6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Larvivorous fish for preventing malaria transmission

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Adult anopheline mosquitoes transmit Plasmodium parasites that cause malaria. Some fish species eat mosquito larvae and pupae. In disease control policy documents, the World Health Organization includes biological control of malaria vectors by stocking ponds, rivers, and water collections near where people live with larvivorous fish to reduce Plasmodium parasite transmission. The Global Fund finances larvivorous fish programmes in some countries, and, with increasing efforts in eradication of malaria, policy makers may return to this option. We therefore assessed the evidence base for larvivorous fish programmes in malaria control.

          Objectives

          Our main objective was to evaluate whether introducing larvivorous fish to anopheline breeding sites impacts Plasmodium parasite transmission. Our secondary objective was to summarize studies evaluating whether introducing larvivorous fish influences the density and presence of Anopheles larvae and pupae in water sources, to understand whether fish can possibly have an effect.

          Search methods

          We attempted to identify all relevant studies regardless of language or publication status (published, unpublished, in press, or ongoing). We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), published in The Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; EMBASE; CABS Abstracts; LILACS; and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials ( mRCT) until 18 June 2013. We checked the reference lists of all studies identified by the above methods. We also examined references listed in review articles and previously compiled bibliographies to look for eligible studies.

          Selection criteria

          Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials, including controlled before-and-after studies, controlled time series and controlled interrupted time series studies from malaria-endemic regions that introduced fish as a larvicide and reported on malaria in the community or the density of the adult anopheline population. In the absence of direct evidence of an effect on transmission, we carried out a secondary analysis on studies that evaluated the effect of introducing larvivorous fish on the density or presence of immature anopheline mosquitoes (larvae and pupae forms) in community water sources to determine whether this intervention has any potential in further research on control of malaria vectors.

          Data collection and analysis

          Three review authors screened abstracts and examined potentially relevant studies by using an eligibility form. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. If relevant data were unclear or were not reported, we wrote to the trial authors for clarification. We presented data in tables, and we summarized studies that evaluated the effects of fish introduction on anopheline immature density or presence, or both. We used GRADE to summarize evidence quality. We also examined whether the authors of included studies reported on any possible adverse impact of larvivorous fish introduction on non-target native species.

          Main results

          We found no reliable studies that reported the effects of introducing larvivorous fish on malaria infection in nearby communities, on entomological inoculation rate, or on adult Anopheles density.

          For the secondary analysis, we examined the effects of introducing larvivorous fish on the density and presence of anopheline larvae and pupae in community water sources. We included 12 small studies, with follow-up from 22 days to five years. Studies were conducted in a variety of settings, including localized water bodies (such as wells, domestic water containers, fishponds, and pools; six studies), riverbed pools below dams (two studies), rice field plots (three studies), and water canals (two studies). All studies were at high risk of bias.

          The research was insufficient to determine whether larvivorous fish reduce the density of Anopheles larvae and pupae (nine studies, unpooled data, very low quality evidence). Some studies with high stocking levels of fish seemed to arrest the increase in immature anopheline populations, or to reduce the number of immature anopheline mosquitoes, compared with controls. However, this finding was not consistent, and in studies that showed a decrease in immature anopheline populations, the effect was not consistently sustained. Larvivorous fish may reduce the number of water sources with Anopheles larvae and pupae (five studies, unpooled data, low quality evidence).

          None of the included studies reported effects of larvivorous fish on local native fish populations or other species.

          Authors' conclusions

          Reliable research is insufficient to show whether introducing larvivorous fish reduces malaria transmission or the density of adult anopheline mosquito populations.

          In research examining the effects on immature anopheline stages of introducing fish to potential malaria vector breeding sites (localized water bodies such as wells and domestic water sources, rice field plots, and water canals) weak evidence suggests an effect on the density or presence of immature anopheline mosquitoes with high stocking levels of fish, but this finding is by no means consistent. We do not know whether this translates into health benefits, either with fish alone or with fish combined with other vector control measures. Our interpretation of the current evidence is that countries should not invest in fish stocking as a larval control measure in any malaria transmission areas outside the context of carefully controlled field studies or quasi-experimental designs. Research could also usefully examine the effects on native fish and other non-target species.

          PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY
          Fish that feed on mosquito larvae for preventing malaria transmission

          Plasmodium parasites cause malaria and are transmitted by adult Anopheles mosquitoes. Programmes that introduce fish into water sources near where people live have been promoted. The theory is that these fish eat the Anopheles mosquito larvae and pupae, thus decreasing the adult mosquito population and reducing the number of people infected with Plasmodium parasites.

          In this review, we examined the research that evaluated introducing larvivorous fish to Anopheles mosquito breeding sites in areas where malaria was common, published up to 18 June 2013. We did not find any studies that looked at the effects of larvivorous fish on adult Anopheles mosquito populations or on the number of people infected with Plasmodium parasites. We included 12 studies that examined the effects of larvivorous fish on Anopheles larvae and pupae in different breeding sites, including localized water bodies (such as wells, domestic water containers, fishponds, and pools; six studies), riverbed pools below dams (two studies), rice field plots (three studies), and water canals (two studies). Research evidence is insufficient to show whether introduction of larvivorous fish reduces the number of Anopheles larvae and pupae in water sources (nine studies, unpooled data, very low quality evidence). However, larvivorous fish may reduce the number of water sources with Anopheles mosquito larvae and pupae (five studies, unpooled data, low quality evidence). None of the included studies examined the effects of introducing larvivorous fish on other native species present, but these studies were not designed to do this. Before much is invested in this intervention, better research is needed to determine the effect of introducing larvivorous fish on adult Anopheles populations and on the number of people infected with malaria. Researchers need to use robust controlled designs with an adequate number of sites. Also, researchers should explore whether introducing these fish affects native fish and other non-target species.

          Related collections

          Most cited references137

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Contributions of Anopheles larval control to malaria suppression in tropical Africa: review of achievements and potential.

          Malaria vector control targeting the larval stages of mosquitoes was applied successfully against many species of Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) in malarious countries until the mid-20th Century. Since the introduction of DDT in the 1940s and the associated development of indoor residual spraying (IRS), which usually has a more powerful impact than larval control on vectorial capacity, the focus of malaria prevention programmes has shifted to the control of adult vectors. In the Afrotropical Region, where malaria is transmitted mainly by Anopheles funestus Giles and members of the Anopheles gambiae Giles complex, gaps in information on larval ecology and the ability of An. gambiae sensu lato to exploit a wide variety of larval habitats have discouraged efforts to develop and implement larval control strategies. Opportunities to complement adulticiding with other components of integrated vector management, along with concerns about insecticide resistance, environmental impacts, rising costs of IRS and logistical constraints, have stimulated renewed interest in larval control of malaria vectors. Techniques include environmental management, involving the temporary or permanent removal of anopheline larval habitats, as well as larviciding with chemical or biological agents. This present review covers large-scale trials of anopheline larval control methods, focusing on field studies in Africa conducted within the past 15 years. Although such studies are limited in number and scope, their results suggest that targeting larvae, particularly in human-made habitats, can significantly reduce malaria transmission in appropriate settings. These approaches are especially suitable for urban areas, where larval habitats are limited, particularly when applied in conjunction with IRS and other adulticidal measures, such as the use of insecticide treated bednets.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Malaria eradication on islands.

            To be successful, a malaria control programme needs to be tailored to the local epidemiological characteristics. Vanuatu consists of 80 inhabited islands in the Southwest Pacific, with hypoendemic and mesoendemic malaria and suitable conditions for sustained parasite elimination. We aimed to assess whether malaria can be eliminated on isolated islands. Weekly mass drug administration of chloroquine, pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine (Fansidar), and primaquine was carried out on the entire population of 718 inhabitants of Aneityum island for 9 weeks in 1991 before the onset of the rainy season. Simultaneously with the administration of drugs, permethrin-impregnated bednets were distributed to the entire population. Larvivorous fish were also introduced into several identified breeding sites of Anopheles farauti. Periodic malariometric monitoring has continued for the past 9 years. Two additional islands of Vanuatu, one with and one without malaria transmission, have been monitored for comparison. High community involvement as measured by drug compliance (88.3%) and bednet provision (0.94 nets per villager) has resulted in sustained interruption of malaria transmission in Aneityum. The surveys showed complete absence of Plasmodium falciparum after mass drug administration, and P. vivax disappeared from 1996 onwards, with the exception of two instances of imported infections (one mixed infection in 1993 and one P. vivax infection in 1999). Malaria can be eliminated on isolated islands with well-adapted short-term mass drug administration and sustained vector control if there is a high degree of community participation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Plague Minnow or Mosquito Fish? A Review of the Biology and Impacts of IntroducedGambusiaSpecies

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cochrane Database Syst Rev
                Cochrane Database Syst Rev
                cd
                The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
                John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (Chichester, UK )
                1469-493X
                10 December 2013
                : 12
                : 1-65
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine Liverpool, UK
                [2 ]College of Medicine, King Saud University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [3 ]School of the Environment, University of Technology Sydney Broadway, Australia
                [4 ]Department of Biology, Macquarie University Ryde, Australia
                [5 ]School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences, James Cook University Cairns, Australia
                Author notes
                Contact address: Tom Burkot, School of Public Health, TropicalMedicine and Rehabilitation Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, 4870, Australia. tom.burkot@ 123456jcu.edu.au . tomburkot@ 123456gmail.com .

                Editorial group: Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group.

                Publication status and date: New, published in Issue 12, 2013.

                Review content assessed as up-to-date: 18 June 2013.

                Article
                10.1002/14651858.CD008090.pub2
                4468924
                24323308
                715180ba-577c-401d-a3da-48d5c4cbfecd
                Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                History
                Categories
                Review

                Comments

                Comment on this article