1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Randomised controlled trial of preconception lifestyle intervention on maternal and offspring health in people with increased risk of gestational diabetes: study protocol for the BEFORE THE BEGINNING trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with increased risk for type 2 diabetes in the mother and cardiometabolic diseases in the child. The preconception period is an optimal window to adapt the lifestyle for improved outcomes for both mother and child. Our aim is to determine the effect of a lifestyle intervention, initiated before and continued throughout pregnancy, on maternal glucose tolerance and other maternal and infant cardiometabolic outcomes.

          Methods and analysis

          This ongoing randomised controlled trial has included 167 females aged 18–39 years old at increased risk for GDM who are contemplating pregnancy. The participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to an intervention or control group. The intervention consists of exercise (volume is set by a heart rate-based app and corresponds to ≥ 1 hour of weekly exercise at ≥ 80% of individual heart rate maximum), and time-restricted eating (≤ 10 hours/day window of energy intake). The primary outcome measure is glucose tolerance in gestational week 28. Maternal and offspring outcomes are measured before and during pregnancy, at delivery, and at 6–8 weeks post partum. Primary and secondary continuous outcome measures will be compared between groups based on the ‘intention to treat’ principle using linear mixed models.

          Ethics and dissemination

          The Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Norway has approved the study (REK 143756). The anonymised results will be submitted for publication and posted in a publicly accessible database of clinical study results.

          Trial registration number

          Clinical trial gov NCT04585581.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research

          Despite the prevalence of sleep complaints among psychiatric patients, few questionnaires have been specifically designed to measure sleep quality in clinical populations. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these seven components yields one global score. Clinical and clinimetric properties of the PSQI were assessed over an 18-month period with "good" sleepers (healthy subjects, n = 52) and "poor" sleepers (depressed patients, n = 54; sleep-disorder patients, n = 62). Acceptable measures of internal homogeneity, consistency (test-retest reliability), and validity were obtained. A global PSQI score greater than 5 yielded a diagnostic sensitivity of 89.6% and specificity of 86.5% (kappa = 0.75, p less than 0.001) in distinguishing good and poor sleepers. The clinimetric and clinical properties of the PSQI suggest its utility both in psychiatric clinical practice and research activities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity.

            Physical inactivity is a global concern, but diverse physical activity measures in use prevent international comparisons. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed as an instrument for cross-national monitoring of physical activity and inactivity. Between 1997 and 1998, an International Consensus Group developed four long and four short forms of the IPAQ instruments (administered by telephone interview or self-administration, with two alternate reference periods, either the "last 7 d" or a "usual week" of recalled physical activity). During 2000, 14 centers from 12 countries collected reliability and/or validity data on at least two of the eight IPAQ instruments. Test-retest repeatability was assessed within the same week. Concurrent (inter-method) validity was assessed at the same administration, and criterion IPAQ validity was assessed against the CSA (now MTI) accelerometer. Spearman's correlation coefficients are reported, based on the total reported physical activity. Overall, the IPAQ questionnaires produced repeatable data (Spearman's rho clustered around 0.8), with comparable data from short and long forms. Criterion validity had a median rho of about 0.30, which was comparable to most other self-report validation studies. The "usual week" and "last 7 d" reference periods performed similarly, and the reliability of telephone administration was similar to the self-administered mode. The IPAQ instruments have acceptable measurement properties, at least as good as other established self-reports. Considering the diverse samples in this study, IPAQ has reasonable measurement properties for monitoring population levels of physical activity among 18- to 65-yr-old adults in diverse settings. The short IPAQ form "last 7 d recall" is recommended for national monitoring and the long form for research requiring more detailed assessment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials

              High quality protocols facilitate proper conduct, reporting, and external review of clinical trials. However, the completeness of trial protocols is often inadequate. To help improve the content and quality of protocols, an international group of stakeholders developed the SPIRIT 2013 Statement (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials). The SPIRIT Statement provides guidance in the form of a checklist of recommended items to include in a clinical trial protocol. This SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration paper provides important information to promote full understanding of the checklist recommendations. For each checklist item, we provide a rationale and detailed description; a model example from an actual protocol; and relevant references supporting its importance. We strongly recommend that this explanatory paper be used in conjunction with the SPIRIT Statement. A website of resources is also available (www.spirit-statement.org). The SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration paper, together with the Statement, should help with the drafting of trial protocols. Complete documentation of key trial elements can facilitate transparency and protocol review for the benefit of all stakeholders.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2023
                4 October 2023
                : 13
                : 10
                : e073572
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging , Ringgold_8018Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim, Norway
                [2 ]departmentDepartment of Women's Health , Ringgold_60510St Olavs Hospital Trondheim University Hospital , Trondheim, Norway
                [3 ]departmentDepartment of Endocrinology , Ringgold_60510St Olavs Hospital Trondheim University Hospital , Trondheim, Norway
                [4 ]departmentDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine , Ringgold_8018Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim, Norway
                [5 ]departmentChildren's Clinic , Ringgold_60510St Olavs Hospital Trondheim University Hospital , Trondheim, Norway
                [6 ]departmentCentre of Molecular Inflammation Research , Ringgold_8018Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim, Norway
                [7 ]departmentClinical Research Unit Central Norway , Ringgold_60510St Olavs Hospital Trondheim University Hospital , Trondheim, Norway
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Trine Moholdt; trine.moholdt@ 123456ntnu.no
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5505-3623
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1024-8088
                Article
                bmjopen-2023-073572
                10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073572
                10551988
                37793933
                7479a05c-561b-4c73-bdd0-25cc384d6fc6
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 10 March 2023
                : 17 September 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: The Liaison Committee for education, research, and innovation in Central Norway;
                Award ID: N/A
                Funded by: The Joint Research Committee between St. Olav’s Hospital and the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU (FFU);
                Award ID: N/A
                Funded by: Centre for Innovative Ultrasound Solutions (CIUS), NTNU;
                Award ID: N/A
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009708, Novo Nordisk Fonden;
                Award ID: NNF19SA058975
                Categories
                Sports and Exercise Medicine
                1506
                1736
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                clinical trial,maternal medicine,fetal medicine,obesity,diabetes in pregnancy,nutrition & dietetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article