1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Evolution, biomechanics, and neurobiology converge to explain selective finger motor control

      1 , 2 , 3
      Physiological Reviews
      American Physiological Society

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Humans use their fingers to perform a variety of tasks, from simple grasping to manipulating objects, to typing and playing musical instruments, a variety wider than any other species. The more sophisticated the task, the more it involves individuated finger movements, those in which one or more selected fingers perform an intended action while the motion of other digits is constrained. Here we review the neurobiology of such individuated finger movements. We consider their evolutionary origins, the extent to which finger movements are in fact individuated, and the evolved features of neuromuscular control that both enable and limit individuation. We go on to discuss other features of motor control that combine with individuation to create dexterity, the impairment of individuation by disease, and the broad extent of capabilities that individuation confers on humans. We comment on the challenges facing the development of a truly dexterous bionic hand. We conclude by identifying topics for future investigation that will advance our understanding of how neural networks interact across multiple regions of the central nervous system to create individuated movements for the skills humans use to express their cognitive activity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references293

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Decoding the organization of spinal circuits that control locomotion.

          Ole Kiehn (2016)
          Unravelling the functional operation of neuronal networks and linking cellular activity to specific behavioural outcomes are among the biggest challenges in neuroscience. In this broad field of research, substantial progress has been made in studies of the spinal networks that control locomotion. Through united efforts using electrophysiological and molecular genetic network approaches and behavioural studies in phylogenetically diverse experimental models, the organization of locomotor networks has begun to be decoded. The emergent themes from this research are that the locomotor networks have a modular organization with distinct transmitter and molecular codes and that their organization is reconfigured with changes to the speed of locomotion or changes in gait.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Restoration of reaching and grasping in a person with tetraplegia through brain-controlled muscle stimulation: a proof-of-concept demonstration

            SUMMARY Background People with chronic tetraplegia due to high cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) can regain limb movements through coordinated electrical stimulation of peripheral muscles and nerves, known as Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES). Users typically command FES systems through other preserved, but limited and unrelated, volitional movements (e.g. facial muscle activity, head movements). We demonstrate an individual with traumatic high cervical SCI performing coordinated reaching and grasping movements using his own paralyzed arm and hand, reanimated through FES, and commanded using his own cortical signals through an intracortical brain-computer-interface (iBCI). Methods The study participant (53 years old, C4, ASIA A) received two intracortical microelectrode arrays in the hand area of motor cortex, and 36 percutaneous electrodes for electrically stimulating hand, elbow, and shoulder muscles. The participant used a motorized mobile arm support for gravitational assistance and to provide humeral ab/adduction under cortical control. We assessed the participant’s ability to cortically command his paralyzed arm to perform simple single-joint arm/hand movements and functionally meaningful multi-joint movements. We compared iBCI control of his paralyzed arm to that of a virtual 3D arm. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00912041. Findings The participant successfully cortically commanded single-joint and coordinated multi-joint arm movements for point-to-point target acquisitions (80% – 100% accuracy) using first a virtual arm, and second his own arm animated by FES. Using his paralyzed arm, the participant volitionally performed self-paced reaches to drink a mug of coffee (successfully completing 11 of 12 attempts within a single session) and feed himself. Interpretation This is the first demonstration of a combined FES+iBCI neuroprosthesis for both reaching and grasping for people with SCI resulting in chronic tetraplegia, and represents a major advance, with a clear translational path, for clinically viable neuroprostheses for restoring reaching and grasping post-paralysis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Descending pathways in motor control.

              Each of the descending pathways involved in motor control has a number of anatomical, molecular, pharmacological, and neuroinformatic characteristics. They are differentially involved in motor control, a process that results from operations involving the entire motor network rather than from the brain commanding the spinal cord. A given pathway can have many functional roles. This review explores to what extent descending pathways are highly conserved across species and concludes that there are actually rather widespread species differences, for example, in the transmission of information from the corticospinal tract to upper limb motoneurons. The significance of direct, cortico-motoneuronal (CM) connections, which were discovered a little more than 50 years ago, is reassessed. I conclude that although these connections operate in parallel with other less direct linkages to motoneurons, CM influence is significant and may subserve some special functions including adaptive motor behaviors involving the distal extremities.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Physiological Reviews
                Physiological Reviews
                American Physiological Society
                0031-9333
                1522-1210
                July 01 2024
                July 01 2024
                : 104
                : 3
                : 983-1020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States
                [2 ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
                [3 ]Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States
                Article
                10.1152/physrev.00030.2023
                38385888
                72c6ed84-b656-4237-aac7-93ad487ff190
                © 2024
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article