Micromechanical analysis and fracture mechanics of Poly(lactic acid) (PLA)/Polycaprolactone (PCL) binary blends

Polylactide polymers have gained enormous attention as a replacement for conventional synthetic packaging materials in the last decade. By being truly biodegradable, derived from renewable resources and by providing consumers with extra end-use benefits such as avoiding paying the "green tax" in Germany or meeting environmental regulations in Japan, polylactides (PLAs) are a growing alternative as a packaging material for demanding markets. The aim of this paper is to review the production techniques for PLAs, summarize the main properties of PLA and to delineate the main advantages and disadvantages of PLA as a polymeric packaging material. PLA films have better ultraviolet light barrier properties than low density polyethylene (LDPE), but they are slightly worse than those of cellophane, polystyrene (PS) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). PLA films have mechanical properties comparable to those of PET and better than those of PS. PLA also has lower melting and glass transition temperatures than PET and PS. The glass transition temperature of PLA changes with time. Humidity between 10 and 95% and storage temperatures of 5 to 40 degrees C do not have an effect on the transition temperature of PLA, which can be explained by its low water sorption values (i.e. <100 ppm at Aw = 1). PLA seals well at temperatures below the melting temperature but an appreciable shrinking of the films has been noted when the material is sealed near its melting temperature. Solubility parameter predictions indicate that PLA will interact with nitrogen compounds, anhydrides and some alcohols and that it will not interact with aromatic hydrocarbons, ketones, esters, sulfur compounds or water. The CO2, O2 and water permeability coefficients of PLA are lower than those of PS and higher than those of PET. Its barrier to ethyl acetate and D-limonene is comparable to PET. The amount of lactic acid and its derivatives that migrate to food simulant solutions from PLA is much lower than any of the current average dietary lactic acid intake values allowed by several governmental agencies. Thus, PLA is safe for use in fabricating articles for contact with food.

The purpose of this study was to fine-tune the mechanical properties of high molecular-weight poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), especially to increase its toughness without sacrificing too much of its original strength. Besides of its long degradation time, PLLA is usually hard and brittle, which hinders its usage in medical applications, i.e., orthopedic and dental surgery. Some modifications, such as the addition of plasticizers or surfactants/compatibilizers, are usually required to improve its original properties. PDLLA can degrade quickly due to its amorphous structure, thus shortening the degradation time of PLLA/PDLLA blends. Blends of biodegradable poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) and poly-DL-lactic acid (PDLLA) or polycaprolactone (PCL), in addition to a third component, the surfactant-a copolymer of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, were prepared by blending these three polymers at various ratios using dichloromethane as a solvent. The weight percentages of PLLA/PDLLA (or PCL) blends were 100%/0%, 80%/20%, 60%/40%, 50%/50%, 40%/60%, 20%/80% and 0%/100%, respectively. Physical properties such as the crystalline melting point, glass transition point (T(g)), phase behavior, degradation behavior, and other mechanical properties were characterized by thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), infrared spectroscopy, gel permeation chromatography, and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). DSC data indicate that PLLA/PDLLA blends without the surfactant had two T(g)'s. With the addition of the surfactant, there was a linear shift of the single T(g) as a function of composition, with lower percentages of PLLA producing lower glass transition temperatures indicating that better miscibility had been achieved. DMA data show that the 40/60 PLLA/PDLLA blends without the surfactant had high elastic modulus and elongation, and similar results were observed after adding 2% surfactant into the blends. The 50/50 PLLA/PDLLA/2% surfactant blend had the highest elastic modulus, yield strength, and break strength compared with other ratios of PLLA/PDLLA/2% surfactant blends. The elongation at break of 50/50 PLLA/PDLLA was similar to that of PLLA. Again, the elongation at break of 50/50 PLLA/PDLLA/2% surfactant was almost 1.2-1.9 times higher than that of 50/50 PLLA/PDLLA and PLLA. Elongation of PLLA increased with the addition of PCL, but the strength decreased at the same time. In conclusions, adding PDLLA and surfactant to PLLA via solution-blending may be an effective way to make PLLA tougher and more suitable to use in orthopedic or dental applications.