0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effect of laryngeal mask combined with bronchial occluder in patients undergoing single lung ventilation in thoracic surgery: A retrospective study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study evaluates the clinical efficacy of combining a laryngeal mask airway with a bronchial blocker (LMA-BB) in single-lung ventilation (OLV) during thoracic surgery compared to the traditional single-lumen tracheal tube with a bronchial blocker (single-lumen tracheal tube [SLT] + BB). A retrospective analysis was performed on 93 patients undergoing thoracic surgery with OLV from December 2021 to September 2023. After propensity score matching (1:1), 34 patients remained in each group (LMA-BB and SLT + BB). Key outcomes, including airway pressures, ventilation and oxygenation parameters, lung compliance, postoperative recovery, and complications, were compared between groups. After matching, the 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics. The LMA-BB group showed significant advantages in airway pressure management, with lower peak and plateau pressures ( P < .05). Ventilation and oxygenation efficiency were superior in the LMA-BB group, including lower end-tidal carbon dioxide (37.8 ± 4.7 vs 39.2 ± 5.1 mm Hg, P = .04) and higher oxygenation index (255 ± 22 vs 245 ± 28, P = .04). Lung compliance was improved ( P = .018), and more patients in the LMA-BB group achieved excellent lung collapse (76.5% vs 52.9%, P = .032). Additionally, postoperative recovery was faster, with shorter extubation times (12.4 ± 3.2 vs 14.8 ± 3.6 minutes, P = .003) and fewer complications, including hypoxemia (5.9% vs 23.5%, P = .027) and pulmonary issues (8.8% vs 20.6%, P = .046). The LMA-BB technique offers significant clinical benefits over the traditional SLT + BB method in thoracic OLV, including improved airway management, ventilation efficiency, lung compliance, and faster recovery. It also reduces postoperative complications, making it a promising alternative for thoracic surgery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Intubation with VivaSight or conventional left-sided double-lumen tubes: a randomized trial.

          Double-lumen endotracheal tubes (DLTs), which are commonly used for single-lung ventilation during surgery, are difficult to insert. In addition, they often move during surgical lung manipulation which can cause life-threatening complications. Flexible bronchoscopy is used routinely to establish and confirm proper DLT placement. The newly designed VivaSight DLT has an integrated camera, allowing continuous visualization of its position in the trachea. We hypothesized that the time to intubation using the VivaSight DLT would be faster than with a conventional DLT.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Lung isolation in the morbidly obese patient: a comparison of a left-sided double-lumen tracheal tube with the Arndt® wire-guided blocker.

            Obese patients are at risk of complications during airway management including difficult tracheal intubation. There are no reports regarding the ease of intubation or efficiency of lung collapse with the use of lung isolation devices for the morbidly obese patient. We conducted a prospective, randomized study in morbidly obese patients undergoing one-lung ventilation. We compared the effectiveness and ease of placement of a left-sided double-lumen tube and the Arndt(®) blocker. Fifty adult patients undergoing thoracic surgery were randomly assigned to a double-lumen tracheal tube (DLT) or standard single-lumen tracheal tube and an Arndt(®) blocker. The primary endpoint was to record the number of times the tube/devices were successfully positioned at the first attempt and the time spent to achieve optimal position as verified by fibreoptic bronchoscopy. A secondary outcome was the adequacy of lung collapse. For the left-sided DLT group, there were three intubation failures on the first attempt. This group required an alternative method with an airway exchange catheter technique to advance the DLT. In the single-lumen tracheal tube with an Arndt(®) blocker group, there were two intubation failures on the first attempt. After lung isolation devices were placed, lung collapse was clinically comparable in both groups. There is no overall advantage of one device over the other during intubation of the morbidly obese patient.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Lung Isolation for Thoracic Surgery: From Inception to Evidence-Based.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                MD
                Medicine
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0025-7974
                1536-5964
                14 March 2025
                14 March 2025
                : 104
                : 11
                : e41718
                Affiliations
                [a ] Department of Anesthesiology, Chengde Central Hospital, Chengde, Hebei, P.R. China.
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: Jiao Guan, Department of Anesthesiology, Chengde Central Hospital, Chengde, Hebei 067000, P.R. China (e-mail: 19903240345@ 123456163.com ).
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3118-6050
                Article
                MD-D-24-16751 00017
                10.1097/MD.0000000000041718
                11922447
                40101037
                6eb673da-40bf-4705-84ce-6ca5ff1b208e
                Copyright © 2025 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 30 December 2024
                : 11 February 2025
                : 12 February 2025
                Funding
                Funded by: Effects of laryngeal mask combined with bronchial occluder on inflammatory stress indexes and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing thoracoscopic partial pulmonary resection.
                Award ID: 202305B078
                Award Recipient : Not Applicable
                Categories
                5400
                Research Article
                Observational Study
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                airway management,bronchial blocker,laryngeal mask airway,single-lung ventilation,thoracic surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article