2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of acute kidney injury with the risk of cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Since previous studies have shown a paradoxical relationship between acute kidney injury (AKI) and risk of cognitive impairment, there is an urgent need for a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between AKI and risk of cognitive impairment or dementia.

          Materials and methods

          From database inception to October 2023, we searched PubMed, OVID (Medline), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. This study examined AKI and cognitive impairment or dementia observational studies. Two authors independently assessed cohort and cross-sectional study quality using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and AHRQ Scale. They also used ROBINS-I to assess bias. The meta-analysis used fixed effects. Sensitivity analysis verified results stability. The funnel plot, Egger test, and Begg test determined publication bias in the results.

          Results

          Seven studies with 423,876 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with AKI were at higher risk of cognitive impairment or dementia compared to those who had not experienced AKI (OR = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.77–1.98, I 2=46.0%, p = 0.08). All subgroups showed a substantial connection between AKI and cognitive impairment. Compared to domestic research, the connection was stronger in overseas studies (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.66–2.87). Both cognitive impairment and dementia outcomes showed a substantial connection between AKI and cognitive impairment, with OR values of 2.00 (95% CI: 1.44–2.76) and 2.04 (95% CI: 1.66–2.51).

          Conclusions

          We found that AKI significantly increases cognitive impairment or dementia risk. Thus, early interventions to delay cognitive impairment and prevent adverse outcomes in AKI patients are needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

              Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ren Fail
                Ren Fail
                Renal Failure
                Taylor & Francis
                0886-022X
                1525-6049
                15 November 2023
                2023
                15 November 2023
                : 45
                : 2
                : 2279647
                Affiliations
                [a ]Affiliated Hospital of Jinggangshan University, Center for Clinical Medicine Research of Jinggangshan University , Ji’an, Jiangxi Province, China
                [b ]Department of Medicine, Jinggangshan University , Ji’an, Jiangxi Province, China
                [c ]Online Collaborative Research Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Ministry of Education, Jinggangshan University Branch , Jiangxi Province, China
                [d ] Department of Philosophy, University of Jena, China
                [e ]Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Jinggangshan University, Jinggangshan University , Ji’an, Jiangxi Province, China
                [f ]College of Nursing, Gannan Medical University , Ganzhou, China
                Author notes
                [‡]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2023.2279647.

                CONTACT Huping Gong ghp15170092807@ 123456163.com College of Nursing, Gannan Medical University , Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province, 34100, China;
                Lan Chen cljgsu@ 123456163.com Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Jinggangshan University, Jinggangshan University , Ji’an, Jiangxi Province, 343009, China
                Article
                2279647
                10.1080/0886022X.2023.2279647
                10653765
                37964563
                74617e7d-0f61-4be2-bc28-d6de37fbdc04
                © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 8, Words: 5015
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Article

                Nephrology
                acute kidney injury,cognitive impairment,dementia,risk,meta-analysis
                Nephrology
                acute kidney injury, cognitive impairment, dementia, risk, meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article