49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Children and young people’s perceptions of energy drinks: A qualitative study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Consumption of soft drinks is declining in many countries, yet energy drink sales continue to increase, particularly amongst young consumers. Little is currently known about the drivers behind these trends. Energy drinks are high in sugar and caffeine, and evidence indicates that regular or heavy use by under 18s is likely to be detrimental to health. This study aimed to explore children and young people’s attitudes and perceptions in relation to energy drinks in a UK context.

          Methods

          Eight focus groups were conducted with pupils aged 10–11 years (n = 20) and 13–14 years (n = 17) from four schools in northern England. A sub-sample also took part in a mapping exercise to generate further insights. Data were analysed using the constant comparative approach.

          Results

          Energy drinks were reportedly consumed in a variety of public and private places, generally linked to social activities, sports and computer gaming (particularly amongst boys). Participants demonstrated strong brand awareness and preferences that were linked to taste and perceived value for money. The relatively low price of energy drinks and their widespread availability were identified as key factors, along with gendered branding and marketing. Some participants demonstrated a critical approach to manufacturers’ claims and many were keen to become better informed, often through school- or peer-based interventions. Other potential interventions included age restrictions, voluntary schemes involving retailers and improved labelling.

          Conclusions

          The lack of a single dominant factor in participants’ consumption choices suggests that there is unlikely to be a ‘silver bullet’ in attempting to address this issue. However, the findings provide support for policy-level interventions that seek to change the behaviours of manufacturers and retailers as well as consumers, and actively involve children and young people where possible.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Patterns and trends of beverage consumption among children and adults in Great Britain, 1986-2009.

          Many dietary recommendations include reduction of excessive intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and other energy-rich beverages such as juices and alcohol. The present study examines surveys of both individual dietary intake data and household food expenditure surveys to provide a picture of patterns and trends in beverage intake and purchases in Great Britain from 1986 to 2009, and estimates the potential for pricing policy to promote more healthful beverage purchase patterns. In 2008-9, beverages accounted for 21, 14 and 18 % of daily energy intake for children aged 1·5-18 and 4-18 years, and adults (19-64 years), respectively. Since the 1990s, the most important shifts have been a reduction in consumption of high-fat dairy products and an increased consumption of fruit juices and reduced-fat milk among preschoolers, children and adolescents. Among adults, consumption of high-fat milk beverages, sweetened tea and coffee and other energy-containing drinks fell, but reduced-fat milk, alcohol (particularly beer) and fruit juice rose. In testing taxation as an option for shifting beverage purchase patterns, we calculate that a 10 % increase in the price of SSB could potentially result in a decrease of 7·5 ml/capita per d. A similar 10 % tax on high-fat milk is associated with a reduction of high-fat milk purchases by 5 ml/capita per d and increased reduced-fat milk purchase by 7 ml/capita per d. This analysis implies that taxation or other methods of shifting relative costs of these beverages could be a way to improve beverage choices in Great Britain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Soda and Tobacco Industry Corporate Social Responsibility Campaigns: How Do They Compare?

            In an article that forms part of the PLoS Medicine series on Big Food, Andrew Cheyne and colleagues compare soda companies' corporate social responsibility (CSR) campaigns - which are designed to bolster the image and popularity of their products and to prevent regulation - with the tobacco industry's CSR campaigning.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Energy drinks, soft drinks, and substance use among United States secondary school students.

              Examine energy drink/shot and regular and diet soft drink use among United States secondary school students in 2010-2011, and associations between such use and substance use.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                30 November 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 11
                : e0188668
                Affiliations
                [1 ] School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University Queen’s Campus, Stockton-on-Tees, United Kingdom
                [2 ] Fuse (UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health), Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
                [3 ] School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
                McMaster University, CANADA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9576-2689
                Article
                PONE-D-17-31844
                10.1371/journal.pone.0188668
                5708842
                29190753
                7304ed27-69cd-455a-a8b1-82054826faac
                © 2017 Visram et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 30 August 2017
                : 10 November 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Pages: 17
                Funding
                Funded by: The Children's Foundation
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265, Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: MR/K02325X/1
                This work was supported by The Children’s Foundation Child Health Research Programme (registered charity no. 1000013). SV, MC and AAL are members of Fuse (UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health) (MRC grant ref. no. MR/K02325X/1). Funding for Fuse comes from the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, and the National Institute for Health Research, under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration, and is gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily represent those of the funders or the UKCRC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Education
                Schools
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Communications
                Marketing
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Age Groups
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Recreation
                Games
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Recreation
                Sports
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Sports Science
                Sports
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Alcohol Consumption
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Alcohol Consumption
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Education and Awareness
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Qualitative Studies
                Custom metadata
                Due to ethical restrictions detailed in participant consent agreements and imposed by School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health Research Ethics Sub-Committee at Durham University, the data underlying this study may not be published. Inquires related to these restrictions may be submitted to the Chair of the Faculty of Social Sciences and Health Research Ethics Committee at Durham University, Professor Sarah Atkinson ( s.j.atkinson@ 123456durham.ac.uk ).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article