Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Access of people with pulmonary tuberculosis to government programs: Primary Care professionals’ perceptions Translated title: Acceso de personas con tuberculosis pulmonar a programas gubernamentales: percepciones de profesionales de Atención Primaria Translated title: Acesso de pessoas com tuberculose pulmonar aos programas governamentais: percepções dos profissionais da Atenção Primária

      research-article
      I , I , II , III , II , IV , IV , IV , IV , I , I , I , V
      Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
      Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
      Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, Social Programs, Social Vulnerability, Health Personnel, Primary Health Care, Tuberculosis Pulmonar, Programas Sociales, Vulnerabilidad Social, Personal de Salud, Atención Primaria de Salud, Tuberculose Pulmonar, Programas Sociais, Vulnerabilidade Social, Pessoal de Saúde, Atenção Primária à Saúde

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Objective:

          to analyze Primary Health Care professionals’ perceptions about the access of people with pulmonary tuberculosis to government social support and income transfer programs.

          Methods:

          multicenter/qualitative study, carried out in Family Health Units in four Brazilian capitals: Belém/Pará, Campo Grande/Mato Grosso do Sul, Recife/Pernambuco and Rio de Janeiro/Rio de Janeiro. Fifty-eight professionals participated (social workers, dentists, nurses, pharmacists, physicians and nursing technicians), who provided assistance to people with pulmonary tuberculosis. Individual interviews were conducted, and the content analysis technique was used.

          Results:

          among the participants, 45/77.6% were women and 33/56.9% were between 25 and 40 years old. Two thematic categories were organized, demonstrating the perceptions about the possibilities of access to government programs by people with pulmonary tuberculosis in vulnerable situations and the obstacles inherent to this context.

          Final considerations:

          it is necessary to move forward in improving patient access to social programs.

          RESUMO

          Objetivo:

          analisar as percepções dos profissionais da Atenção Primária à Saúde sobre o acesso de pessoas com tuberculose pulmonar aos programas sociais governamentais de suporte e de transferência de renda.

          Métodos:

          estudo multicêntrico/qualitativo, realizado em Unidades de Saúde da Família de quatro capitais brasileiras: Belém/Pará, Campo Grande/Mato Grosso do Sul, Recife/Pernambuco e Rio de Janeiro/Rio de Janeiro. Participaram 58 profissionais (assistentes sociais, dentistas, enfermeiros, farmacêuticos, médicos e técnicos de enfermagem), que prestavam assistência às pessoas com tuberculose pulmonar. Foram realizadas entrevistas individuais, e utilizou-se a técnica de análise de conteúdo.

          Resultados:

          entre os participantes, 45/77,6% eram mulheres e 33/56,9% tinham entre 25 e 40 anos. Organizaram-se duas categorias temáticas, demonstrando as percepções acerca das possibilidades de acesso aos programas governamentais por pessoas com tuberculose pulmonar em situação de vulnerabilidade e os obstáculos inerentes a esse contexto.

          Considerações finais:

          é necessário avançar na melhoria do acesso dos doentes aos programas sociais.

          RESUMEN

          Objetivo:

          analizar las percepciones de los profesionales de la Atención Primaria de Salud sobre el acceso de las personas con tuberculosis pulmonar a los programas gubernamentales de apoyo social y transferencia de ingresos.

          Métodos:

          estudio multicéntrico/cualitativo, realizado en Unidades de Salud de la Familia en cuatro capitales brasileñas: Belém/Pará, Campo Grande/Mato Grosso do Sul, Recife/Pernambuco y Rio de Janeiro/Rio de Janeiro. Participaron 58 profesionales (trabajadores sociales, odontólogos, enfermeros, farmacéuticos, médicos y técnicos de enfermería) que brindaron asistencia a personas con tuberculosis pulmonar. Se realizaron entrevistas individuales y se utilizó la técnica de análisis de contenido.

          Resultados:

          entre los participantes, 45/77,6% eran mujeres y 33/56,9% tenían entre 25 y 40 años. Se organizaron dos categorías temáticas, demostrando las percepciones sobre las posibilidades de acceso a los programas gubernamentales por parte de las personas con tuberculosis pulmonar en situación de vulnerabilidad y los obstáculos inherentes a este contexto.

          Consideraciones finales:

          es necesario avanzar en mejorar el acceso de los pacientes a los programas sociales.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

          Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Análise de conteúdo

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Effect of the Bolsa Familia Programme on the outcome of tuberculosis treatment: a prospective cohort study

              Social protection interventions might improve tuberculosis outcomes and could help to control the epidemic in Brazil. The aim of this study was to evaluate the independent effect of the Bolsa Familia Programme (BFP) on tuberculosis treatment outcomes in Brazil.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: analysis and/or interpretationRole: final review with critical and intellectual participation in the manuscript
                Role: analysis and/or interpretationRole: final review with critical and intellectual participation in the manuscript
                Role: analysis and/or interpretationRole: final review with critical and intellectual participation in the manuscript
                Role: analysis and/or interpretationRole: final review with critical and intellectual participation in the manuscript
                Role: analysis and/or interpretationRole: final review with critical and intellectual participation in the manuscript
                Role: analysis and/or interpretationRole: final review with critical and intellectual participation in the manuscript
                Role: analysis and/or interpretationRole: final review with critical and intellectual participation in the manuscript
                Role: analysis and/or interpretationRole: final review with critical and intellectual participation in the manuscript
                Role: analysis and/or interpretationRole: final review with critical and intellectual participation in the manuscript
                Role: study/research conception or designRole: analysis and/or interpretationRole: final review with critical and intellectual participation in the manuscript
                Role: study/research conception or designRole: analysis and/or interpretationRole: final review with critical and intellectual participation in the manuscript
                Role: analysis and/or interpretationRole: final review with critical and intellectual participation in the manuscript
                Role: study/research conception or designRole: analysis and/or interpretationRole: final review with critical and intellectual participation in the manuscript
                Journal
                Rev Bras Enferm
                Rev Bras Enferm
                reben
                Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
                Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
                0034-7167
                1984-0446
                13 November 2023
                2023
                : 76
                : Suppl 2
                : e20220716
                Affiliations
                [I ]Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [II ]Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul. Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
                [III ]Universidade de Pernambuco. Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
                [IV ]Universidade do Estado do Pará. Belém, Pará, Brazil
                [V ]Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Erlon Gabriel Rego de Andrade E-mail: erlon.grdandrade@ 123456aluno.uepa.br

                EDITOR IN CHIEF: Dulce Barbosa

                ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Mellina Yamamura

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6833-4013
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9346-3458
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4079-5883
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2256-8874
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6953-4965
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0065-4509
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9968-9546
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7109-6121
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0761-5836
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3278-5645
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2230-3048
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0276-8166
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4826-3355
                Article
                00158
                10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0716
                10642008
                7521872c-2e8a-487a-9b84-f0daf7a52bbf

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 07 December 2022
                : 19 April 2023
                Categories
                Original Article

                tuberculosis, pulmonary,social programs,social vulnerability,health personnel,primary health care,tuberculosis pulmonar,programas sociales,vulnerabilidad social,personal de salud,atención primaria de salud,tuberculose pulmonar,programas sociais,vulnerabilidade social,pessoal de saúde,atenção primária à saúde

                Comments

                Comment on this article