Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Viral Vectors for the in Vivo Delivery of CRISPR Components: Advances and Challenges

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR) and its accompanying protein (Cas9) are now the most effective, efficient, and precise genome editing techniques. Two essential components of the CRISPR/Cas9 system are guide RNA (gRNA) and CRISPR-associated (Cas9) proteins. Choosing and implementing safe and effective delivery systems in the therapeutic application of CRISPR/Cas9 has proven to be a significant problem. For in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, viral vectors are the natural specialists. Due to their higher delivery effectiveness than other delivery methods, vectors such as adenoviral vectors (AdVs), adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), and lentivirus vectors (LVs) are now commonly employed as delivery methods. This review thoroughly examined recent achievements in using a variety of viral vectors as a means of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, as well as the benefits and limitations of each viral vector. Future thoughts for overcoming the current restrictions and adapting the technology are also discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA

          Summary Most genetic variants that contribute to disease 1 are challenging to correct efficiently and without excess byproducts 2–5 . Here we describe prime editing, a versatile and precise genome editing method that directly writes new genetic information into a specified DNA site using a catalytically impaired Cas9 fused to an engineered reverse transcriptase, programmed with a prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA) that both specifies the target site and encodes the desired edit. We performed >175 edits in human cells including targeted insertions, deletions, and all 12 types of point mutations without requiring double-strand breaks or donor DNA templates. We applied prime editing in human cells to correct efficiently and with few byproducts the primary genetic causes of sickle cell disease (requiring a transversion in HBB) and Tay-Sachs disease (requiring a deletion in HEXA), to install a protective transversion in PRNP, and to precisely insert various tags and epitopes into target loci. Four human cell lines and primary post-mitotic mouse cortical neurons support prime editing with varying efficiencies. Prime editing shows higher or similar efficiency and fewer byproducts than homology-directed repair, complementary strengths and weaknesses compared to base editing, and much lower off-target editing than Cas9 nuclease at known Cas9 off-target sites. Prime editing substantially expands the scope and capabilities of genome editing, and in principle can correct up to 89% of known genetic variants associated with human diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Applications of genome editing technology in the targeted therapy of human diseases: mechanisms, advances and prospects

              Based on engineered or bacterial nucleases, the development of genome editing technologies has opened up the possibility of directly targeting and modifying genomic sequences in almost all eukaryotic cells. Genome editing has extended our ability to elucidate the contribution of genetics to disease by promoting the creation of more accurate cellular and animal models of pathological processes and has begun to show extraordinary potential in a variety of fields, ranging from basic research to applied biotechnology and biomedical research. Recent progress in developing programmable nucleases, such as zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)–Cas-associated nucleases, has greatly expedited the progress of gene editing from concept to clinical practice. Here, we review recent advances of the three major genome editing technologies (ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas9) and discuss the applications of their derivative reagents as gene editing tools in various human diseases and potential future therapies, focusing on eukaryotic cells and animal models. Finally, we provide an overview of the clinical trials applying genome editing platforms for disease treatment and some of the challenges in the implementation of this technology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1609410/overview
                Journal
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
                Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-4185
                12 May 2022
                2022
                : 10
                : 895713
                Affiliations
                Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University , Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Hamidreza Montazeri Aliabadi, Chapman University, United States

                Reviewed by: Tasos Gogakos, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States

                Thomas Gaj, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States

                *Correspondence: Misganaw Asmamaw Mengstie, misganaw118@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Preclinical Cell and Gene Therapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

                Article
                895713
                10.3389/fbioe.2022.895713
                9133430
                35646852
                705524bf-162a-413f-a6b8-62f5aaf77944
                Copyright © 2022 Asmamaw Mengstie.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 March 2022
                : 26 April 2022
                Categories
                Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Mini Review

                viral vectors,delivery,crispr,cas-9,genome editing,review
                viral vectors, delivery, crispr, cas-9, genome editing, review

                Comments

                Comment on this article