0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • Residual motion during spirometry induced deep-inspiration-breath-hold is small.

          • Surface tracking alone is no sufficient surrogate for internal motion in all patients.

          • Real-time 3D soft-tissue monitoring assures maximum security.

          • Observed patient-specific residual errors may require individualised safety margins.

          Abstract

          Background and purpose

          Spirometry induced deep-inspiration-breath-hold (DIBH) reduces intrafractional motion during upper abdominal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether surface scanning (SGRT) is an adequate surrogate for monitoring residual internal motion during DIBH. Residual motion detected by SGRT was compared with experimental 4D-ultrasound (US) and an internal motion detection benchmark (diaphragm-dome-position in kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) projections).

          Materials and methods

          Intrafractional monitoring was performed with SGRT and US in 460 DIBHs of 12 patients. Residual motion detected by all modalities (SGRT (anterior-posterior (AP)), US (AP, craniocaudal (CC)) and CBCT (CC)) was analyzed. Agreement analysis included Wilcoxon signed rank test, Maloney and Rastogi’s test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

          Results

          Interquartile range was 0.7 mm (US(AP)), 0.8 mm (US(CC)), 0.9 mm (SGRT) and 0.8 mm (CBCT). SGRT(AP) vs. CBCT(CC) and US(CC) vs. CBCT(CC) showed comparable agreement (PCCs 0.53 and 0.52, ICCs 0.51 and 0.49) with slightly higher precision of CBCT(CC). Most agreement was observed for SGRT(AP) vs. US(AP) with largest PCC (0.61) and ICC (0.60), least agreement for SGRT(AP) vs. US(CC) with smallest PCC (0.44) and ICC (0.42).

          Conclusions

          Residual motion detected during spirometry induced DIBH is small. SGRT alone is no sufficient surrogate for residual internal motion in all patients as some high velocity motion could not be detected. Observed patient-specific residual errors may require individualized PTV-margins.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

              Reliability coefficients often take the form of intraclass correlation coefficients. In this article, guidelines are given for choosing among six different forms of the intraclass correlation for reliability studies in which n target are rated by k judges. Relevant to the choice of the coefficient are the appropriate statistical model for the reliability and the application to be made of the reliability results. Confidence intervals for each of the forms are reviewed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol
                Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol
                Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
                Elsevier
                2405-6316
                05 June 2023
                July 2023
                05 June 2023
                : 27
                : 100455
                Affiliations
                [a ]University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
                [b ]University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
                [c ]Departemen Fisika, FMIPA, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia
                [d ]Struttura Complessa di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Oncologia, Az. Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41122 Modena, Italy
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. lena.kaestner@ 123456umm.de
                [1]

                Contributed equally to this publication.

                Article
                S2405-6316(23)00046-5 100455
                10.1016/j.phro.2023.100455
                10500027
                37720462
                74055765-aaa9-4471-9f2b-1a23c7393224
                © 2023 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 2 January 2023
                : 30 May 2023
                : 31 May 2023
                Categories
                Original Research Article

                sbrt,dibh (deep-inspiration-breath-hold),ultrasound-based monitoring,sgrt (surface-guided radiotherapy)

                Comments

                Comment on this article