13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Contemporary Thyroid Nodule Evaluation and Management

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context

          Approximately 60% of adults harbor 1 or more thyroid nodules. The possibility of cancer is the overriding concern, but only about 5% prove to be malignant. The widespread use of diagnostic imaging and improved access to health care favor the discovery of small, subclinical nodules and small papillary cancers. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment is associated with potentially excessive costs and nonnegligible morbidity for patients.

          Evidence Acquisition

          We conducted a PubMed search for the recent English-language articles dealing with thyroid nodule management.

          Evidence Synthesis

          The initial assessment includes an evaluation of clinical risk factors and sonographic examination of the neck. Sonographic risk-stratification systems (e.g., Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems) can be used to estimate the risk of malignancy and the need for biopsy based on nodule features and size. When cytology findings are indeterminate, molecular analysis of the aspirate may obviate the need for diagnostic surgery. Many nodules will not require biopsy. These nodules and those that are cytologically benign can be managed with long-term follow-up alone. If malignancy is suspected, options include surgery (increasingly less extensive), active surveillance or, in selected cases, minimally invasive techniques.

          Conclusion

          Thyroid nodule evaluation is no longer a 1-size-fits-all proposition. For most nodules, the likelihood of malignancy can be confidently estimated without resorting to cytology or molecular testing, and low-frequency surveillance is sufficient for most patients. When there are multiple options for diagnosis and/or treatment, they should be discussed with patients as frankly as possible to identify an approach that best meets their needs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references101

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          European Thyroid Association Guidelines for Ultrasound Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules in Adults: The EU-TIRADS

          Thyroid ultrasound (US) is a key examination for the management of thyroid nodules. Thyroid US is easily accessible, noninvasive, and cost-effective, and is a mandatory step in the workup of thyroid nodules. The main disadvantage of the method is that it is operator dependent. Thyroid US assessment of the risk of malignancy is crucial in patients with nodules, in order to select those who should have a fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy performed. Due to the pivotal role of thyroid US in the management of patients with nodules, the European Thyroid Association convened a panel of international experts to set up European guidelines on US risk stratification of thyroid nodules. Based on a review of the literature and on the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American Thyroid Association, and Korean guidelines, the panel created the novel European Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data System, called EU-TIRADS. This comprises a thyroid US lexicon; a standardized report; definitions of benign and low-, intermediate-, and high-risk nodules, with the estimated risks of malignancy in each category; and indications for FNA. Illustrated by numerous US images, the EU-TIRADS aims to serve physicians in their clinical practice, to enhance the interobserver reproducibility of descriptions, and to simplify communication of the results.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patient age is significantly related to the progression of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid under observation.

            We showed previously that subclinical low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) could be observed without immediate surgery. Patient age is an important prognostic factor of clinical papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). In this study, we investigated how patient age influences the observation of low-risk PTMC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An observational trial for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in Japanese patients.

              The recent development and spread of ultrasonography and ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) has facilitated the detection of small papillary microcarcinomas of the thyroid measuring 1 cm or less (PMC). The marked difference in prevalence between clinical thyroid carcinoma and PMC detected on mass screening prompted us to observe PMC unless the lesion shows unfavorable features, such as location adjacent to the trachea or on the dorsal surface of the thyroid possibly invading the recurrent laryngeal nerve, clinically apparent nodal metastasis, or high-grade malignancy on FNAB findings. In the present study we report comparison of the outcomes of 340 patients with PMC who underwent observation and the prognosis of 1,055 patients who underwent immediate surgery without observation. Between 1993 and 2004, 340 patients underwent observation and 1,055 underwent surgical treatment without observation. These 1,395 patients were enrolled in the present study. Observation periods ranged from 18 to 187 months (average 74 months). The proportions of patients whose PMC showed enlargement by 3 mm or more were 6.4 and 15.9% on 5-year and 10-year follow-up, respectively. Novel nodal metastasis was detected in 1.4% at 5 years and 3.4% at 10 years. There were no factors related to patient background or clinical features linked to either tumor enlargement or the novel appearance of nodal metastasis. After observation 109 of the 340 patients underwent surgical treatment for various reasons, and none of those patients showed carcinoma recurrence. In patients who underwent immediate surgical treatment, clinically apparent lateral node metastasis (N1b) and male gender were recognized as independent prognostic factors of disease-free survival. Papillary microcarcinomas that are not associated with unfavorable features can be candidates for observation regardless of patient background and clinical features. If there are subsequent signs of progression, such as tumor enlargement and novel nodal metastasis, it would not be too late to perform surgical treatment. Even though the primary tumor is small, careful surgical treatment including therapeutic modified neck dissection is necessary for N1b PMC patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Endocrinol Metab
                J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab
                jcem
                The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0021-972X
                1945-7197
                September 2020
                03 June 2020
                03 June 2020
                : 105
                : 9
                : dgaa322
                Affiliations
                Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome, Italy
                Author notes
                Correspondence and Reprint Requests : Cosimo Durante, MD, PhD, Dipartimento di Medicina Traslazionale e di Precisione, Università di Roma “Sapienza,” Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Roma, Italy. E-mail: cosimo.durante@ 123456uniroma1.it .
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0388-1283
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0736-1047
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5693-2988
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2709-533X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1791-5915
                Article
                dgaa322
                10.1210/clinem/dgaa322
                7365695
                32491169
                702d25e0-0d25-40aa-8584-fc0c45d51a4c
                © Endocrine Society 2020.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 March 2020
                : 27 May 2020
                : 16 July 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 15
                Funding
                Funded by: The Umberto Di Mario Foundation;
                Categories
                Mini-Review
                AcademicSubjects/MED00250

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                biopsy,risk assessment,risk factors,tirads,ultrasonography,watchful waiting
                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                biopsy, risk assessment, risk factors, tirads, ultrasonography, watchful waiting

                Comments

                Comment on this article