31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      First computational design using lambda-superstrings and in vivo validation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the greatest threat to global health at the present time, and considerable public and private effort is being devoted to fighting this recently emerged disease. Despite the undoubted advances in the development of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19, uncertainty remains about their future efficacy and the duration of the immunity induced. It is therefore prudent to continue designing and testing vaccines against this pathogen. In this article we computationally designed two candidate vaccines, one monopeptide and one multipeptide, using a technique involving optimizing lambda-superstrings, which was introduced and developed by our research group. We tested the monopeptide vaccine, thus establishing a proof of concept for the validity of the technique. We synthesized a peptide of 22 amino acids in length, corresponding to one of the candidate vaccines, and prepared a dendritic cell (DC) vaccine vector loaded with the 22 amino acids SARS-CoV-2 peptide (positions 50-71) contained in the NTD domain (DC-CoVPSA) of the Spike protein. Next, we tested the immunogenicity, the type of immune response elicited, and the cytokine profile induced by the vaccine, using a non-related bacterial peptide as negative control. Our results indicated that the CoVPSA peptide of the Spike protein elicits noticeable immunogenicity in vivo using a DC vaccine vector and remarkable cellular and humoral immune responses. This DC vaccine vector loaded with the NTD peptide of the Spike protein elicited a predominant Th1-Th17 cytokine profile, indicative of an effective anti-viral response. Finally, we performed a proof of concept experiment in humans that included the following groups: asymptomatic non-active COVID-19 patients, vaccinated volunteers, and control donors that tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. The positive control was the current receptor binding domain epitope of COVID-19 RNA-vaccines. We successfully developed a vaccine candidate technique involving optimizing lambda-superstrings and provided proof of concept in human subjects. We conclude that it is a valid method to decipher the best epitopes of the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 to prepare peptide-based vaccines for different vector platforms, including DC vaccines.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation

          Structure of the nCoV trimeric spike The World Health Organization has declared the outbreak of a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) to be a public health emergency of international concern. The virus binds to host cells through its trimeric spike glycoprotein, making this protein a key target for potential therapies and diagnostics. Wrapp et al. determined a 3.5-angstrom-resolution structure of the 2019-nCoV trimeric spike protein by cryo–electron microscopy. Using biophysical assays, the authors show that this protein binds at least 10 times more tightly than the corresponding spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)–CoV to their common host cell receptor. They also tested three antibodies known to bind to the SARS-CoV spike protein but did not detect binding to the 2019-nCoV spike protein. These studies provide valuable information to guide the development of medical counter-measures for 2019-nCoV. Science, this issue p. 1260
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development

            Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first reported in late 2019 in China and is the causative agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. To mitigate the effects of the virus on public health, the economy and society, a vaccine is urgently needed. Here I review the development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Development was initiated when the genetic sequence of the virus became available in early January 2020, and has moved at an unprecedented speed: a phase I trial started in March 2020 and there are currently more than 180 vaccines at various stages of development. Data from phase I and phase II trials are already available for several vaccine candidates, and many have moved into phase III trials. The data available so far suggest that effective and safe vaccines might become available within months, rather than years.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Potent neutralizing antibodies directed to multiple epitopes on SARS-CoV-2 spike

              The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic continues, with devasting consequences for human lives and the global economy1,2. The discovery and development of virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies could be one approach to treat or prevent infection by this coronavirus. Here we report the isolation of sixty-one SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies from five patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and admitted to hospital with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Among these are nineteen antibodies that potently neutralized authentic SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, nine of which exhibited very high potency, with 50% virus-inhibitory concentrations of 0.7 to 9 ng ml-1. Epitope mapping showed that this collection of nineteen antibodies was about equally divided between those directed against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and those directed against the N-terminal domain (NTD), indicating that both of these regions at the top of the viral spike are immunogenic. In addition, two other powerful neutralizing antibodies recognized quaternary epitopes that overlap with the domains at the top of the spike. Cryo-electron microscopy reconstructions of one antibody that targets the RBD, a second that targets the NTD, and a third that bridges two separate RBDs showed that the antibodies recognize the closed, 'all RBD-down' conformation of the spike. Several of these monoclonal antibodies are promising candidates for clinical development as potential therapeutic and/or prophylactic agents against SARS-CoV-2.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                luis.martinez@ehu.eus
                carmen.alvarezd@scsalud.es
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                19 April 2022
                19 April 2022
                2022
                : 12
                : 6410
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.11480.3c, ISNI 0000000121671098, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, , University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, ; 48940 Leioa, Spain
                [2 ]GRID grid.462072.5, ISNI 0000 0004 0467 2410, BCAM, Basque Center for Applied Mathematics, ; 48009 Bilbao, Spain
                [3 ]GRID grid.411232.7, ISNI 0000 0004 1767 5135, BioCruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, ; 48903 Barakaldo, Spain
                [4 ]GRID grid.484299.a, ISNI 0000 0004 9288 8771, Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), ; 39011 Santander, Spain
                [5 ]GRID grid.11480.3c, ISNI 0000000121671098, Department of Genetics, Physical Anthropology and Animal Physiology, Faculty of Science and Technology, , University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, ; 48940 Leioa, Spain
                [6 ]GRID grid.11480.3c, ISNI 0000000121671098, María Goyri Building. Animal Biotechnology Center, , University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, ; 48940 Leioa, Spain
                [7 ]GRID grid.411325.0, ISNI 0000 0001 0627 4262, Servicio de Inmunología, , Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, ; 39008 Santander, Spain
                [8 ]GRID grid.411325.0, ISNI 0000 0001 0627 4262, Servicio de Microbiología, , Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, ; 39008 Santander, Spain
                [9 ]GRID grid.13825.3d, ISNI 0000 0004 0458 0356, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, ; 26006 Logroño, Spain
                [10 ]GRID grid.413448.e, ISNI 0000 0000 9314 1427, CIBER Enfermedades Infecciosas, ISCIII, ; Madrid, Spain
                [11 ]GRID grid.418710.b, ISNI 0000 0001 0665 4425, Department of Nutrition, , CEBAS-CSIC Institute, ; Espinardo University Campus, 30100 Murcia, Spain
                Article
                9615
                10.1038/s41598-022-09615-w
                9016385
                35440789
                70f8f4f5-964f-4201-95a7-71dee28d67b7
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 20 October 2021
                : 7 March 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Eusko Jaurlaritza
                Award ID: IT974-16
                Funded by: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
                Award ID: US18/21
                Funded by: Predoctoral contract of BioHealth research program of cantabria Government
                Funded by: Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla
                Award ID: INNVAL19/26
                Award ID: INNVAL20/01
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Erasmus program
                Funded by: Instituto de Salud Carlos III
                Award ID: DTS18-00022
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: European FEDER funds
                Funded by: Cost european action ENOVA
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Uncategorized
                computational biology and bioinformatics,immunology
                Uncategorized
                computational biology and bioinformatics, immunology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content235

                Cited by1

                Most referenced authors1,001