20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of Office-Based Physician Participation in Medicaid Managed Care and Health Insurance Exchange Plans in the Same US Geographic Markets

      research-article
      , PhD 1 , , , PhD 1 , , PhD 1
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          How does the percentage of office-based physicians who participate in Medicaid compare with participation in health insurance exchange plans?

          Findings

          In this cross-sectional study of 67 057 office-based physicians in 5 states, Medicaid managed care plans included more physicians than health insurance exchange plans in the same geographic markets.

          Meaning

          These findings indicate that physicians are likelier to participate in Medicaid physician networks than previously believed, with important implications for the ongoing debate about the role of Medicaid in expanding health insurance and reforming the US health care system.

          Abstract

          This cross-sectional study examines state and county physician network data sets to compare physician participation in Medicare networks with health insurance exchange networks.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Several recent policy proposals have sought to expand the role of Medicaid in providing health insurance for low-income Americans, but there is little recent information on how physician participation in Medicaid compares with alternative forms of coverage for low-income Americans.

          Objective

          To compare the number of office-based physicians included in Medicaid managed care and health insurance exchange plans that operate in the same geographic markets.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cross-sectional study used administrative data from physician network directories and survey data from office-based physicians for Kansas, Nebraska, New York, Tennessee, and Washington. The number of participants totaled 67 057 office-based physicians in the 5 sample states. Data were collected and analyzed from May 2018 to June 2019.

          Exposures

          Physician participation in a Medicaid managed care or health insurance exchange plan network.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The percentage of office-based physicians in a county who indicated during a phone survey that they participated in Medicaid; the percentage of office-based physicians in a county who participated in each Medicaid managed care and health insurance exchange plan network; and the percentage of office-based physicians in a county who participated in at least 1 Medicaid managed care plan or, separately, at least 1 health insurance exchange plan.

          Results

          Of the 67 057 office-based physicians in our sample, 49 983 reported in a telephone survey that they accepted Medicaid. This survey-based measure undercounted the percentage of physicians participating in Medicaid by 5.2% (95% CI, 2.3%-8.1%; P < .001) relative to a measure based on physician network directories. Medicaid managed care physician networks covered a median (interquartile range) of 63.4% (48.0%-81.3%) of office-based physicians compared with health insurance exchange physician networks, which covered 51.0% (31.0%-70.5%). In adjusted analyses, Medicaid managed care plans covered 6.2% (95% CI, 3.2%-9.3%, P < .001) more office-based physicians than health insurance exchange plans operating in the same counties. In the states where the same insurers participated in both markets (New York, Tennessee, Washington), the Medicaid managed care physician networks were 6.5% (95% CI, 3.2%-9.8%, P < .001) larger than the health insurance exchange networks offered by the same insurer.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this cross-sectional study of physician network data, Medicaid managed care physician networks included more office-based physicians than the physician networks of health insurance exchange plans operating in the same geographic markets. This suggests that Medicaid remains a viable option for expanding coverage in the United States.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Choice Inconsistencies Among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program.

          We evaluate the choices of elders across their insurance options under the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug plan, using a unique data set of prescription drug claims matched to information on the characteristics of choice sets. We document that elders place much more weight on plan premiums than on expected out of pocket costs; value plan financial characteristics beyond any impacts on their own financial expenses or risk; and place almost no value on variance reducing aspects of plans. Partial equilibrium welfare analysis implies that welfare would have been 27% higher if patients had all chosen rationally.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Auditing access to specialty care for children with public insurance.

            Health care reform has expanded eligibility to public insurance without fully addressing concerns about access. We measured children's access to outpatient specialty care to identify disparities in providers' acceptance of Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) versus private insurance. Between January and May 2010, research assistants called a stratified, random sample of clinics representing eight specialties in Cook County, Illinois, which has a high proportion of specialists. Callers posed as mothers of pediatric patients with common health conditions requiring outpatient specialty care. Two calls, separated by 1 month, were placed to each clinic by the same person with the use of a standardized clinical script that differed by insurance status. We completed 546 paired calls to 273 specialty clinics and found significant disparities in provider acceptance of Medicaid-CHIP versus private insurance across all tested specialties. Overall, 66% of Medicaid-CHIP callers (179 of 273) were denied an appointment as compared with 11% of privately insured callers (29 of 273) (relative risk, 6.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3 to 8.8; P<0.001). Among 89 clinics that accepted both insurance types, the average wait time for Medicaid-CHIP enrollees was 22 days longer than that for privately insured children (95% CI, 6.8 to 37.5; P=0.005). We found a disparity in access to outpatient specialty care between children with public insurance and those with private insurance. Policy interventions that encourage providers to accept patients with public insurance are needed to improve access to care.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Appointment availability after increases in Medicaid payments for primary care.

              Providing increases in Medicaid reimbursements for primary care, a key provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), raised Medicaid payments to Medicare levels in 2013 and 2014 for selected services and providers. The federally funded increase in reimbursements was aimed at expanding access to primary care for the growing number of Medicaid enrollees. The reimbursement increase expired at the end of 2014 in most states before policymakers had much empirical evidence about its effects.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                13 April 2020
                April 2020
                13 April 2020
                : 3
                : 4
                : e202727
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: February 18, 2020.
                Published: April 13, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2727
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Wallace J et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Jacob Wallace, PhD, Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College St, New Haven, CT 06510 ( jacob.wallace@ 123456yale.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Wallace had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: All authors.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Wallace, Lollo.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Wallace, Lollo.
                Obtained funding: Ndumele.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Wallace, Ndumele.
                Supervision: Wallace, Ndumele.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Wallace reported having a spouse who is the Associate Director for Medicaid Policy at a consulting firm. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: The conduct of this research was funded by a grant from the National, Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (5R01HL144644).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Additional Contributions: Dominique Desroches, BA, of the Yale School of Public Health provided research assistance for this study and was compensated as a paid team member.
                Article
                zoi200132
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2727
                7154801
                32282047
                70438404-e73e-46fb-9e1f-981c93e10599
                Copyright 2020 Wallace J et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 24 September 2019
                : 18 February 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Health Policy

                Comments

                Comment on this article