61
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Single and Combined Effects of Pesticide Seed Dressings and Herbicides on Earthworms, Soil Microorganisms, and Litter Decomposition

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Seed dressing, i.e., the treatment of crop seeds with insecticides and/or fungicides, aiming to protect seeds from pests and diseases, is widely used in conventional agriculture. During the growing season, those crop fields often receive additional broadband herbicide applications. However, despite this broad utilization, very little is known on potential side effects or interactions between these different pesticide classes on soil organisms. In a greenhouse pot experiment, we studied single and interactive effects of seed dressing of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. var. Capo) with neonicotinoid insecticides and/or strobilurin and triazolinthione fungicides and an additional one-time application of a glyphosate-based herbicide on the activity of earthworms, soil microorganisms, litter decomposition, and crop growth. To further address food-web interactions, earthworms were introduced to half of the experimental units as an additional experimental factor. Seed dressings significantly reduced the surface activity of earthworms with no difference whether insecticides or fungicides were used. Moreover, seed dressing effects on earthworm activity were intensified by herbicides (significant herbicide × seed dressing interaction). Neither seed dressings nor herbicide application affected litter decomposition, soil basal respiration, microbial biomass, or specific respiration. Seed dressing did also not affect wheat growth. We conclude that interactive effects on soil biota and processes of different pesticide classes should receive more attention in ecotoxicological research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Plant-microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture.

          Plant-associated microorganisms fulfill important functions for plant growth and health. Direct plant growth promotion by microbes is based on improved nutrient acquisition and hormonal stimulation. Diverse mechanisms are involved in the suppression of plant pathogens, which is often indirectly connected with plant growth. Whereas members of the bacterial genera Azospirillum and Rhizobium are well-studied examples for plant growth promotion, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Serratia, Stenotrophomonas, and Streptomyces and the fungal genera Ampelomyces, Coniothyrium, and Trichoderma are model organisms to demonstrate influence on plant health. Based on these beneficial plant-microbe interactions, it is possible to develop microbial inoculants for use in agricultural biotechnology. Dependent on their mode of action and effects, these products can be used as biofertilizers, plant strengtheners, phytostimulators, and biopesticides. There is a strong growing market for microbial inoculants worldwide with an annual growth rate of approximately 10%. The use of genomic technologies leads to products with more predictable and consistent effects. The future success of the biological control industry will benefit from interdisciplinary research, e.g., on mass production, formulation, interactions, and signaling with the environment, as well as on innovative business management, product marketing, and education. Altogether, the use of microorganisms and the exploitation of beneficial plant-microbe interactions offer promising and environmentally friendly strategies for conventional and organic agriculture worldwide.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates

              We assessed the state of knowledge regarding the effects of large-scale pollution with neonicotinoid insecticides and fipronil on non-target invertebrate species of terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments. A large section of the assessment is dedicated to the state of knowledge on sublethal effects on honeybees (Apis mellifera) because this important pollinator is the most studied non-target invertebrate species. Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), Lumbricidae (earthworms), Apoidae sensu lato (bumblebees, solitary bees) and the section “other invertebrates” review available studies on the other terrestrial species. The sections on freshwater and marine species are rather short as little is known so far about the impact of neonicotinoid insecticides and fipronil on the diverse invertebrate fauna of these widely exposed habitats. For terrestrial and aquatic invertebrate species, the known effects of neonicotinoid pesticides and fipronil are described ranging from organismal toxicology and behavioural effects to population-level effects. For earthworms, freshwater and marine species, the relation of findings to regulatory risk assessment is described. Neonicotinoid insecticides exhibit very high toxicity to a wide range of invertebrates, particularly insects, and field-realistic exposure is likely to result in both lethal and a broad range of important sublethal impacts. There is a major knowledge gap regarding impacts on the grand majority of invertebrates, many of which perform essential roles enabling healthy ecosystem functioning. The data on the few non-target species on which field tests have been performed are limited by major flaws in the outdated test protocols. Despite large knowledge gaps and uncertainties, enough knowledge exists to conclude that existing levels of pollution with neonicotinoids and fipronil resulting from presently authorized uses frequently exceed the lowest observed adverse effect concentrations and are thus likely to have large-scale and wide ranging negative biological and ecological impacts on a wide range of non-target invertebrates in terrestrial, aquatic, marine and benthic habitats.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                21 February 2017
                2017
                : 8
                : 215
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, Institute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna Vienna, Austria
                [2] 2Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne Cologne, Germany
                [3] 3Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich Jülich, Germany
                [4] 4Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Uppsala, Sweden
                [5] 5Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety GmbH (AGES) Vienna, Austria
                Author notes

                Edited by: Vimala Nair, University of Florida, USA

                Reviewed by: Andrey S. Zaitsev, Justus-Liebig-University, Germany/Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution (RAS), Russia; Astrid Rita Taylor, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden

                *Correspondence: Johann G. Zaller johann.zaller@ 123456boku.ac.at

                This article was submitted to Agroecology and Land Use Systems, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2017.00215
                5318401
                740f988f-eeee-4c69-ba79-56acd59e894f
                Copyright © 2017 Van Hoesel, Tiefenbacher, König, Dorn, Hagenguth, Prah, Widhalm, Wiklicky, Koller, Bonkowski, Lagerlöf, Ratzenböck and Zaller.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 26 September 2016
                : 06 February 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 73, Pages: 12, Words: 7847
                Funding
                Funded by: Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft 10.13039/501100007182
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Original Research

                Plant science & Botany
                agrochemicals,agroecology,neonicotinoids,non-target effects,pesticide,seed coatings,soil organisms,glyphosate-herbicide

                Comments

                Comment on this article