6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Collateral impacts of pandemic COVID-19 drive the nosocomial spread of antibiotic resistance: A modelling study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Circulation of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MRB) in healthcare facilities is a major public health problem. These settings have been greatly impacted by the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, notably due to surges in COVID-19 caseloads and the implementation of infection control measures. We sought to evaluate how such collateral impacts of COVID-19 impacted the nosocomial spread of MRB in an early pandemic context.

          Methods and findings

          We developed a mathematical model in which Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and MRB cocirculate among patients and staff in a theoretical hospital population. Responses to COVID-19 were captured mechanistically via a range of parameters that reflect impacts of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on factors relevant for pathogen transmission. COVID-19 responses include both “policy responses” willingly enacted to limit SARS-CoV-2 transmission (e.g., universal masking, patient lockdown, and reinforced hand hygiene) and “caseload responses” unwillingly resulting from surges in COVID-19 caseloads (e.g., abandonment of antibiotic stewardship, disorganization of infection control programmes, and extended length of stay for COVID-19 patients). We conducted 2 main sets of model simulations, in which we quantified impacts of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on MRB colonization incidence and antibiotic resistance rates (the share of colonization due to antibiotic-resistant versus antibiotic-sensitive strains).

          The first set of simulations represents diverse MRB and nosocomial environments, accounting for high levels of heterogeneity across bacterial parameters (e.g., rates of transmission, antibiotic sensitivity, and colonization prevalence among newly admitted patients) and hospital parameters (e.g., rates of interindividual contact, antibiotic exposure, and patient admission/discharge). On average, COVID-19 control policies coincided with MRB prevention, including 28.2% [95% uncertainty interval: 2.5%, 60.2%] fewer incident cases of patient MRB colonization. Conversely, surges in COVID-19 caseloads favoured MRB transmission, resulting in a 13.8% [−3.5%, 77.0%] increase in colonization incidence and a 10.4% [0.2%, 46.9%] increase in antibiotic resistance rates in the absence of concomitant COVID-19 control policies. When COVID-19 policy responses and caseload responses were combined, MRB colonization incidence decreased by 24.2% [−7.8%, 59.3%], while resistance rates increased by 2.9% [−5.4%, 23.2%]. Impacts of COVID-19 responses varied across patients and staff and their respective routes of pathogen acquisition.

          The second set of simulations was tailored to specific hospital wards and nosocomial bacteria (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli). Consequences of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks were found to be highly context specific, with impacts depending on the specific ward and bacteria evaluated. In particular, SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks significantly impacted patient MRB colonization only in settings with high underlying risk of bacterial transmission. Yet across settings and species, antibiotic resistance burden was reduced in facilities with timelier implementation of effective COVID-19 control policies.

          Conclusions

          Our model suggests that surges in nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission generate selection for the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Timely implementation of efficient COVID-19 control measures thus has 2-fold benefits, preventing the transmission of both SARS-CoV-2 and MRB, and highlighting antibiotic resistance control as a collateral benefit of pandemic preparedness.

          Abstract

          In this modelling study, David Smith and colleagues, demonstrate the potential of COVID-19 to impact the in-hospital epidemiology of antibiotic resistance.

          Author summary

          Why was this study done?
          • Antibiotic resistance is a major global health problem, and healthcare settings are hotspots for the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

          • Healthcare settings have been heavily impacted by the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, in particular due to sudden surges of COVID-19 cases, the ensuing disorganization of care delivery, and the enactment of infection control measures designed to curb viral transmission.

          • The COVID-19 pandemic has led to shifts in the epidemiological dynamics of diverse infectious diseases, but its impacts on the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria remain poorly understood, due in part to the largely unobserved nature of bacterial colonization.

          What did the researchers do and find?
          • A mathematical model was developed and used to assess how outbreaks of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in healthcare settings may impact patient colonization with antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

          • Surges in COVID-19 cases fostered conditions favourable for bacterial transmission, on average resulting in a 14% increase in colonization acquisition and a 10% increase in rates of antibiotic resistance.

          • Conversely, the implementation of COVID-19 control measures provided the unintended benefit of limiting bacterial spread, leading to a 28% reduction in patient acquisition of drug-resistant bacteria.

          • Impacts of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on antibiotic resistance were found to depend fundamentally on the particular characteristics of different hospital wards and bacterial species, but more timely implementation of effective COVID-19 control policies helped to limit the spread of antibiotic resistance across a wide range of contexts.

          What do these findings mean?
          • Outbreaks of respiratory pathogens like SARS-CoV-2 risk aggravating the concomitant spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

          • Healthcare facilities with greater underlying risk of bacterial transmission are likely more vulnerable to surges in antibiotic resistance in the event of a pandemic.

          • Limiting the spread of antibiotic resistance should be considered as a collateral benefit of pandemic preparedness initiatives that enable more efficient public health responses to counter emerging infectious threats.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis

          (2022)
          Summary Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a major threat to human health around the world. Previous publications have estimated the effect of AMR on incidence, deaths, hospital length of stay, and health-care costs for specific pathogen–drug combinations in select locations. To our knowledge, this study presents the most comprehensive estimates of AMR burden to date. Methods We estimated deaths and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) attributable to and associated with bacterial AMR for 23 pathogens and 88 pathogen–drug combinations in 204 countries and territories in 2019. We obtained data from systematic literature reviews, hospital systems, surveillance systems, and other sources, covering 471 million individual records or isolates and 7585 study-location-years. We used predictive statistical modelling to produce estimates of AMR burden for all locations, including for locations with no data. Our approach can be divided into five broad components: number of deaths where infection played a role, proportion of infectious deaths attributable to a given infectious syndrome, proportion of infectious syndrome deaths attributable to a given pathogen, the percentage of a given pathogen resistant to an antibiotic of interest, and the excess risk of death or duration of an infection associated with this resistance. Using these components, we estimated disease burden based on two counterfactuals: deaths attributable to AMR (based on an alternative scenario in which all drug-resistant infections were replaced by drug-susceptible infections), and deaths associated with AMR (based on an alternative scenario in which all drug-resistant infections were replaced by no infection). We generated 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) for final estimates as the 25th and 975th ordered values across 1000 posterior draws, and models were cross-validated for out-of-sample predictive validity. We present final estimates aggregated to the global and regional level. Findings On the basis of our predictive statistical models, there were an estimated 4·95 million (3·62–6·57) deaths associated with bacterial AMR in 2019, including 1·27 million (95% UI 0·911–1·71) deaths attributable to bacterial AMR. At the regional level, we estimated the all-age death rate attributable to resistance to be highest in western sub-Saharan Africa, at 27·3 deaths per 100 000 (20·9–35·3), and lowest in Australasia, at 6·5 deaths (4·3–9·4) per 100 000. Lower respiratory infections accounted for more than 1·5 million deaths associated with resistance in 2019, making it the most burdensome infectious syndrome. The six leading pathogens for deaths associated with resistance (Escherichia coli, followed by Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were responsible for 929 000 (660 000–1 270 000) deaths attributable to AMR and 3·57 million (2·62–4·78) deaths associated with AMR in 2019. One pathogen–drug combination, meticillin-resistant S aureus, caused more than 100 000 deaths attributable to AMR in 2019, while six more each caused 50 000–100 000 deaths: multidrug-resistant excluding extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E coli, carbapenem-resistant A baumannii, fluoroquinolone-resistant E coli, carbapenem-resistant K pneumoniae, and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant K pneumoniae. Interpretation To our knowledge, this study provides the first comprehensive assessment of the global burden of AMR, as well as an evaluation of the availability of data. AMR is a leading cause of death around the world, with the highest burdens in low-resource settings. Understanding the burden of AMR and the leading pathogen–drug combinations contributing to it is crucial to making informed and location-specific policy decisions, particularly about infection prevention and control programmes, access to essential antibiotics, and research and development of new vaccines and antibiotics. There are serious data gaps in many low-income settings, emphasising the need to expand microbiology laboratory capacity and data collection systems to improve our understanding of this important human health threat. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and Department of Health and Social Care using UK aid funding managed by the Fleming Fund.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Antibiotic prescribing in patients with COVID-19: rapid review and meta-analysis

            Objective The proportion of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 that are prescribed antibiotics is uncertain, and may contribute to patient harm and global antibiotic resistance. Our objective was to estimate the prevalence and associated factors of antibiotic use in patients with confirmed COVID-19. Methods We searched MEDLINE, OVID Epub and EMBASE for published literature on human subjects in English up to June 9, 2020. Inclusion criteria were any healthcare settings and age groups; randomized controlled trials; cohort studies; case series with >10 patients; experimental or observational design that evaluated antibiotic prescribing. The main outcome of interest was proportion of COVID-19 patients prescribed an antibiotic, stratified by geographical region, severity of illness, and age. We pooled proportion data using random effects meta-analysis. Results We screened 7469 studies, from which 154 were included in the final analysis. Antibiotic data were available from 30,623 patients. The prevalence of antibiotic prescribing was 74.6% (95% CI 68.3 to 80.0%). On univariable meta-regression, antibiotic prescribing was lower in children (prescribing prevalence odds ratio (OR) 0.10, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.33) compared to adults. Antibiotic prescribing was higher with increasing patient age (OR 1.45 per 10 year increase, 95%CI 1.18 to 1.77) and higher with increasing proportion of patients requiring mechanical ventilation (OR 1.33 per 10% increase, 95%CI 1.15 to 1.54). Estimated bacterial co-infection was 8.6% (95% CI 4.7-15.2%) from 31 studies. Conclusions Three-quarters of patients with COVID-19 receive antibiotics, prescribing is significantly higher than the estimated prevalence of bacterial co-infection. Unnecessary antibiotic use is likely high in patients with COVID-19. Registration PROSPERO (ID CRD42020192286).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Solving Differential Equations inR: PackagedeSolve

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: SoftwareRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Journal
                PLoS Med
                PLoS Med
                plos
                PLOS Medicine
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1549-1277
                1549-1676
                5 June 2023
                June 2023
                : 20
                : 6
                : e1004240
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Epidemiology and Modelling of Antibiotic Evasion (EMAE), Paris, France
                [2 ] Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Anti-infective evasion and pharmacoepidemiology team, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
                [3 ] Modélisation, épidémiologie et surveillance des risques sanitaires (MESuRS), Conservatoire national des arts et métiers, Paris, France
                [4 ] Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [5 ] PACRI unit, Institut Pasteur, Conservatoire national des arts et métiers, Paris, France
                Author notes

                I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: L.O. reports grants from Pfizer outside the submitted work. Authors declare no other competing interests

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7330-4262
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4654-1254
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8850-5403
                Article
                PMEDICINE-D-22-03098
                10.1371/journal.pmed.1004240
                10241372
                37276186
                72b63863-9270-4e2c-af67-ca1cf6ba0a09
                © 2023 Smith et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 16 September 2022
                : 9 May 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Pages: 22
                Funding
                Funded by: Fondation de France
                Award ID: 106059
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007241, Université Paris-Saclay;
                Award ID: AAP Covid-19 2020
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001665, Agence Nationale de la Recherche;
                Award ID: ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001665, Agence Nationale de la Recherche;
                Award ID: SPHINX-17-CE36-0008-01
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001665, Agence Nationale de la Recherche;
                Award ID: SPHINX-17-CE36-0008-01
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000024, Canadian Institutes of Health Research;
                Award ID: DFSA 164263
                Award Recipient :
                The Epidemiology & Modelling of Antibiotic Evasion team and the Anti-infective Evasion and Pharmacoepidemiology team received funding from the MODCOV project from the Fondation de France as part of the alliance framework “Tous unis contre le virus” (#106059), the Université Paris-Saclay (AAP Covid-19 2020) and the French National Research Agency and the “Investissement d’Avenir” program, Laboratoire d’Excellence “Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases” (ANR-10-LABX-62- IBEID). Researchers were also supported by research grants from the French National Research Agency (SPHINX-17-CE36-0008-01 to L.T and L.O) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Doctoral Foreign Study Award #164263 to D.R.M.S.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Infectious Diseases
                Viral Diseases
                Covid 19
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Microbiology
                Microbial Control
                Antimicrobial Resistance
                Antibiotic Resistance
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmacology
                Antimicrobial Resistance
                Antibiotic Resistance
                Biology and life sciences
                Organisms
                Viruses
                RNA viruses
                Coronaviruses
                SARS coronavirus
                SARS CoV 2
                Biology and life sciences
                Microbiology
                Medical microbiology
                Microbial pathogens
                Viral pathogens
                Coronaviruses
                SARS coronavirus
                SARS CoV 2
                Medicine and health sciences
                Pathology and laboratory medicine
                Pathogens
                Microbial pathogens
                Viral pathogens
                Coronaviruses
                SARS coronavirus
                SARS CoV 2
                Biology and life sciences
                Organisms
                Viruses
                Viral pathogens
                Coronaviruses
                SARS coronavirus
                SARS CoV 2
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Infectious Diseases
                Nosocomial Infections
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Pandemics
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Infectious Diseases
                Respiratory Infections
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Respiratory Disorders
                Respiratory Infections
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pulmonology
                Respiratory Disorders
                Respiratory Infections
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Facilities
                Custom metadata
                All data used in and produced by this study are available at https://github.com/drmsmith/covR/.
                COVID-19

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article