Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Amyloid Biomarker Discordance in Patients Evaluated for Anti‐Amyloid Therapy

      abstract

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Evidence for abnormal amyloid‐β (Aβ) plaque accumulation is necessary prior to initiating anti‐amyloid therapy in early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease (AD). While the clinical trials for lecanemab and related drugs utilized positron emission tomography (PET) to demonstrate brain amyloidosis, current appropriate use recommendations for clinical practice consider PET or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers as satisfactory for this purpose. Here, we present four clinical cases where CSF biomarker results were discordant from amyloid PET, with the potential to result in erroneous treatment targeting.

          Method

          Patients were seen at a tertiary care subspecialty clinic in consideration for lecanemab therapy. All patients had office examination, neuropsychological assessment, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), amyloid PET (with either 11C‐Pittsburgh compound B or 18F‐florbetapir), CSF AD biomarkers (Roche Elecsys p‐tau181/Aβ42 and Fujirebio Lumipulse Aβ42/Aβ40 ratios), and apolipoprotein E ( APOE) allele testing. Amyloid PET interpretations were made by consensus visual review from experienced readers.

          Result

          All four patients had clinical diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia (Table 1). Two patients had positive CSF p‐tau181/Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 ratios with negative amyloid PET (indicating sparse to no neuritic plaques). Case 1 displayed aphasia (characterized by anomia and deep dysgraphia) and imaging findings possibly compatible with semantic dementia. Case 2 displayed a gait abnormality and imaging signs of abnormal CSF dynamics. Two other patients had negative CSF p‐tau181/Aβ42 measures with positive amyloid PET (indicating moderate to frequent neuritic plaques). In those instances, the clinical syndrome and imaging studies were strongly supportive of AD and the CSF Aβ42/40 ratio was “likely positive” (Table 1). For one patient (Case 4), tau PET and Lumipulse plasma p‐tau217 concentration were both positive.

          Conclusion

          Clinicians prescribing anti‐amyloid therapies should be aware of the possibility for CSF biomarkers to be discordant from amyloid PET status in select scenarios. These cases highlight the value of considering PET imaging in the presence of clinically atypical features, concern for mixed etiology, or strong clinical suspicion for AD despite negative CSF biomarkers. Larger series are needed to identify broader patterns contributing to biomarker discordance by assay, modality (PET versus CSF/plasma measures), and medical/neurologic comorbidities.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Ramanan.Vijay@mayo.edu
          Journal
          Alzheimers Dement
          Alzheimers Dement
          10.1002/(ISSN)1552-5279
          ALZ
          Alzheimer's & Dementia
          John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
          1552-5260
          1552-5279
          09 January 2025
          December 2024
          : 20
          : Suppl 8 ( doiID: 10.1002/alz.v20.S8 )
          : e095777
          Affiliations
          [ 1 ] Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
          [ 2 ] Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
          [ 3 ] Mayo Clinic, Radiology, Rochester, MN USA
          [ 4 ] Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
          Author notes
          [*] [* ] Correspondence

          Vijay K. Ramanan, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

          Email: Ramanan.Vijay@ 123456mayo.edu

          Article
          ALZ095777
          10.1002/alz.095777
          11713296
          71aaaa0f-57ff-48e2-bb55-0c74007ba835
          © 2024 The Alzheimer's Association. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.

          This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

          History
          Page count
          Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Pages: 2, Words: 518
          Categories
          Biomarkers
          Biomarkers
          Poster Presentation
          Biomarkers (Non‐neuroimaging)
          Custom metadata
          2.0
          December 2024
          Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.5.2 mode:remove_FC converted:09.01.2025

          Comments

          Comment on this article