on LND for ICC was distributed to the members of the International Hepato-PancreatoBiliary Association (IHPBA) and the Italian Chapter of IHPBA (AICEP). Two-hundred thirty-four surgeons completed the survey (88% males; median age 46 years). Preoperative nodal staging was deemed mandatory/very important by 65%. Adequate LND was defined as hepatoduodenal ligament LND by 33%, LND at specific nodal stations by 28% and retrieval of > 5 nodes by 28%. The decision to perform LND was influenced by comorbidities (48%), chronic liver disease (38%) and satellitosis (32%). Most participants modify perioperative management in case of clinically positive nodes, 50% stating they would give neoadjuvant therapy. The role of LND in clinically node negative disease was adequate staging for 88%, survival benefit for 50.5% and clinical trials eligibility for 18.5%. Our survey confirms heterogeneity in the evaluation of role and extent of LND for ICC, how this relates to subjective perception of importance of LND, and need of a systematic approach in this area.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13304-024-01852-0.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)

            Analogous to checklists of recommendations such as the CONSORT statement (for randomized trials), or the QUORUM statement (for systematic reviews), which are designed to ensure the quality of reports in the medical literature, a checklist of recommendations for authors is being presented by the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) in an effort to ensure complete descriptions of Web-based surveys. Papers on Web-based surveys reported according to the CHERRIES statement will give readers a better understanding of the sample (self-)selection and its possible differences from a “representative” sample. It is hoped that author adherence to the checklist will increase the usefulness of such reports.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study

              Despite improvements in multidisciplinary management, patients with biliary tract cancer have a poor outcome. Only 20% of patients are eligible for surgical resection with curative intent, with 5-year overall survival of less than 10% for all patients. To our knowledge, no studies have described a benefit of adjuvant therapy. We aimed to determine whether adjuvant capecitabine improved overall survival compared with observation following surgery for biliary tract cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                carlo.sposito@istitutotumori.mi.it
                Journal
                Updates Surg
                Updates Surg
                Updates in Surgery
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2038-131X
                2038-3312
                7 May 2024
                7 May 2024
                2024
                : 76
                : 5
                : 1797-1805
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.417893.0, ISNI 0000 0001 0807 2568, HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, , Fondazione, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, ; Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
                [2 ]Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, ( https://ror.org/00wjc7c48) Milan, Italy
                [3 ]Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, ( https://ror.org/01111rn36) Bologna, Italy
                [4 ]GRID grid.415079.e, ISNI 0000 0004 1759 989X, Morgagni, Pierantoni Hospital, ; Forlì, Italy
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2276-2669
                Article
                1852
                10.1007/s13304-024-01852-0
                11455682
                38713394
                754a9a64-ce5d-46f2-b247-0585eb8e878f
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 2 January 2024
                : 10 April 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: Università degli Studi di Milano
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Italian Society of Surgery (SIC) 2024

                Surgery
                intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma,lymphadenectomy,liver resection,survey
                Surgery
                intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, lymphadenectomy, liver resection, survey

                Comments

                Comment on this article