52
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The health effects of vitamin D supplementation: evidence from human studies

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Vitamin D supplementation can prevent and cure nutritional rickets in infants and children. Preclinical and observational data suggest that the vitamin D endocrine system has a wide spectrum of skeletal and extra-skeletal activities. There is consensus that severe vitamin D deficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentration <30 nmol/l) should be corrected, whereas most guidelines recommend serum 25OHD concentrations of >50 nmol/l for optimal bone health in older adults. However, the causal link between vitamin D and many extra-skeletal outcomes remains unclear. The VITAL, ViDA and D2d randomized clinical trials (combined number of participants >30,000) indicated that vitamin D supplementation of vitamin D-replete adults (baseline serum 25OHD >50 nmol/l) does not prevent cancer, cardiovascular events, falls or progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus. Post hoc analysis has suggested some extra-skeletal benefits for individuals with vitamin D deficiency. Over 60 Mendelian randomization studies, designed to minimize bias from confounding, have evaluated the consequences of lifelong genetically lowered serum 25OHD concentrations on various outcomes and most studies have found null effects. Four Mendelian randomization studies found an increased risk of multiple sclerosis in individuals with genetically lowered serum 25OHD concentrations. In conclusion, supplementation of vitamin D-replete individuals does not provide demonstrable health benefits. This conclusion does not contradict older guidelines that severe vitamin D deficiency should be prevented or corrected.

          Abstract

          This Review highlights results from large randomized clinical trials performed during the period 2017–2020 and Mendelian randomization studies on vitamin D levels. Together, findings indicate that vitamin D supplementation alone in vitamin D-replete adults does not provide health benefits; however, vitamin D deficiency should always be corrected.

          Key points

          • Vitamin D and calcium supplementation can cure nutritional rickets and can modestly decrease the risk of major fractures in older adults with poor vitamin D status or calcium intake.

          • Large supplementation trials recruiting vitamin D-replete adults (serum 25OHD concentration >50 nmol/l) have demonstrated no effects on the incidence of cancer, cardiovascular events or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and no benefits in terms of bone density and the risk of falls.

          • Post-hoc analysis of large supplementation trials has suggested that supplementation of individuals with vitamin D deficiency modestly delays age-related bone loss and progression to T2DM, and improves lung function.

          • A meta-analysis suggested that vitamin D supplementation results in a modest decrease in cancer mortality.

          • Over 60 Mendelian randomization studies have examined causal links between genetically lower vitamin D levels and health outcomes; most studies generated null effects except four studies that demonstrated an increased risk of multiple sclerosis.

          • In conclusion, supplementation of vitamin D-replete individuals does not generate overall health benefits; however, correction of severe vitamin D deficiency remains essential.

          Related collections

          Most cited references123

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline.

          The objective was to provide guidelines to clinicians for the evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency with an emphasis on the care of patients who are at risk for deficiency. The Task Force was composed of a Chair, six additional experts, and a methodologist. The Task Force received no corporate funding or remuneration. Consensus was guided by systematic reviews of evidence and discussions during several conference calls and e-mail communications. The draft prepared by the Task Force was reviewed successively by The Endocrine Society's Clinical Guidelines Subcommittee, Clinical Affairs Core Committee, and cosponsoring associations, and it was posted on The Endocrine Society web site for member review. At each stage of review, the Task Force received written comments and incorporated needed changes. Considering that vitamin D deficiency is very common in all age groups and that few foods contain vitamin D, the Task Force recommended supplementation at suggested daily intake and tolerable upper limit levels, depending on age and clinical circumstances. The Task Force also suggested the measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level by a reliable assay as the initial diagnostic test in patients at risk for deficiency. Treatment with either vitamin D(2) or vitamin D(3) was recommended for deficient patients. At the present time, there is not sufficient evidence to recommend screening individuals who are not at risk for deficiency or to prescribe vitamin D to attain the noncalcemic benefit for cardiovascular protection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Vitamin D Supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease

            It is unclear whether supplementation with vitamin D reduces the risk of cancer or cardiovascular disease, and data from randomized trials are limited.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial.

              Improving vitamin D status may be an important modifiable risk factor to reduce falls and fractures; however, adherence to daily supplementation is typically poor. To determine whether a single annual dose of 500,000 IU of cholecalciferol administered orally to older women in autumn or winter would improve adherence and reduce the risk of falls and fracture. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 2256 community-dwelling women, aged 70 years or older, considered to be at high risk of fracture were recruited from June 2003 to June 2005 and were randomly assigned to receive cholecalciferol or placebo each autumn to winter for 3 to 5 years. The study concluded in 2008. 500,000 IU of cholecalciferol or placebo. Falls and fractures were ascertained using monthly calendars; details were confirmed by telephone interview. Fractures were radiologically confirmed. In a substudy, 137 randomly selected participants underwent serial blood sampling for 25-hydroxycholecalciferol and parathyroid hormone levels. Women in the cholecalciferol (vitamin D) group had 171 fractures vs 135 in the placebo group; 837 women in the vitamin D group fell 2892 times (rate, 83.4 per 100 person-years) while 769 women in the placebo group fell 2512 times (rate, 72.7 per 100 person-years; incidence rate ratio [RR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.30; P = .03). The incidence RR for fracture in the vitamin D group was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.00-1.59; P = .047) vs the placebo group (rates per 100 person-years, 4.9 vitamin D vs 3.9 placebo). A temporal pattern was observed in a post hoc analysis of falls. The incidence RR of falling in the vitamin D group vs the placebo group was 1.31 in the first 3 months after dosing and 1.13 during the following 9 months (test for homogeneity; P = .02). In the substudy, the median baseline serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol was 49 nmol/L. Less than 3% of the substudy participants had 25-hydroxycholecalciferol levels lower than 25 nmol/L. In the vitamin D group, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol levels increased at 1 month after dosing to approximately 120 nmol/L, were approximately 90 nmol/L at 3 months, and remained higher than the placebo group 12 months after dosing. Among older community-dwelling women, annual oral administration of high-dose cholecalciferol resulted in an increased risk of falls and fractures. anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12605000658617; isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN83409867.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Roger.Bouillon@kuleuven.be
                Journal
                Nat Rev Endocrinol
                Nat Rev Endocrinol
                Nature Reviews. Endocrinology
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                1759-5029
                1759-5037
                23 November 2021
                : 1-15
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.5596.f, ISNI 0000 0001 0668 7884, Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, , KU Leuven, ; Leuven, Belgium
                [2 ]GRID grid.14848.31, ISNI 0000 0001 2292 3357, Research Center of the Sainte-Justine University Hospital, , University of Montreal, Montreal, ; Quebec, Canada
                [3 ]GRID grid.416311.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0433 3945, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, ; Scarborough, ME USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.5645.2, ISNI 000000040459992X, Department of Internal Medicine, , Erasmus MC University Medical Center, ; Rotterdam, Netherlands
                [5 ]GRID grid.5645.2, ISNI 000000040459992X, Translational Skeletal Genomics, Department of Internal Medicine, , Erasmus MC University Medical Center, ; Rotterdam, Netherlands
                [6 ]GRID grid.414980.0, ISNI 0000 0000 9401 2774, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, , Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, ; Montreal, Quebec Canada
                [7 ]GRID grid.14709.3b, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8649, Departments of Medicine, Human Genetics, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, , McGill University, ; Montreal, Quebec Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6446-3763
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3436-8199
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9435-9441
                Article
                593
                10.1038/s41574-021-00593-z
                8609267
                34815552
                73ff3e99-45e8-41fd-8f18-cac848f61320
                © Springer Nature Limited 2021

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 25 October 2021
                Categories
                Review Article

                endocrine system,endocrine system and metabolic diseases

                Comments

                Comment on this article