Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      When fertile, women seek status via prestige but not dominance

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Seeking status is a fundamental human motive, but scholars disagree on the biological processes that underpin it. Here, I examine the relationship between the menstrual cycle and two pathways to human status attainment, showing that women seek status via prestige but not dominance when their likelihood of conception is high. Additional analyses show that women have higher self-esteem yet lose more dominance contests when fertile, a strategy that may paradoxically help them retain their influence and good social reputation. These results show that the menstrual cycle is a biological correlate of status seeking among women and that fertility may motivate them to maximize social capital through influence and admiration.

          Abstract

          Biological predictors of human dominance are hotly contested, with far-reaching implications for psychological sex differences and the placement of men and women in the social hierarchy. Most investigations have focused on dominance in men and testosterone, with diminished attention paid to dominance in women and other biological mechanisms. Investigating biological influences on other routes to status attainment popular among women—such as via prestige in addition to dominance—have also been neglected. Here, I examined whether status seeking via prestige and via dominance covaried with fertility probability in a citizen science project spanning 14 countries and 4 world regions. Across 4,179 observations, participants tracked their menstrual cycle characteristics, motivation for prestige and dominance, dominance contest outcomes, and three domains of self-esteem. Self-esteem is predicted by status within a group and helps individuals navigate social hierarchies. Bayesian mixed models controlling for menstruation indicated that the motivation to obtain status via prestige but not dominance peaked when conception was most likely, as did dominance contest losses and two self-esteem domains. Fertility appears to reorient female psychology toward prestige-based strategies to success, enhancing women’s desire for social capital through influence and admiration but not through fear, coercion, or intimidation. These insights fundamentally advance the understanding of the biological correlates of status seeking among women. They further suggest that fertility motivates not only mating competition but gaining rank and positive regard in social hierarchies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A theory of human motivation.

          A. MASLOW (1943)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.

            A hypothesized need to form and maintain strong, stable interpersonal relationships is evaluated in light of the empirical literature. The need is for frequent, nonaversive interactions within an ongoing relational bond. Consistent with the belongingness hypothesis, people form social attachments readily under most conditions and resist the dissolution of existing bonds. Belongingness appears to have multiple and strong effects on emotional patterns and on cognitive processes. Lack of attachments is linked to a variety of ill effects on health, adjustment, and well-being. Other evidence, such as that concerning satiation, substitution, and behavioral consequences, is likewise consistent with the hypothesized motivation. Several seeming counterexamples turned out not to disconfirm the hypothesis. Existing evidence supports the hypothesis that the need to belong is a powerful, fundamental, and extremely pervasive motivation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Social learning strategies.

              In most studies of social learning in animals, no attempt has been made to examine the nature of the strategy adopted by animals when they copy others. Researchers have expended considerable effort in exploring the psychological processes that underlie social learning and amassed extensive data banks recording purported social learning in the field, but the contexts under which animals copy others remain unexplored. Yet, theoretical models used to investigate the adaptive advantages of social learning lead to the conclusion that social learning cannot be indiscriminate and that individuals should adopt strategies that dictate the circumstances under which they copy others and from whom they learn. In this article, I discuss a number of possible strategies that are predicted by theoretical analyses, including copy when uncertain, copy the majority, and copy if better, and consider the empirical evidence in support of each, drawing from both the animal and human social learning literature. Reliance on social learning strategies may be organized hierarchically, their being employed by animals when unlearned and asocially learned strategies prove ineffective but before animals take recourse in innovation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                7 November 2022
                15 November 2022
                7 May 2023
                : 119
                : 46
                : e2205451119
                Affiliations
                [1] aMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by Susan Fiske, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ; received March 31, 2022; accepted September 2, 2022

                Author contributions: K.R.B. designed research, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-4120
                Article
                202205451
                10.1073/pnas.2205451119
                9674267
                36343265
                6fd5d002-a727-4f9d-a9ad-51fb1acb2578
                Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                : 02 September 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) 501100000923
                Award ID: DE210100800
                Award Recipient : Khandis R. Blake
                Categories
                Biological Sciences
                Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

                dominance,prestige,status,fertility,menstrual cycle
                dominance, prestige, status, fertility, menstrual cycle

                Comments

                Comment on this article