20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      QRS Complex Detection and Measurement Algorithms for Multichannel ECGs in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We developed an automated approach for QRS complex detection and QRS duration (QRSd) measurement that can effectively analyze multichannel electrocardiograms (MECGs) acquired during abnormal conduction and pacing in heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients to enable the use of MECGs to characterize cardiac activation in such patients. The algorithms use MECGs acquired with a custom 53-electrode investigational body surface mapping system and were validated using previously collected data from 58 CRT patients. An expert cohort analyzed the same data to determine algorithm accuracy and error. The algorithms: 1) detect QRS complexes; 2) identify complexes of the most prevalent morphology and morphologic outliers; and 3) determine the array-specific (i.e., anterior and posterior) and global QRS complex onsets, offsets, and durations for the detected complexes. The QRS complex detection algorithm had a positive predictivity and sensitivity of ≥96% for complex detection and classification. The absolute QRSd error was 17 ± 14 ms, or 12%, for array-specific QRSd and 12 ± 10 ms, or 8%, for global QRSd. The absolute global QRSd error (12 ms) was less than the interobserver variation in that measurement (15 ± 10 ms). The sensitivity, positive predictivity, and error of the algorithms were similar to the values reported for current state-of-the-art algorithms designed for and limited to simpler data sets and conduction patterns and within the variation found in clinical 12-lead ECG QRSd measurement techniques. These new algorithms permit accurate, real-time analysis of QRS complex features in MECGs in patients with conduction disorders and/or pacing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          ECG-based heartbeat classification for arrhythmia detection: A survey.

          An electrocardiogram (ECG) measures the electric activity of the heart and has been widely used for detecting heart diseases due to its simplicity and non-invasive nature. By analyzing the electrical signal of each heartbeat, i.e., the combination of action impulse waveforms produced by different specialized cardiac tissues found in the heart, it is possible to detect some of its abnormalities. In the last decades, several works were developed to produce automatic ECG-based heartbeat classification methods. In this work, we survey the current state-of-the-art methods of ECG-based automated abnormalities heartbeat classification by presenting the ECG signal preprocessing, the heartbeat segmentation techniques, the feature description methods and the learning algorithms used. In addition, we describe some of the databases used for evaluation of methods indicated by a well-known standard developed by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and described in ANSI/AAMI EC57:1998/(R)2008 (ANSI/AAMI, 2008). Finally, we discuss limitations and drawbacks of the methods in the literature presenting concluding remarks and future challenges, and also we propose an evaluation process workflow to guide authors in future works.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Analysis of first-derivative based QRS detection algorithms.

            Accurate QRS detection is an important first step for the analysis of heart rate variability. Algorithms based on the differentiated ECG are computationally efficient and hence ideal for real-time analysis of large datasets. Here, we analyze traditional first-derivative based squaring function (Hamilton-Tompkins) and Hilbert transform-based methods for QRS detection and their modifications with improved detection thresholds. On a standard ECG dataset, the Hamilton-Tompkins algorithm had the highest detection accuracy (99.68% sensitivity, 99.63% positive predictivity) but also the largest time error. The modified Hamilton-Tompkins algorithm as well as the Hilbert transform-based algorithms had comparable, though slightly lower, accuracy; yet these automated algorithms present an advantage for real-time applications by avoiding human intervention in threshold determination. The high accuracy of the Hilbert transform-based method compared to detection with the second derivative of the ECG is ascribable to its inherently uniform magnitude spectrum. For all algorithms, detection errors occurred mainly in beats with decreased signal slope, such as wide arrhythmic beats or attenuated beats. For best performance, a combination of the squaring function and Hilbert transform-based algorithms can be applied such that differences in detection will point to abnormalities in the signal that can be further analyzed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Relation between QT intervals and heart rates from 40 to 120 beats/min in rest electrocardiograms of men and a simple method to adjust QT interval values.

              The aim of this study was to establish the relation between QT intervals and a wide range of rest heart rates in men. These data provided the basis of a simple method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate. Earlier correction equations give conflicting results, especially at low and high heart rates. The QT intervals were measured in 324 electrocardiograms of healthy young men. The sample was weighted for low and high heart rates. A curve relating QT intervals and heart rates from 40 to 120 beats/min was constructed. The QT interval at 60 beats/min was used as the reference value, and an adjusting nomogram for different heart rates was created. The reliabilities of the nomogram and three earlier QT correction equations were tested in the study group and in 396 middle-aged men. The nomogram method presented (QTNc = QT + correcting number) adjusted the QT interval most accurately over the whole range of heart rates on the basis of smallest mean-squared residual values between measured and predicted QT intervals. The Fridericia formula (QTFc = QT/RR1/3) gave the best correction at low, but failed at high, heart rates. The linear regression equation (QTLc = QT + 0.154[1 - RR], Framingham Study) was reliable at normal, but failed at low and high, heart rates. The Bazett formula (QTc = QT/RR1/2) performed poorest at all heart rates. The relation between QT and RR intervals was determined by three linear regressions expressing the slopes 0.116 for heart rates 100 beats/min. The QT-RR relation over a wide range of heart rates does not permit the use of one simple adjustment equation. A nomogram providing, for every heart rate, the number of milliseconds that the QT interval must be corrected gives excellent adjustment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med
                IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med
                0063400
                JTEHM
                IJTEBN
                IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine
                IEEE
                2168-2372
                2018
                05 June 2018
                : 6
                : 1900211
                Affiliations
                [1]departmentBiomedical Engineering Department, institutionUniversity of Minnesota; MinneapolisMN55455USA
                [2]institutionUnited Heart and Vascular Clinic Research Department; St. PaulMN55102USA
                Author notes
                Article
                1900211
                10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2844195
                6231906
                30443440
                6f5e20e6-77b3-4349-b288-5e266d38c548
                2168-2372 © 2018 IEEE. Translations and content mining are permitted for academic research only. Personal use is also permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
                History
                : 07 April 2018
                : 10 May 2018
                : 20 May 2018
                : 12 June 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 5, Equations: 49, References: 35, Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: Medtronic, fundref 10.13039/100004374;
                This work was supported by the Medtronic External Research Program, Medtronic plc.
                Categories
                Article

                biomedical signal processing,classification algorithms,detection algorithms,electrocardiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article