14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Endoscopic salvage of a large esophagojejunostomy dehiscence

      brief-report
      , MD 1 , , MD 2 , , MD 2 , , MD 3 , , MD 4
      VideoGIE
      Elsevier
      EJA, esophagojejunostomy anastomosis

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Esophagojejunostomy anastomosis (EJA) dehiscence is not uncommon (up to 3% to 15%).1, 2 Management can be challenging depending on the size and location, and it frequently requires surgical repair, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. 3 Although endoscopic clipping is commonly described in the literature for a dehiscence smaller than 2 cm, 4 we describe the successful endoscopic salvage of a large 4-cm EJA dehiscence by use of a combined technique of flexible endoscopic suturing and covered metal stent placement. Our patient was a 34-year-old woman with invasive diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent total gastrectomy with en bloc splenectomy, distal esophagectomy, subtotal pancreatectomy, and intraoperative percutaneous jejunal tube placement. Seven days postoperatively she experienced septic shock, empyema, and tension pneumothorax, resulting in the placement of chest tubes. An EJA leak was suspected, and upper endoscopy showed a greater than 50% circumferential dehiscence of the EJA (Fig. 1). On endoscopy, lavage of the pleural cavity was done with a total of 500 mL of 1.5% hydrogen peroxide and normal saline solution with scant indigo carmine. The latter was used to observe the change in color of chest tube output and to determine whether this cavity was actively being drained. This was followed by placement of an 18 mm × 150 mm fully covered metal stent as a bridge for surgery (Fig. 2). The stent was clipped to the esophageal wall to prevent stent migration. Clipping was possible, given that an adequate fold was obtained, with sufficient grasp of tissue and stent allowing for a fixation. Suturing can help to obviate migration, but migration can still occur with sutures as a result of metal scaffold cutting into the thread. Furthermore, the use of clips is less expensive than the endoscopic suturing kit. Figure 1 Upper endoscopy showing >50% circumferential dehiscence of esophagojejunostomy anastomosis. Figure 2 Fully covered metal stent (18 mm × 150 mm) was placed as a bridge for surgery. Four weeks later, she was still dependent on 1 chest tube, and an esophagogram showed a persistent leak at the EJA, even though the stent was in place. A multidisciplinary team, including the patient and her family, reached a consensus to attempt endoscopic closure of the EJA dehiscence instead of surgery. At subsequent endoscopy, the old stent was removed and the dehiscence was evaluated (Fig. 3). Lavage of the pleural cavity was repeated. The surface of the EJA dehiscence was debrided, and the proximal loop of the jejunum was approximated toward the distal tip of the esophagus while the tissue anchor drove the suture material through the jejunal and the esophageal walls at the anastomosis site. This dehiscence was closed with 7 interrupted endoscopic sutures by use of an over-the-scope endoscopic suturing device (Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7; Video 1, available online at www.VideoGIE.org). Next, a new fully covered metal stent (18 mm × 150 mm) was deployed traversing the anastomosis, in suspicion of an area of narrowing distal to the anastomosis that could create a back pressure leak. The stent was again clipped to the esophageal wall to prevent stent migration because this approach was successful with the first stent. The patient improved clinically, and the chest tube was removed in 1 week. One month later, the stent was removed endoscopically, showing an intact anastomosis site without dehiscence (Fig. 8). No leak was seen on an esophagogram (Fig. 9). At 6 months, she had no upper GI symptoms. Figure 3 Repeat endoscopy to re-evaluate esophagojejunostomy anastomosis dehiscence for persistent leak. The metal stent was removed. Figure 4 Endoscopic suturing system. The helix device is shown, which helps in placement of full-thickness sutures. Figure 5 Full-thickness suture being placed. Figure 6 The curved hollow needle has to be reloaded with the suture before placement of further sutures. Figure 7 Endoscopic view after placement of 7 interrupted endoscopic sutures with over-the-scope endoscopic suturing device. Figure 8 Intact esophagojejunostomy anastomosis after over-the-scope endoscopic suturing (1 month follow-up). Figure 9 Esophagram before and after over-the-scope endoscopic suturing. A new fully covered metal stent (18 mm × 150 mm) was deployed traversing the anastomosis (right). Esophageal endoscopic suturing has been described in animal models for defects up to 2.5 cm and in 1 human patient up to 2 cm.5, 6 Endoscopic suturing of large esophageal defects is uncommon, and the clinical experience has been limited, although it is evolving. 4 However, our success at closing a 4-cm EJA dehiscence with significant clinical improvement on long-term follow-up supports the use of endoscopic therapy in selected cases with larger defects. We provide important evidence that the management of esophageal full-thickness wounds by use of a combination of endoscopic suturing and stenting is possible, relatively quick, and safe when done in experienced centers. Disclosure All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevention of anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy with perioperative supplemental oxygen administration: a prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled, single-center trial.

          The role of supplemental oxygen therapy in the healing of esophagojejunal anastomosis is still very much in an experimental stage. The aim of the present prospective, randomized study was to assess the effect of administration of perioperative supplemental oxygen therapy on esophagojejunal anastomosis, where the risk of leakage is high. We enrolled 171 patients between January 2009 and April 2012 who underwent elective open esophagojejunal anastomosis for gastric cancer. Patients were assigned randomly to an oxygen/air mixture with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 30 % (n = 85) or 80 % (n = 86). Administration commenced after induction of anesthesia and was maintained for 6 h after surgery. The overall anastomotic leak rate was 14.6 % (25 of 171): 17 patients (20 %) had an anastomotic dehiscence in the 30 % FiO2 group and 8 (9.3 %) in the 80 % FiO2 group (P < 0.05). The risk of anastomotic leak was 49 % lower in the 80 % FiO2 group (relative risk 0.61; 95 % confidence interval 0.40-0.95) versus 30 % FiO2. Supplemental 80 % FiO2 provided during and for 6 h after major gastric cancer surgery to reduce postoperative anastomotic dehiscence should be considered part of ongoing quality improvement activities related to surgical care, with few risks to the patient and little associated cost.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage after total gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: options of treatment.

            Esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage after total gastrectomy (TG) for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma (ADC) constitutes one of the most serious and sometimes life-threatening complications. Management remains controversial and still challenging.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Endoscopic Closure of Acute Esophageal Perforations

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                VideoGIE
                VideoGIE
                VideoGIE
                Elsevier
                2468-4481
                10 May 2017
                July 2017
                10 May 2017
                : 2
                : 7
                : 176-178
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
                [2 ]Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
                [3 ]Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
                [4 ]Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
                Article
                S2468-4481(17)30087-5
                10.1016/j.vgie.2017.04.007
                5991902
                6f2f6dfa-96c6-4eac-b8d2-976f5df8296b
                Copyright © 2017 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Video Case Report

                eja, esophagojejunostomy anastomosis
                eja, esophagojejunostomy anastomosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article