2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The clinical manifestations and molecular pathogenesis of radiation fibrosis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Advances in radiation techniques have enabled the precise delivery of higher doses of radiotherapy to tumours, while sparing surrounding healthy tissues. Consequently, the incidence of radiation toxicities has declined, and will likely continue to improve as radiotherapy further evolves. Nonetheless, ionizing radiation elicits tissue-specific toxicities that gradually develop into radiation-induced fibrosis, a common long-term side-effect of radiotherapy. Radiation fibrosis is characterized by an aberrant wound repair process, which promotes the deposition of extensive scar tissue, clinically manifesting as a loss of elasticity, tissue thickening, and organ-specific functional consequences. In addition to improving the existing technologies and guidelines directing the administration of radiotherapy, understanding the pathogenesis underlying radiation fibrosis is essential for the success of cancer treatments. This review integrates the principles for radiotherapy dosimetry to minimize off-target effects, the tissue-specific clinical manifestations, the key cellular and molecular drivers of radiation fibrosis, and emerging therapeutic opportunities for both prevention and treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references173

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression.

          Cellular senescence is a tumor-suppressive mechanism that permanently arrests cells at risk for malignant transformation. However, accumulating evidence shows that senescent cells can have deleterious effects on the tissue microenvironment. The most significant of these effects is the acquisition of a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) that turns senescent fibroblasts into proinflammatory cells that have the ability to promote tumor progression.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis.

            T A Wynn (2008)
            Fibrosis is defined by the overgrowth, hardening, and/or scarring of various tissues and is attributed to excess deposition of extracellular matrix components including collagen. Fibrosis is the end result of chronic inflammatory reactions induced by a variety of stimuli including persistent infections, autoimmune reactions, allergic responses, chemical insults, radiation, and tissue injury. Although current treatments for fibrotic diseases such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, systemic sclerosis, progressive kidney disease, and cardiovascular fibrosis typically target the inflammatory response, there is accumulating evidence that the mechanisms driving fibrogenesis are distinct from those regulating inflammation. In fact, some studies have suggested that ongoing inflammation is needed to reverse established and progressive fibrosis. The key cellular mediator of fibrosis is the myofibroblast, which when activated serves as the primary collagen-producing cell. Myofibroblasts are generated from a variety of sources including resident mesenchymal cells, epithelial and endothelial cells in processes termed epithelial/endothelial-mesenchymal (EMT/EndMT) transition, as well as from circulating fibroblast-like cells called fibrocytes that are derived from bone-marrow stem cells. Myofibroblasts are activated by a variety of mechanisms, including paracrine signals derived from lymphocytes and macrophages, autocrine factors secreted by myofibroblasts, and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPS) produced by pathogenic organisms that interact with pattern recognition receptors (i.e. TLRs) on fibroblasts. Cytokines (IL-13, IL-21, TGF-beta1), chemokines (MCP-1, MIP-1beta), angiogenic factors (VEGF), growth factors (PDGF), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), acute phase proteins (SAP), caspases, and components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (ANG II) have been identified as important regulators of fibrosis and are being investigated as potential targets of antifibrotic drugs. This review explores our current understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrogenesis. 2007 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic.

              The Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) review summarizes the currently available three-dimensional dose/volume/outcome data to update and refine the normal tissue dose/volume tolerance guidelines provided by the classic Emami et al. paper published in 1991. A "clinician's view" on using the QUANTEC information in a responsible manner is presented along with a description of the most commonly used normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. A summary of organ-specific dose/volume/outcome data, based on the QUANTEC reviews, is included. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                eBioMedicine
                EBioMedicine
                eBioMedicine
                Elsevier
                2352-3964
                05 April 2024
                May 2024
                05 April 2024
                : 103
                : 105089
                Affiliations
                [a ]Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [b ]Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [c ]Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [d ]Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [e ]Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
                [f ]Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [g ]Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto M5G 2M9, Canada. fei-fei.liu@ 123456rmp.uhn.ca
                Article
                S2352-3964(24)00124-5 105089
                10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105089
                11002813
                38579363
                73d56ff6-247e-4df6-9343-1f79c0962ac7
                © 2024 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 8 January 2024
                : 25 February 2024
                : 12 March 2024
                Categories
                Review

                radiation fibrosis,radiotherapy,extracellular matrix,experimental therapeutics,dosimetry constraints

                Comments

                Comment on this article