4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy and third‐wave cognitive behavioural interventions on diabetes‐related distress: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          Diabetes‐related distress is common in diabetes and has implications for well‐being. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and third‐wave CBT hold promise as treatments for diabetes‐related distress, although previous findings are inconclusive. We aimed to conduct a systematic review with meta‐analysis to understand the efficacy of these interventions in treating diabetes‐related distress, while also assessing the associative benefits of these interventions on depression, anxiety and glycaemic control. We also aimed to conduct a narrative synthesis, and subgroup analyses to identify intervention components most useful in treating diabetes‐related distress.

          Method

          We searched seven electronic databases from inception to April 2021. Data extraction was independently performed by two reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed. The protocol was registered with the Prospective Register Of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42021240628.

          Results

          We included 22 randomised controlled trials investigating the efficacy of CBT and third‐wave CBT interventions on diabetes‐related distress. CBT for diabetes‐related distress significantly reduced distress (SMD = −0.278, p = 0.010) and depression (SMD = −0.604, p = 0.016). Third‐wave CBT for diabetes‐related distress significantly reduced anxiety (SMD = −0.451, p = 0.034). No significant effect of either intervention on glycated haemoglobin was observed. CBT interventions that included a digital component, were delivered by a psychological practitioner, and included behavioural activation bolstered the effects on diabetes‐related distress.

          Conclusions

          CBT aiming to target diabetes‐related distress is beneficial for distress and depression. Third‐wave CBT for diabetes‐related distress is beneficial for anxiety. More work is needed to optimise interventions to improve both mental and physical health outcomes in people with diabetes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

            Without a complete published description of interventions, clinicians and patients cannot reliably implement interventions that are shown to be useful, and other researchers cannot replicate or build on research findings. The quality of description of interventions in publications, however, is remarkably poor. To improve the completeness of reporting, and ultimately the replicability, of interventions, an international group of experts and stakeholders developed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. The process involved a literature review for relevant checklists and research, a Delphi survey of an international panel of experts to guide item selection, and a face to face panel meeting. The resultant 12 item TIDieR checklist (brief name, why, what (materials), what (procedure), who provided, how, where, when and how much, tailoring, modifications, how well (planned), how well (actual)) is an extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement (item 5) and the SPIRIT 2013 statement (item 11). While the emphasis of the checklist is on trials, the guidance is intended to apply across all evaluative study designs. This paper presents the TIDieR checklist and guide, with an explanation and elaboration for each item, and examples of good reporting. The TIDieR checklist and guide should improve the reporting of interventions and make it easier for authors to structure accounts of their interventions, reviewers and editors to assess the descriptions, and readers to use the information.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

              The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ruth.hackett@kcl.ac.uk
                Journal
                Diabet Med
                Diabet Med
                10.1111/(ISSN)1464-5491
                DME
                Diabetic Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0742-3071
                1464-5491
                16 September 2022
                November 2022
                : 39
                : 11 ( doiID: 10.1111/dme.v39.11 )
                : e14948
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Health Psychology Section, Department of Psychology Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Ruth A. Hackett, Health Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

                Email: ruth.hackett@ 123456kcl.ac.uk

                Article
                DME14948 DME-2022-00283.R2
                10.1111/dme.14948
                9826380
                36031793
                70380597-72a3-4969-9303-3d8a2b85c956
                © 2022 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 28 April 2022
                : 25 August 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 2, Pages: 20, Words: 8572
                Funding
                Funded by: King's College London Department of Psychology
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Systematic Reviews
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                November 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.3 mode:remove_FC converted:08.01.2023

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                acceptance and commitment therapy,cognitive behavioural therapy,diabetes mellitus, type 1,diabetes mellitus, type 2,mindfulness,psychological distress

                Comments

                Comment on this article