47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The Collagen Suprafamily: From Biosynthesis to Advanced Biomaterial Development

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references615

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes.

          Biologic scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are typically derived by processes that involve decellularization of tissues or organs. Preservation of the complex composition and three-dimensional ultrastructure of the ECM is highly desirable but it is recognized that all methods of decellularization result in disruption of the architecture and potential loss of surface structure and composition. Physical methods and chemical and biologic agents are used in combination to lyse cells, followed by rinsing to remove cell remnants. Effective decellularization methodology is dictated by factors such as tissue density and organization, geometric and biologic properties desired for the end product, and the targeted clinical application. Tissue decellularization with preservation of ECM integrity and bioactivity can be optimized by making educated decisions regarding the agents and techniques utilized during processing. An overview of decellularization methods, their effect upon resulting ECM structure and composition, and recently described perfusion techniques for whole organ decellularization techniques are presented herein. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds.

            The biological activity of scaffolds used in tissue engineering applications hypothetically depends on the density of available ligands, scaffold sites at which specific cell binding occurs. Ligand density is characterized by the composition of the scaffold, which defines the surface density of ligands, and by the specific surface area of the scaffold, which defines the total surface of the structure exposed to the cells. It has been previously shown that collagen-glycosaminoglycan (CG) scaffolds used for studies of skin regeneration were inactive when the mean pore size was either lower than 20 microm or higher than 120 microm (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 86(3) (1989) 933). To study the relationship between cell attachment and viability in scaffolds and the scaffold structure, CG scaffolds with a constant composition and solid volume fraction (0.005), but with four different pore sizes corresponding to four levels of specific surface area were manufactured using a lyophilization technique. MC3T3-E1 mouse clonal osteogenic cells were seeded onto the four scaffold types and maintained in culture. At the experimental end point (24 or 48 h), the remaining viable cells were counted to determine the percent cell attachment. A significant difference in viable cell attachment was observed in scaffolds with different mean pore sizes after 24 and 48 h; however, there was no significant change in cell attachment between 24 and 48 h for any group. The fraction of viable cells attached to the CG scaffold decreased with increasing mean pore size, increasing linearly (R2 = 0.95, 0.91 at 24 and 48 h, respectively) with the specific surface area of the scaffold. The strong correlation between the scaffold specific surface area and cell attachment indicates that cell attachment and viability are primarily influenced by scaffold specific surface area over this range (95.9-150.5 microm) of pore sizes for MC3T3 cells.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A simplified method for the analysis of hydroxyproline in biological tissues.

              A critical study of the different steps involved in previous procedure for hydroxyproline assay allows the direct measurement of collagen content in tissue' homogenates without losing the advantages of the method. The procedure is based on alkaline hydrolysis of the tissue homogenate and subsequent determination of the free hydroxyproline in hydrolyzates. Chloramine-T was used to oxidize the free hydroxyproline for the production of a pyrrole. The addition of Ehrlich's reagent resulted in the formation of a chromophore that can be measured at 550 nm. Optimal assay conditions were determined using tissue homogenate and purified acid soluble collagen along with standard hydroxyproline. Critical parameters such as the amount of chloramine-T, sodium hydroxide, p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde, pH of the reaction buffer, and length of oxidation time were examined to obtain satisfactory results. The method has been applied to samples of tissue homogenate and purified acid soluble collagen, with recovery of added hydroxyproline of 101 +/- 6.5 and 104 +/- 6.0 (SD) percent, respectively. The method is highly sensitive and reproducible when used to measure the imino acid in tissue homogenates. The modified hydroxyproline assay presented in this communication will be useful for routine measurement of collagen content in extracts of various tissue specimens. In addition, the modified method can be used for batch processing of column fractions to monitor the collagen concentrations during purification.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Advanced Materials
                Adv. Mater.
                Wiley
                09359648
                January 2019
                January 2019
                August 20 2018
                : 31
                : 1
                : 1801651
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Regenerative, Modular and Developmental Engineering Laboratory (REMODEL); Biomedical Sciences Building; National University of Ireland Galway (NUI Galway); Galway Ireland
                [2 ]Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) Centre for Research in Medical Devices (CÚRAM); Biomedical Sciences Building; National University of Ireland Galway (NUI Galway); Galway Ireland
                [3 ]Centre for Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering; Competence Centre Tissue Engineering for Drug Development (TEDD); Department Life Sciences and Facility Management; Institute for Chemistry and Biotechnology (ICBT); Zürich University of Applied Sciences; Wädenswil Switzerland
                [4 ]Teagasc Research Centre; Ashtown Ireland
                [5 ]Sofradim Production-A Medtronic Company; Trevoux France
                Article
                10.1002/adma.201801651
                30126066
                6fa04a91-50b3-4f14-8a70-511e948124f3
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article