0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      From darkness to twilight: Morphological divergence between cave and surface‐subterranean ecotone Niphargus species

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Subterranean and surface habitats are in stark contrast in several environmental factors. Therefore, adaptation to the subterranean environment typically impedes the (re)colonisation of surface habitats. The genus Niphargus includes amphipod crustaceans that primarily occupy subterranean habitats. All its species show typical adaptations to the subterranean environment. However, some Niphargus species occur in surface‐subterranean ecotones. To understand whether (i) habitat‐based phenotypic divergence is present between the cave and the ecotone species and (ii) similar phenotypes emerge independently in each ecotone, we studied morphological divergence between four cave and four ecotone Niphargus species based on 13 functional morphological traits. To account for different selection acting on the sexes, we included both males ( N = 244) and females ( N = 222). Nine out of 13 traits showed habitat‐divergence. Traits related to feeding and crawling were shorter, while traits related to oxygenation were larger in ecotone species. Eleven out of 13 traits were sexually dimorphic. Traits related to oxygenation and crawling were larger in females, while the trait related to swimming was larger in males. We found that the extent of sexual dimorphism differs between the habitats in eight traits related to sensing, feeding, oxygenation and crawling. Additionally, we found that in certain traits related to sensing and oxygenation, habitat‐related differences are only present in one sex, but not the other. We conclude that the detected differences between the cave and the ecotone species indicate divergent evolution, where similarities among the different species within habitat type indicate convergent evolution. The high degree of sexual dimorphism paired with differences in sexual dimorphism between the habitats in certain traits suggest that sexual and fecundity selections have comparable effects to environmental selection. Thus, studies of habitat‐dependent adaptations investigating one sex only, or not considering sexual dimorphism, can lead to erroneous conclusions.

          Abstract

          The genus Niphargus comprises species primarily dwelling in the subterranean environment, but some of them colonised surface‐subterranean ecotones. Comparing 13 morphological traits of cave‐ and ecotone‐dwelling species, we found strong habitat‐related divergence that also includes the extent of sexual dimorphism in certain cases. Our results suggest that an interplay among environmental, sexual and fecundity selection resulted in the observed patterns.

          Related collections

          Most cited references99

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          R: a language and environment for statistical computing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology

            The use of linear mixed effects models (LMMs) is increasingly common in the analysis of biological data. Whilst LMMs offer a flexible approach to modelling a broad range of data types, ecological data are often complex and require complex model structures, and the fitting and interpretation of such models is not always straightforward. The ability to achieve robust biological inference requires that practitioners know how and when to apply these tools. Here, we provide a general overview of current methods for the application of LMMs to biological data, and highlight the typical pitfalls that can be encountered in the statistical modelling process. We tackle several issues regarding methods of model selection, with particular reference to the use of information theory and multi-model inference in ecology. We offer practical solutions and direct the reader to key references that provide further technical detail for those seeking a deeper understanding. This overview should serve as a widely accessible code of best practice for applying LMMs to complex biological problems and model structures, and in doing so improve the robustness of conclusions drawn from studies investigating ecological and evolutionary questions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

              Mate choice by males has been recognized at least since Darwin's time, but its phylogenetic distribution and effect on the evolution of female phenotypes remain poorly known. Moreover, the relative importance of factors thought to underlie the evolution of male mate choice (especially parental investment and mate quality variance) is still unresolved. Here I synthesize the empirical evidence and theory pertaining to the evolution of male mate choice and sex role reversal in insects, and examine the potential for male mating preferences to generate sexual selection on female phenotypes. Although male mate choice has received relatively little empirical study, the available evidence suggests that it is widespread among insects (and other animals). In addition to 'precopulatory' male mate choice, some insects exhibit 'cryptic' male mate choice, varying the amount of resources allocated to mating on the basis of female mate quality. As predicted by theory, the most commonly observed male mating preferences are those that tend to maximize a male's expected fertilization success from each mating. Such preferences tend to favour female phenotypes associated with high fecundity or reduced sperm competition intensity. Among insect species there is wide variation in mechanisms used by males to assess female mate quality, some of which (e.g. probing, antennating or repeatedly mounting the female) may be difficult to distinguish from copulatory courtship. According to theory, selection for male choosiness is an increasing function of mate quality variance and those reproductive costs that reduce, with each mating, the number of subsequent matings that a male can perform ('mating investment') Conversely, choosiness is constrained by the costs of mate search and assessment, in combination with the accuracy of assessment of potential mates and of the distribution of mate qualities. Stronger selection for male choosiness may also be expected in systems where female fitness increases with each copulation than in systems where female fitness peaks at a small number of matings. This theoretical framework is consistent with most of the empirical evidence. Furthermore, a variety of observed male mating preferences have the potential to exert sexual selection on female phenotypes. However, because male insects typically choose females based on phenotypic indicators of fecundity such as body size, and these are usually amenable to direct visual or tactile assessment, male mate choice often tends to reinforce stronger vectors of fecundity or viability selection, and seldom results in the evolution of female display traits. Research on orthopterans has shown that complete sex role reversal (i.e. males choosy, females competitive) can occur when male parental investment limits female fecundity and reduces the potential rate of reproduction of males sufficiently to produce a female-biased operational sex ratio. By contrast, many systems exhibiting partial sex role reversal (i.e. males choosy and competitive) are not associated with elevated levels of male parental investment, reduced male reproductive rates, or reduced male bias in the operational sex ratio. Instead, large female mate quality variance resulting from factors such as strong last-male sperm precedence or large variance in female fecundity may select for both male choosiness and competitiveness in such systems. Thus, partial and complete sex role reversal do not merely represent different points along a continuum of increasing male parental investment, but may evolve via different evolutionary pathways.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                anna.biro@ttk.elte.hu
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                06 August 2024
                August 2024
                : 14
                : 8 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.v14.8 )
                : e70061
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary
                [ 2 ] HUN‐REN‐ELTE‐MTM Integrative Ecology Research Group Budapest Hungary
                [ 3 ] Doctoral School of Biology Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary
                [ 4 ] Department of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Anna Biró, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology, Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, Budapest H‐1117, Hungary.

                Email: anna.biro@ 123456ttk.elte.hu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8106-4716
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6372-387X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-5173
                Article
                ECE370061 ECE-2024-03-00626.R1
                10.1002/ece3.70061
                11301267
                39108570
                73081e2b-9b8d-4b0f-b0b1-4ce4af0f99a4
                © 2024 The Author(s). Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 June 2024
                : 27 March 2024
                : 10 July 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Pages: 12, Words: 9700
                Funding
                Funded by: Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Fund , doi 10.13039/501100011019;
                Award ID: PD 132041
                Funded by: Slovenian Agency for Research and Innovation
                Award ID: N1‐0069
                Award ID: J1‐2464
                Award ID: P1‐0184
                Funded by: Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Fund
                Award ID: SNN‐125627
                Categories
                Evolutionary Ecology
                Research Article
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                August 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.6 mode:remove_FC converted:06.08.2024

                Evolutionary Biology
                adaptation,amphipod,convergent evolution,crustacean,divergent evolution,sexual dimorphism,springs,subterranean habitat

                Comments

                Comment on this article