1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Radiation-induced lung injury after breast cancer treatment: incidence in the CANTO-RT cohort and associated clinical and dosimetric risk factors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) is strongly associated with various clinical conditions and dosimetric parameters. Former studies have led to reducing radiotherapy (RT) doses to the lung and have favored the discontinuation of tamoxifen during RT. However, the monocentric design and variability of dosimetric parameters chosen have limited further improvement. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence of RILI in current practice and to determine clinical and dosimetric risk factors associated with RILI occurrence.

          Material and methods

          Data from 3 out of the 10 top recruiting centers in CANTO-RT, a subset of the CANTO prospective longitudinal cohort (NCT01993498), were retrospectively analyzed for RILI occurrence. This cohort, which recruited invasive cT0-3 cN0-3 M0 breast cancer patients from 2012 to 2018, prospectively recorded the occurrence of adverse events by questionnaires and medical visits at the end of, and up to 60 months after treatment. RILI adverse events were defined in all patients by the association of clinical symptoms and compatible medical imaging.

          Results

          RILI was found in 38/1565 (2.4%) patients. Grade II RILI represented 15/38 events (39%) and grade III or IV 2/38 events (6%). There were no grade V events. The most frequently used technique for treatment was 3D conformational RT (96%). In univariable analyses, we confirmed the association of RILI occurrence with pulmonary medical history, absence of cardiovascular disease medical history, high pT and pN, chemotherapy use, nodal RT. All dosimetric parameters were highly correlated and had close predictive value. In the multivariable analysis adjusted for chemotherapy use and nodal involvement, pulmonary medical history (OR=3.05, p<0.01) and high V30 Gy (OR=1.06, p=0.04) remained statistically significant risk factors for RILI occurrence. V30 Gy >15% was significantly associated with RILI occurrence in a multivariable analysis (OR=3.07, p=0.03).

          Conclusion

          Our study confirms the pulmonary safety of breast 3D RT in CANTO-RT. Further analyses with modern radiation therapy techniques such as IMRT are needed. Our results argue in favor of a dose constraint to the ipsilateral lung using V30 Gy not exceeding 15%, especially in patients presenting pulmonary medical history. Pulmonary disease records should be taken into account for RT planning.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Radiation dose-volume effects in the lung.

          The three-dimensional dose, volume, and outcome data for lung are reviewed in detail. The rate of symptomatic pneumonitis is related to many dosimetric parameters, and there are no evident threshold "tolerance dose-volume" levels. There are strong volume and fractionation effects. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of two randomised controlled trials.

            5-year results of the UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials suggested that lower total doses of radiotherapy delivered in fewer, larger doses (fractions) are at least as safe and effective as the historical standard regimen (50 Gy in 25 fractions) for women after primary surgery for early breast cancer. In this prespecified analysis, we report the 10-year follow-up of the START trials testing 13 fraction and 15 fraction regimens. From 1999 to 2002, women with completely excised invasive breast cancer (pT1-3a, pN0-1, M0) were enrolled from 35 UK radiotherapy centres. Patients were randomly assigned to a treatment regimen after primary surgery followed by chemotherapy and endocrine treatment (where prescribed). Randomisation was computer-generated and stratified by centre, type of primary surgery (breast-conservation surgery or mastectomy), and tumour bed boost radiotherapy. In START-A, a regimen of 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks was compared with 41·6 Gy or 39 Gy in 13 fractions over 5 weeks. In START-B, a regimen of 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks was compared with 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks. Eligibility criteria included age older than 18 years and no immediate surgical reconstruction. Primary endpoints were local-regional tumour relapse and late normal tissue effects. Analysis was by intention to treat. Follow-up data are still being collected. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN59368779. START-A enrolled 2236 women. Median follow-up was 9·3 years (IQR 8·0-10·0), after which 139 local-regional relapses had occurred. 10-year rates of local-regional relapse did not differ significantly between the 41·6 Gy and 50 Gy regimen groups (6·3%, 95% CI 4·7-8·5 vs 7·4%, 5·5-10·0; hazard ratio [HR] 0·91, 95% CI 0·59-1·38; p=0·65) or the 39 Gy (8·8%, 95% CI 6·7-11·4) and 50 Gy regimen groups (HR 1·18, 95% CI 0·79-1·76; p=0·41). In START-A, moderate or marked breast induration, telangiectasia, and breast oedema were significantly less common normal tissue effects in the 39 Gy group than in the 50 Gy group. Normal tissue effects did not differ significantly between 41·6 Gy and 50 Gy groups. START-B enrolled 2215 women. Median follow-up was 9·9 years (IQR 7·5-10·1), after which 95 local-regional relapses had occurred. The proportion of patients with local-regional relapse at 10 years did not differ significantly between the 40 Gy group (4·3%, 95% CI 3·2-5·9) and the 50 Gy group (5·5%, 95% CI 4·2-7·2; HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·51-1·16; p=0·21). In START-B, breast shrinkage, telangiectasia, and breast oedema were significantly less common normal tissue effects in the 40 Gy group than in the 50 Gy group. Long-term follow-up confirms that appropriately dosed hypofractionated radiotherapy is safe and effective for patients with early breast cancer. The results support the continued use of 40 Gy in 15 fractions, which has already been adopted by most UK centres as the standard of care for women requiring adjuvant radiotherapy for invasive early breast cancer. Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council, UK Department of Health. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predicting radiation pneumonitis after chemoradiation therapy for lung cancer: an international individual patient data meta-analysis.

              Radiation pneumonitis is a dose-limiting toxicity for patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis to determine factors predictive of clinically significant pneumonitis. After a systematic review of the literature, data were obtained on 836 patients who underwent CCRT in Europe, North America, and Asia. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets (two-thirds vs one-third of patients). Factors predictive of symptomatic pneumonitis (grade ≥2 by 1 of several scoring systems) or fatal pneumonitis were evaluated using logistic regression. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to define risk groups. The median radiation therapy dose was 60 Gy, and the median follow-up time was 2.3 years. Most patients received concurrent cisplatin/etoposide (38%) or carboplatin/paclitaxel (26%). The overall rate of symptomatic pneumonitis was 29.8% (n=249), with fatal pneumonitis in 1.9% (n=16). In the training set, factors predictive of symptomatic pneumonitis were lung volume receiving ≥20 Gy (V(20)) (odds ratio [OR] 1.03 per 1% increase, P=.008), and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy (OR 3.33, P 0.65). On RPA, the highest risk of pneumonitis (>50%) was in patients >65 years of age receiving carboplatin/paclitaxel. Predictors of fatal pneumonitis were daily dose >2 Gy, V(20), and lower-lobe tumor location. Several treatment-related risk factors predict the development of symptomatic pneumonitis, and elderly patients who undergo CCRT with carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy are at highest risk. Fatal pneumonitis, although uncommon, is related to dosimetric factors and tumor location. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                29 June 2023
                2023
                : 13
                : 1199043
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Gustave Roussy, Radiation Therapy Department , Villejuif, France
                [2] 2 Tenon Hospital, Radiotherapy Department , Paris, France
                [3] 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie , Paris, France
                [4] 4 University Versailles , St. Quentin, France
                [5] 5 Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie , Saint Cloud, France
                [6] 6 Gustave Roussy, Comprehensive Cancer Research Center , Villejuif, France
                [7] 7 Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) , Villejuif, France
                [8] 8 Paris-Saclay University, Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1018 , Villejuif, France
                [9] 9 UNICANCER, Data Department , Kremlin Bicêtre, France
                [10] 10 Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) 1030 , Villejuif, France
                [11] 11 Radiation Therapy Department, CH Victor Dupouy , Argenteuil, France
                [12] 12 Montpellier University , Montpellier, France
                [13] 13 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1194 , Montpellier, France
                [14] 14 Fédération Universitaire d’Oncologie Radiothérapie d’Occitanie Méditerranée, Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier (ICM) , Montpellier, France
                [15] 15 Radiation Therapy Department, Henri Becquerel Center , Rouen, France
                [16] 16 Centre Oscar Lambret, Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, 3 rue Combemale , Lille, France
                [17] 17 Univ. Lille, &, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centrale Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 9189 – Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille (CRIStAL) , Lille, France
                [18] 18 Radiotherapy Department, Centre Léon Bérard , Lyon, France
                [19] 19 Radiotherapy Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest , Nantes, France
                [20] 20 Nantes Université, Nantes - Angers Cancer and Immunology Research Center (CRCI2NA), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) , Nantes, France
                [21] 21 Gustave Roussy, Medical Oncology Department , Villejuif, France
                [22] 22 Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U981 , Villejuif, France
                [23] 23 Avicenne Hospital, Thoracic Oncology , Bobigny, France
                Author notes

                Edited by: Pelagia G. Tsoutsou, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève (HUG), Switzerland

                Reviewed by: Filip Kassak, University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland; Ivica Ratosa, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia

                *Correspondence: Sofia Rivera, sofia.rivera@ 123456gustaveroussy.fr
                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2023.1199043
                10342531
                73c7ba7e-fbcd-4f13-b7b7-32da48264557
                Copyright © 2023 Gueiderikh, Sarrade, Kirova, De La Lande, De Vathaire, Auzac, Martin, Everhard, Meillan, Bourgier, Benyoucef, Lacornerie, Pasquier, Racadot, Moignier, Paris, André, Deutsch, Duchemann, Allodji and Rivera

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 02 April 2023
                : 26 May 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 35, Pages: 12, Words: 5977
                Funding
                This research was supported by the French Government under the “Investment for the Future” program managed by the National Research Agency (ANR), grant n° ANR-10-COHO-0004” and by the association “La Ligue contre le Cancer”.
                Categories
                Oncology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Radiation Oncology

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                radio-induced lung injury,lug fibrosis,breast cancer,radiation therapy,canto cohort,rili,dosimetric analyses

                Comments

                Comment on this article