86
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    19
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years

      , , , , ,
      Annals of Oncology
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite the abundant literature on this topic, accurate prevalence estimates of pain in cancer patients are not available. We investigated the prevalence of pain in cancer patients according to the different disease stages and types of cancer. A systematic review of the literature was conducted. An instrument especially designed for judging prevalence studies on their methodological quality was used. Methodologically acceptable articles were used in the meta-analyses. Fifty-two studies were used in the meta-analysis. Pooled prevalence rates of pain were calculated for four subgroups: (i) studies including patients after curative treatment, 33% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21% to 46%]; (ii) studies including patients under anticancer treatment: 59% (CI 44% to 73%); (iii) studies including patients characterised as advanced/metastatic/terminal disease, 64% (CI 58% to 69%) and (iii) studies including patients at all disease stages, 53% (CI 43% to 63%). Of the patients with pain more than one-third graded their pain as moderate or severe. Pooled prevalence of pain was >50% in all cancer types with the highest prevalence in head/neck cancer patients (70%; 95% CI 51% to 88%). Despite the clear World Health Organisation recommendations, cancer pain still is a major problem.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Annals of Oncology
          Annals of Oncology
          Oxford University Press (OUP)
          09237534
          September 2007
          September 2007
          : 18
          : 9
          : 1437-1449
          Article
          10.1093/annonc/mdm056
          17355955
          736a5e4e-f513-4b7e-a50d-7a00d1356447
          © 2007

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article