142
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers.

      Anesthesiology
      Adult, Alfentanil, pharmacology, Anesthetics, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Isoflurane, Male, Memory, drug effects, Midazolam, Probability, Propofol

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The bispectral index (BIS), a value derived from the electroencephalograph (EEG), has been proposed as a measure of anesthetic effect. To establish its utility for this purpose, it is important to determine the relation among BIS, measured drug concentration, and increasing levels of sedation. This study was designed to evaluate this relation for four commonly used anesthetic drugs: propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil. Seventy-two consenting volunteers were studied at four institutions. Volunteers were given either isoflurane, propofol, midazolam, or alfentanil. Each volunteer was administered a dose-ranging sequence of one of the study drugs to achieve predetermined target concentrations. A frontal montage was used for continuous recording of the EEG. At each pseudo-steady-state drug concentration, a BIS score was recorded, the participant was shown either a picture or given a word to recall, an arterial blood sample was obtained for subsequent analysis of drug concentration, and the participant was evaluated for level of sedation as determined by the responsiveness portion of the observer's assessment of the alertness/ sedation scale (OAAS). An OAAS score of 2 or less was considered unconscious. The BIS (version 2.5) score was recorded in real-time and the BIS (version 3.0) was subsequently derived off-line from the recorded raw EEG data. The relation among BIS, measured drug concentration, responsiveness score, and presence or absence of recall was determined by linear and logistic regression for both the individual drugs and, when appropriate, for the pooled results. The prediction probability was also calculated. The BIS score (r = 0.883) correlated significantly better than the measured propofol concentration (r = -0.778; P < 0.05) with the responsiveness score. The BIS provided as effective correlation with responsiveness score of the OAAS as did the measured concentration for midazolam and isoflurane. None of the volunteers given alfentanil lost consciousness and thus were excluded from the pooled analysis. The pooled BIS values at which 50% and 95% of participants were unconscious were 67 and 50, respectively. The prediction probability values for BIS ranged from 0.885-0.976, indicating a very high predictive performance for correctly indicating probability of loss of consciousness. The BIS both correlated well with the level of responsiveness and provided an excellent prediction of the loss of consciousness. These results imply that BIS may be a valuable monitor of the level of sedation and loss of consciousness for propofol, midazolam, and isoflurane.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Exaggerated anesthetic requirements in the preferentially anesthetized brain.

          The brain is assumed to be the site of anesthetic action, but anesthetics have effects elsewhere, such as the spinal cord. A preferentially anesthetized goat brain model was used to determine the importance of anesthetic action in the brain. Six goats were anesthetized with isoflurane; after tracheal intubation and insertion of a femoral arterial catheter, bilateral neck dissections were performed to isolate the external carotid arteries and external jugular veins. The occipital arteries were ligated to prevent vertebral blood from entering the carotid system. (Goats do not have direct, significant vertebral artery contributions to the brain, and they lack internal jugular veins.) Control isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) was determined using a dew-claw clamp as the painful stimulus. Following this, cranial venous blood was drained into a bubble oxygenator in which an isoflurane vaporizer was placed in line with the gas flow. Oxygenator arterial isoflurane concentration was estimated from the isoflurane partial pressure in the oxygenator exhaust. Isoflurane administration via the lungs was discontinued and the isoflurane partial pressure in the blood delivered via the carotid artery was increased by an amount required to bracket the partial pressures permitting and preventing movement in response to dew-claw stimulation. The native circulation was reestablished and MAC determined again. Cerebral isoflurane requirements were 1.2 +/- 0.3% (mean +/- SD) before bypass, increased to 2.9 +/- 0.7% during bypass when the brain was preferentially anesthetized, and decreased to 1.3 +/- 0.1% after bypass. The results support the importance of subcortical structures, such as the spinal cord, in the generation of purposeful movement in response to a painful stimulus under general anesthesia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Anesthetic potency (MAC) is independent of forebrain structures in the rat.

            The ability of general anesthetics to suppress somatomotor responses to surgical incision and other noxious stimuli is of particular clinical relevance. When the blockade is due to inhaled agents, this effect can be quantified as the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC), i.e., that concentration that blocks movement evoked by a noxious stimulus (ED50). To identify the neural structures that subtend this somatomotor response, we anesthetized 14 rats with isoflurane in oxygen and performed bilateral parietal-temporal craniotomies. In each rat, MAC was repeatedly tested using tail-clamping and Dixon's up-down concentration technique. After determination of baseline MAC, seven rats underwent aspiration decerebration, after which MAC was repeatedly measured. In the control group (N = 7), MAC (mean +/- SD) remained constant at 1.30 +/- 0.25% for more than 6 h. In the seven rats that underwent aspiration decerebration, baseline MAC was 1.26 +/- 0.14%. These seven rats with histologically validated precollicular decerebration demonstrated no change in MAC relative to control rats, as much as 11 h after decerebration (P = 0.14). These findings suggest that the anesthetic-induced unresponsiveness to noxious stimuli measured by MAC testing does not depend on cortical or forebrain structures in the rat.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computer-controlled infusion pump.

              Fentanyl was administered to 21 patients using a computer-controlled infusion pump (CCIP) based on a pharmacokinetic model. Eleven of the patients were dosed according to the pharmacokinetics described by McClain and Hug, and ten of the patients were dosed according to the pharmacokinetics described by Scott and Stanski. The authors measured the difference between the measured arterial fentanyl concentrations and the concentrations predicted by the CCIP for each pharmacokinetic parameter set. The median absolute performance error (MDAPE) in patients dosed according to McClain and Hug's parameters was 61%, and the MDAPE in patients dosed according to Scott and Stanski's parameters was 33%. The population pharmacokinetics in these 21 patients were analyzed using a pooled data technique. The pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in this population showed a smaller central compartment volume and a more rapid initial distribution half-life than previously estimated for fentanyl. The derived pharmacokinetic parameters described these patients well and also predicted the observed fentanyl concentrations from four previously published fentanyl studies with reasonable accuracy. Comparison of the parameters used by the authors with those of McClain and Hug demonstrated that dosing regimens designed from pharmacokinetic models can be fairly accurate at the times sampled in the original study but may not be accurate at time points not sampled in the original research. The authors concluded that although the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by CCIP are the same as the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by a bolus or constant rate infusion, a pharmacokinetic study using a CCIP may be particularly effective at characterizing the most rapid distribution pharmacokinetic parameters, and thus may provide parameters appropriate for subsequent use in a CCIP.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9105228
                10.1097/00000542-199704000-00014

                Chemistry
                Adult,Alfentanil,pharmacology,Anesthetics,Electroencephalography,Female,Humans,Hypnotics and Sedatives,Isoflurane,Male,Memory,drug effects,Midazolam,Probability,Propofol

                Comments

                Comment on this article