128
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    2
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Energy and Human Health

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Energy use is central to human society and provides many health benefits. But each source of energy entails some health risks. This article reviews the health impacts of each major source of energy, focusing on those with major implications for the burden of disease globally. The biggest health impacts accrue to the harvesting and burning of solid fuels, coal and biomass, mainly in the form of occupational health risks and household and general ambient air pollution. Lack of access to clean fuels and electricity in the world's poor households is a particularly serious risk for health. Although energy efficiency brings many benefits, it also entails some health risks, as do renewable energy systems, if not managed carefully. We do not review health impacts of climate change itself, which are due mostly to climate-altering pollutants from energy systems, but do discuss the potential for achieving near-term health cobenefits by reducing certain climate-related emissions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references163

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

          The Lancet, 380(9859), 2224-2260
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Climate Change 2007

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Schistosomiasis and water resources development: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimates of people at risk.

              An estimated 779 million people are at risk of schistosomiasis, of whom 106 million (13.6%) live in irrigation schemes or in close proximity to large dam reservoirs. We identified 58 studies that examined the relation between water resources development projects and schistosomiasis, primarily in African settings. We present a systematic literature review and meta-analysis with the following objectives: (1) to update at-risk populations of schistosomiasis and number of people infected in endemic countries, and (2) to quantify the risk of water resources development and management on schistosomiasis. Using 35 datasets from 24 African studies, our meta-analysis showed pooled random risk ratios of 2.4 and 2.6 for urinary and intestinal schistosomiasis, respectively, among people living adjacent to dam reservoirs. The risk ratio estimate for studies evaluating the effect of irrigation on urinary schistosomiasis was in the range 0.02-7.3 (summary estimate 1.1) and that on intestinal schistosomiasis in the range 0.49-23.0 (summary estimate 4.7). Geographic stratification showed important spatial differences, idiosyncratic to the type of water resources development. We conclude that the development and management of water resources is an important risk factor for schistosomiasis, and hence strategies to mitigate negative effects should become integral parts in the planning, implementation, and operation of future water projects.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Annual Review of Public Health
                Annu. Rev. Public Health
                Annual Reviews
                0163-7525
                1545-2093
                March 18 2013
                March 18 2013
                : 34
                : 1
                : 159-188
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Public Health,
                [2 ]School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195; email:
                [3 ]Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai-600116, India; email:
                [4 ]Discipline of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; email:
                [5 ]Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-7360; email: ,
                [6 ]Independent Consultant on Radioactivity in the Environment, United Kingdom; email:
                [7 ]Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032; email:
                [8 ]Center for Global Health Research, Umeå University, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden; and National Center for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200 Australia; email:
                [9 ]Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544; email:
                [10 ]Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720; email:
                [11 ]National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia; email:
                [12 ]Independent Consultant on Energy and Nuclear Policy, Paris, France; email:
                Article
                10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114404
                23330697
                73398475-947d-41c7-adba-ff5a8ca9e9a0
                © 2013
                History

                Earth & Environmental sciences,Environmental change,General environmental science,Health & Social care,Public health,Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article