42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This research demonstrates how promoting the environment can negatively affect adoption of energy efficiency in the United States because of the political polarization surrounding environmental issues. Study 1 demonstrated that more politically conservative individuals were less in favor of investment in energy-efficient technology than were those who were more politically liberal. This finding was driven primarily by the lessened psychological value that more conservative individuals placed on reducing carbon emissions. Study 2 showed that this difference has consequences: In a real-choice context, more conservative individuals were less likely to purchase a more expensive energy-efficient light bulb when it was labeled with an environmental message than when it was unlabeled. These results highlight the importance of taking into account psychological value-based considerations in the individual adoption of energy-efficient technology in the United States and beyond.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Toward a universal psychological structure of human values.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation.

            Why do people purchase proenvironmental "green" products? We argue that buying such products can be construed as altruistic, since green products often cost more and are of lower quality than their conventional counterparts, but green goods benefit the environment for everyone. Because biologists have observed that altruism might function as a "costly signal" associated with status, we examined in 3 experiments how status motives influenced desire for green products. Activating status motives led people to choose green products over more luxurious nongreen products. Supporting the notion that altruism signals one's willingness and ability to incur costs for others' benefit, status motives increased desire for green products when shopping in public (but not private) and when green products cost more (but not less) than nongreen products. Findings suggest that status competition can be used to promote proenvironmental behavior.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
                1091-6490
                0027-8424
                Jun 04 2013
                : 110
                : 23
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Operations and Information Management Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. denag@wharton.upenn.edu
                Article
                1218453110
                10.1073/pnas.1218453110
                3677426
                23630266
                731ee99a-1114-45de-acf2-53f46d4d7616
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article