For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
8
views
30
references
 Top references
cited by
4
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      407
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lack of CD44 overexpression and application of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin independently indicate excellent prognosis in patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND: HPV-16 positivity in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx (OPSCC) is associated with better prognosis. However, in more than 40% of HPV infected patients progression of cancer disease is observed, which indicates the presence of cancer cells resistant to therapy. Some studies suggest that there may be a subpopulation of cancer stem cells (CSCs), which simultaneously exhibit unlimited ability to self-renew and differentiate towards neoplastic cells. The relation between HPV16 infection and biomarkers of CSCs is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the expression of CD44, CD98, ALDH1/2 and P16 in oropharyngeal cancer patients with or without HPV16 infection, as well as to analyze the prognostic potential of selected CSCs biomarkers in these two subgroups. METHODS: The study was performed in a group of 63 patients. HPV16 infection status was analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, while CD44, CD98, ALDH1/2 and P16 expression by immunohistochemistry. In survival analysis, two endpoints were applied: overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Among 63 cancers, HPV16 infection was found in 25 tumors (39.7%), overexpression of CD44, CD98, ALDH1/2 and P16 in 43 (68.2%), 30 (47.6%), 33 (52.4%) and 27 (42.9%) cancers, respectively. In the HPV16-positive subgroup, DFS rate of 100% was observed in patients with tumors characterized by lack of CD44 overexpression and those treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin (CisPt-CRT). In the HPV16-negative subgroup 100% of DFS was noticed for patients (n = 6) with P16 immunopositive tumors. In this subgroup none of the CSCs biomarkers evaluated in the study had any impact on OS or DFS. In patients with HPV16-positive oropharyngeal cancer, lack of CD44 overexpression and application of CisPt-CRT were found to be positive prognostic factors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (NRG Oncology RTOG 1016): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial

          Maura L. Gillison, Andy M Trotti, Jonathan Harris … (2018)
          Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma have high survival when treated with radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Whether replacement of cisplatin with cetuximab-an antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor-can preserve high survival and reduce treatment toxicity is unknown. We investigated whether cetuximab would maintain a high proportion of patient survival and reduce acute and late toxicity.
          Article 0 comments Cited 391 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Radiotherapy plus cisplatin or cetuximab in low-risk human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (De-ESCALaTE HPV): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial

            Hisham Mehanna, Max Robinson, Andrew Hartley … (2019)
            Summary Background The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer, a disease affecting younger patients, is rapidly increasing. Cetuximab, an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, has been proposed for treatment de-escalation in this setting to reduce the toxicity of standard cisplatin treatment, but no randomised evidence exists for the efficacy of this strategy. Methods We did an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial at 32 head and neck treatment centres in Ireland, the Netherlands, and the UK, in patients aged 18 years or older with HPV-positive low-risk oropharyngeal cancer (non-smokers or lifetime smokers with a smoking history of <10 pack-years). Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive, in addition to radiotherapy (70 Gy in 35 fractions), either intravenous cisplatin (100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43 of radiotherapy) or intravenous cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading dose followed by seven weekly infusions of 250 mg/m2). The primary outcome was overall severe (grade 3–5) toxicity events at 24 months from the end of treatment. The primary outcome was assessed by intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN33522080. Findings Between Nov 12, 2012, and Oct 1, 2016, 334 patients were recruited (166 in the cisplatin group and 168 in the cetuximab group). Overall (acute and late) severe (grade 3–5) toxicity did not differ significantly between treatment groups at 24 months (mean number of events per patient 4·8 [95% CI 4·2–5·4] with cisplatin vs 4·8 [4·2–5·4] with cetuximab; p=0·98). At 24 months, overall all-grade toxicity did not differ significantly either (mean number of events per patient 29·2 [95% CI 27·3–31·0] with cisplatin vs 30·1 [28·3–31·9] with cetuximab; p=0·49). However, there was a significant difference between cisplatin and cetuximab in 2-year overall survival (97·5% vs 89·4%, hazard ratio 5·0 [95% CI 1·7–14·7]; p=0·001) and 2-year recurrence (6·0% vs 16·1%, 3·4 [1·6–7·2]; p=0·0007). Interpretation Compared with the standard cisplatin regimen, cetuximab showed no benefit in terms of reduced toxicity, but instead showed significant detriment in terms of tumour control. Cisplatin and radiotherapy should be used as the standard of care for HPV-positive low-risk patients who are able to tolerate cisplatin. Funding Cancer Research UK.
            Article 0 comments Cited 238 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies.

              K S McCarty, L S Miller, E B Cox … (1985)
              Attempts at histochemical localization of estrogen receptor with anti-steroid antibody or some fluoresceinated estrogens have given unacceptable sensitivities and specificities when compared with biochemical methods or clinical response. In the present study a monoclonal antibody against estrogen receptor (H222 Sp gamma) was used on cryostat sections of freshly frozen breast tumors with a peroxidase-antiperoxidase immunoperoxidase technique. Biochemical receptor analyses were by dextran-coated charcoal analyses. Tumors from three separate cohorts of patients were studied as follows: population A, 62 primary breast cancers from 1983; population B, 72 primary lesions stored from 1976 to 1983; and population C, 23 patients with metastases, treated with hormonal therapy. Distinct staining was seen in the cell nucleus. A semiquantitative relationship was seen between histochemical score assessment of staining and biochemical assay in each cohort. The sensitivity and specificity using a threshold of 75 for the histochemical score and more than 20 femtomoles/mg of protein for dextran-coated charcoal analyses were as follows: population A, specificity, 89%, and sensitivity, 95%; population B, specificity, 94%, and sensitivity 88%; and for population C, the comparison was with objective clinical response yielding specificity, 89%, and sensitivity, 93%.
              Article 0 comments Cited 180 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Title: Tumor Biology
                Abbreviated Title: TUB
                Publisher: IOS Press
                ISSN (Print): 10104283
                ISSN (Electronic): 14230380
                Publication date Created: May 19 2021
                Publication date (Print): May 19 2021
                Volume: 43
                Issue: 1
                Pages: 99-113
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland
                [2 ]Department of Tumour Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, Poland
                [3 ]Department of General, Oncological and Vascular Surgery, 5th Military Clinical Hospital in Cracow, Poland
                [4 ]Department of Radiotherapy Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, Poland
                Article
                DOI: 10.3233/TUB-200049
                PubMed ID: 34024796
                SO-VID: 74f323d1-70d2-420a-b247-6819dcb4a62d
                Copyright © © 2021
                License:

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History

                Data availability:

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content407

                See all similar

                Cited by4

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors394

                See all reference authors