21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Early disengagement from HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis services and associated factors among female sex workers in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: a socioecological approach

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention tool when taken as prescribed. However, suboptimal use may challenge its real-life impact. To support female sex workers in their efforts to prevent themselves from HIV, it is essential to identify factors that contribute to early disengagement from PrEP care. In this study, we aimed to estimate the risk of early disengagement from PrEP services among female sex workers in Tanzania and associated factors using a socioecological model as a guiding framework.

          Methods

          The study was conducted as part of a pragmatic mHealth trial for PrEP roll-out in Dar es Salaam in 2021. We estimated the risk of early disengagement, defined as not presenting for the first follow-up visit (within 56 days of enrolment), and its associations with individual, social, behavioural and structural factors (age, self-perceived HIV risk, mental distress, harmful alcohol use, condom use, number of sex work clients, female sex worker stigma and mobility) using multivariable logistic regression models, with marginal standardisation to obtain adjusted relative risks (aRR).

          Results

          Of the 470 female sex workers enrolled in the study, 340 (74.6%) did not attend the first follow-up visit (disengaged). Mental distress (aRR=1.14; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.27) was associated with increased risk of disengagement. Participants who reported a higher number of clients per month (10–29 partners: aRR=0.87; 95% CI 0.76 to 0.98 and ≥30 partners: aRR=0.80; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.91) and older participants (≥35 years) (RR=0.75; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.95) had a lower risk of disengagement.

          Conclusions and recommendations

          Early disengagement with the PrEP programme was high. Mental distress, younger age and having fewer clients were risk factors for disengagement. We argue that PrEP programmes could benefit from including mental health screening and treatment, as well as directing attention to younger sex workers and those reporting fewer clients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener.

          A number of self-administered questionnaires are available for assessing depression severity, including the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire depression module (PHQ-9). Because even briefer measures might be desirable for use in busy clinical settings or as part of comprehensive health questionnaires, we evaluated a 2-item version of the PHQ depression module, the PHQ-2. The PHQ-2 inquires about the frequency of depressed mood and anhedonia over the past 2 weeks, scoring each as 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). The PHQ-2 was completed by 6000 patients in 8 primary care clinics and 7 obstetrics-gynecology clinics. Construct validity was assessed using the 20-item Short-Form General Health Survey, self-reported sick days and clinic visits, and symptom-related difficulty. Criterion validity was assessed against an independent structured mental health professional (MHP) interview in a sample of 580 patients. As PHQ-2 depression severity increased from 0 to 6, there was a substantial decrease in functional status on all 6 SF-20 subscales. Also, symptom-related difficulty, sick days, and healthcare utilization increased. Using the MHP reinterview as the criterion standard, a PHQ-2 score > or =3 had a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 92% for major depression. Likelihood ratio and receiver operator characteristic analysis identified a PHQ-2 score of 3 as the optimal cutpoint for screening purposes. Results were similar in the primary care and obstetrics-gynecology samples. The construct and criterion validity of the PHQ-2 make it an attractive measure for depression screening.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection.

            Anxiety, although as common as depression, has received less attention and is often undetected and undertreated. To determine the current prevalence, impairment, and comorbidity of anxiety disorders in primary care and to evaluate a brief measure for detecting these disorders. Criterion-standard study performed between November 2004 and June 2005. 15 U.S. primary care clinics. 965 randomly sampled patients from consecutive clinic patients who completed a self-report questionnaire and agreed to a follow-up telephone interview. 7-item anxiety measure (Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD]-7 scale) in the clinic, followed by a telephone-administered, structured psychiatric interview by a mental health professional who was blinded to the GAD-7 results. Functional status (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-20), depressive and somatic symptoms, and self-reported disability days and physician visits were also assessed. Of the 965 patients, 19.5% (95% CI, 17.0% to 22.1%) had at least 1 anxiety disorder, 8.6% (CI, 6.9% to 10.6%) had posttraumatic stress disorder, 7.6% (CI, 5.9% to 9.4%) had a generalized anxiety disorder, 6.8% (CI, 5.3% to 8.6%) had a panic disorder, and 6.2% (CI, 4.7% to 7.9%) had a social anxiety disorder. Each disorder was associated with substantial impairment that increased significantly (P < 0.001) as the number of anxiety disorders increased. Many patients (41%) with an anxiety disorder reported no current treatment. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that both the GAD-7 scale and its 2 core items (GAD-2) performed well (area under the curve, 0.80 to 0.91) as screening tools for all 4 anxiety disorders. The study included a nonrandom sample of selected primary care practices. Anxiety disorders are prevalent, disabling, and often untreated in primary care. A 2-item screening test may enhance detection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework: a global, crosscutting framework to inform research, intervention development, and policy on health-related stigmas

              Stigma is a well-documented barrier to health seeking behavior, engagement in care and adherence to treatment across a range of health conditions globally. In order to halt the stigmatization process and mitigate the harmful consequences of health-related stigma (i.e. stigma associated with health conditions), it is critical to have an explicit theoretical framework to guide intervention development, measurement, research, and policy. Existing stigma frameworks typically focus on one health condition in isolation and often concentrate on the psychological pathways occurring among individuals. This tendency has encouraged a siloed approach to research on health-related stigmas, focusing on individuals, impeding both comparisons across stigmatized conditions and research on innovations to reduce health-related stigma and improve health outcomes. We propose the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework, which is a global, crosscutting framework based on theory, research, and practice, and demonstrate its application to a range of health conditions, including leprosy, epilepsy, mental health, cancer, HIV, and obesity/overweight. We also discuss how stigma related to race, gender, sexual orientation, class, and occupation intersects with health-related stigmas, and examine how the framework can be used to enhance research, programming, and policy efforts. Research and interventions inspired by a common framework will enable the field to identify similarities and differences in stigma processes across diseases and will amplify our collective ability to respond effectively and at-scale to a major driver of poor health outcomes globally.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Glob Health
                BMJ Glob Health
                bmjgh
                bmjgh
                BMJ Global Health
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2059-7908
                2023
                28 December 2023
                : 8
                : 12
                : e013662
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health , Ringgold_60504University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine , Oslo, Norway
                [2 ]Ringgold_92976Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences , Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
                [3 ]Ringgold_549148University of Dar es Salaam, Mbeya College of Health and Allied Sciences , Mbeya, Tanzania
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Hanne Ochieng Lichtwarck; h.o.lichtwarck@ 123456medisin.uio.no
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4495-7480
                Article
                bmjgh-2023-013662
                10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013662
                10759139
                38154811
                74834f1a-aea3-42d2-8210-dfb9f16b1d9d
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 08 August 2023
                : 25 November 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Research Council of Norway;
                Funded by: Global Health and Vaccination Programme (GLOBVAC);
                Award ID: 285361
                Categories
                Original Research
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                hiv,prevention strategies,epidemiology,public health,environmental health

                Comments

                Comment on this article