5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      External Correlates of Adult Digital Problem-Solving Process : An Empirical Analysis of PIAAC PSTRE Action Sequences

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 4
      Zeitschrift für Psychologie
      Hogrefe Publishing Group

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract: Computerized assessments and interactive simulation tasks are increasingly popular and afford the collection of process data, i.e., an examinee’s sequence of actions (e.g., clickstreams, keystrokes) that arises from interactions with each task. Action sequence data contain rich information on the problem-solving process but are in a nonstandard, variable-length discrete sequence format. Two methods that directly extract features from the raw action sequences, namely multidimensional scaling and sequence-to-sequence autoencoders, produce multidimensional numerical features that summarize original sequence information. This study explores the utility of action sequence features in understanding how problem-solving behavior relates to cognitive proficiencies and demographic characteristics. This is empirically illustrated with the process data from the 2012 PIAAC PSTRE digital assessment. Regularized regression results showed that action sequence features are more predictive of examinees’ demographic and cognitive characteristics compared to final outcomes. Partial least squares analysis further aided the identification of behavioral patterns systematically associated with demographic/cognitive characteristics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization.

          Is perception of the whole based on perception of its parts? There is psychological and physiological evidence for parts-based representations in the brain, and certain computational theories of object recognition rely on such representations. But little is known about how brains or computers might learn the parts of objects. Here we demonstrate an algorithm for non-negative matrix factorization that is able to learn parts of faces and semantic features of text. This is in contrast to other methods, such as principal components analysis and vector quantization, that learn holistic, not parts-based, representations. Non-negative matrix factorization is distinguished from the other methods by its use of non-negativity constraints. These constraints lead to a parts-based representation because they allow only additive, not subtractive, combinations. When non-negative matrix factorization is implemented as a neural network, parts-based representations emerge by virtue of two properties: the firing rates of neurons are never negative and synaptic strengths do not change sign.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Indexing by latent semantic analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Zeitschrift für Psychologie
                Zeitschrift für Psychologie
                Hogrefe Publishing Group
                2190-8370
                2151-2604
                April 2024
                April 2024
                : 232
                : 2
                : 120-136
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology and Statistics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
                [2 ]Department of Mathematics, University of Arizona, AZ, USA
                [3 ]Interdisciplinary Program of Data Science and Analytics, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA
                [4 ]Department of Statistics, Columbia University, NY, USA
                Article
                10.1027/2151-2604/a000554
                74ae6822-a00d-4200-93e4-ef9b5b09d319
                © 2024
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article