9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Situating space: using a discipline-focused lens to examine spatial thinking skills

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Spatial skills are an important component of success in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields. A majority of what we know about spatial skills today is a result of more than 100 years of research focused on understanding and identifying the kinds of skills that make up this skill set. Over the last two decades, the field has recognized that, unlike the spatial skills measured by psychometric tests developed by psychology researchers, the spatial problems faced by STEM experts vary widely and are multifaceted. Thus, many psychological researchers have embraced an interdisciplinary approach to studying spatial thinking with the aim of understanding the nature of this skill set as it occurs within STEM disciplines. In a parallel effort, discipline-based education researchers specializing in STEM domains have focused much of their research on understanding how to bolster students’ skills in completing domain-specific spatial tasks. In this paper, we discuss four lessons learned from these two programs of research to enhance the field’s understanding of spatial thinking in STEM domains. We demonstrate each contribution by aligning findings from research on three distinct STEM disciplines: structural geology, surgery, and organic chemistry. Lastly, we discuss the potential implications of these contributions to STEM education.

          Related collections

          Most cited references104

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization.

          A new paper-and-pencil test of spatial visualization was constructed from the figures used in the chronometric study of Shepard and Metzler (1971). In large samples, the new test displayed substantial internal consistency (Kuder-Richardson 20 = .88), a test-retest reliability (.83), and consistent sex differences over the entire range of ages investigated. Correlations with other measures indicated strong association with tests of spatial visualization and virtually no association with tests of verbal ability.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

              Numerous recent studies seem to provide evidence for the general intellectual benefits of working memory training. In reviews of the training literature, Shipstead, Redick, and Engle (2010, 2012) argued that the field should treat recent results with a critical eye. Many published working memory training studies suffer from design limitations (no-contact control groups, single measures of cognitive constructs), mixed results (transfer of training gains to some tasks but not others, inconsistent transfer to the same tasks across studies), and lack of theoretical grounding (identifying the mechanisms responsible for observed transfer). The current study compared young adults who received 20 sessions of practice on an adaptive dual n-back program (working memory training group) or an adaptive visual search program (active placebo-control group) with a no-contact control group that received no practice. In addition, all subjects completed pretest, midtest, and posttest sessions comprising multiple measures of fluid intelligence, multitasking, working memory capacity, crystallized intelligence, and perceptual speed. Despite improvements on both the dual n-back and visual search tasks with practice, and despite a high level of statistical power, there was no positive transfer to any of the cognitive ability tests. We discuss these results in the context of previous working memory training research and address issues for future working memory training studies. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kinnari.atit@ucr.edu
                Journal
                Cogn Res Princ Implic
                Cogn Res Princ Implic
                Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2365-7464
                22 April 2020
                22 April 2020
                December 2020
                : 5
                : 19
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.266097.c, ISNI 0000 0001 2222 1582, Graduate School of Education, , University of California, ; Riverside, 1207 Sproul Hall, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.16753.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2299 3507, School of Education and Social Policy, , Northwestern University, ; Evanston, IL USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.185648.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2175 0319, Learning Sciences Research Institute, , University of Illinois at Chicago, ; Chicago, IL USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3287-6336
                Article
                210
                10.1186/s41235-020-00210-z
                7176750
                32323024
                72beb801-ab61-4a9f-bcc3-efad7deb49c7
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 22 August 2019
                : 11 February 2020
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                spatial skills,stem education,expertise,interdisciplinary research,discipline-based education research

                Comments

                Comment on this article