17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Targeting hunter distribution based on host resource selection and kill sites to manage disease risk

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Endemic and emerging diseases are rarely uniform in their spatial distribution or prevalence among cohorts of wildlife. Spatial models that quantify risk-driven differences in resource selection and hunter mortality of animals at fine spatial scales can assist disease management by identifying high-risk areas and individuals. We used resource selection functions (RSFs) and selection ratios (SRs) to quantify sex- and age-specific resource selection patterns of collared ( n = 67) and hunter-killed ( n = 796) nonmigratory elk ( Cervus canadensis manitobensis) during the hunting season between 2002 and 2012, in southwestern Manitoba, Canada. Distance to protected area was the most important covariate influencing resource selection and hunter-kill sites of elk (AICw = 1.00). Collared adult males (which are most likely to be infected with bovine tuberculosis ( Mycobacterium bovis) and chronic wasting disease) rarely selected for sites outside of parks during the hunting season in contrast to adult females and juvenile males. The RSFs showed selection by adult females and juvenile males to be negatively associated with landscape-level forest cover, high road density, and water cover, whereas hunter-kill sites of these cohorts were positively associated with landscape-level forest cover and increasing distance to streams and negatively associated with high road density. Local-level forest was positively associated with collared animal locations and hunter-kill sites; however, selection was stronger for collared juvenile males and hunter-killed adult females. In instances where disease infects a metapopulation and eradication is infeasible, a principle goal of management is to limit the spread of disease among infected animals. We map high-risk areas that are regularly used by potentially infectious hosts but currently underrepresented in the distribution of kill sites. We present a novel application of widely available data to target hunter distribution based on host resource selection and kill sites as a promising tool for applying selective hunting to the management of transmissible diseases in a game species.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          R: A language and enviornment for statistical computing

          (2010)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Effects of Humans on Behaviour of Wildlife Exceed Those of Natural Predators in a Landscape of Fear

            Background Human disturbance can influence wildlife behaviour, which can have implications for wildlife populations. For example, wildlife may be more vigilant near human disturbance, resulting in decreased forage intake and reduced reproductive success. We measured the effects of human activities compared to predator and other environmental factors on the behaviour of elk (Cervus elaphus Linnaeus 1758) in a human-dominated landscape in Alberta, Canada. Methodology/Principal Findings We collected year-round behavioural data of elk across a range of human disturbances. We estimated linear mixed models of elk behaviour and found that human factors (land-use type, traffic and distance from roads) and elk herd size accounted for more than 80% of variability in elk vigilance. Elk decreased their feeding time when closer to roads, and road traffic volumes of at least 1 vehicle every 2 hours induced elk to switch into a more vigilant behavioural mode with a subsequent loss in feeding time. Other environmental factors, thought crucial in shaping vigilance behaviour in elk (natural predators, reproductive status of females), were not important. The highest levels of vigilance were recorded on public lands where hunting and motorized recreational activities were cumulative compared to the national park during summer, which had the lowest levels of vigilance. Conclusions/Significance In a human-dominated landscape, effects of human disturbance on elk behaviour exceed those of habitat and natural predators. Humans trigger increased vigilance and decreased foraging in elk. However, it is not just the number of people but also the type of human activity that influences elk behaviour (e.g. hiking vs. hunting). Quantifying the actual fitness costs of human disturbance remains a challenge in field studies but should be a primary focus for future researches. Some species are much more likely to be disturbed by humans than by non-human predators: for these species, quantifying human disturbance may be the highest priority for conservation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Foraging in the ‘landscape of fear’ and its implications for habitat use and diet quality of elk Cervus elaphus and bison Bison bison

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                ece3
                Ecology and Evolution
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd
                2045-7758
                2045-7758
                October 2013
                01 October 2013
                : 3
                : 12
                : 4265-4277
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Animal and Poultry Science, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E2, Canada
                [2 ]Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University Frederiksborgvej 399, Roskilde, 4000, Denmark
                [3 ]Département de Biologie, Université de Sherbrooke 2500 boul. de l'université, Sherbrooke, QC, J1K 2R1, Canada
                [4 ]Department of Animal and Poultry Science & Indigenous Land Management Institute, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E2, Canada
                Author notes
                Ryan K. Brook, Department of Animal and Poultry Science & Indigenous Land Management Institute, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada. Tel: 306 966 4120; Fax: 306 966 4151; E-mail: ryan.brook@ 123456usask.ca

                Funding Information This project was supported by Parks Canada (Riding Mountain National Park), PrioNet Canada, University of Saskatchewan, Manitoba Conservation, Canadian Council on Ecological Areas, Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives, Riding Mountain Biosphere Reserve, Nature Conservancy of Canada, Manitoba Wildlife Federation, Louisiana Pacific, Earth Rhythms Inc., Eastlands, Westlake and Seven Oaks Wildlife Associations, Friends of Riding Mountain National Park, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

                Article
                10.1002/ece3.788
                3853570
                6fb66ecd-44b4-4e4e-8b59-578668863f87
                © 2013 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.

                History
                : 13 May 2013
                : 14 August 2013
                : 28 August 2013
                Categories
                Original Research

                Evolutionary Biology
                bovine tuberculosis,chronic wasting disease,elk,hunter-kill,mortality,protected area,resource selection function,selection ratio

                Comments

                Comment on this article