Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The interplay of personality and attitudes toward own aging across two decades of later life

      research-article
      1 , * , 2 , 2
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Big Five personality traits are assumed to be linked with attitudes toward own aging. Since both constructs have central importance for the aging process, it is surprising that to our knowledge no study so far comprehensively addressed their mutual connection over time. We used data from the ILSE study, a longitudinal study capturing personality and attitudes toward own aging at four measurement occasions, spanning 20 years and including two participant cohorts in midlife ( n = 501; born 1950–52) and later life ( n = 500; born 1930–32). Dual latent change score models showed that personality was longitudinally related to change in attitudes toward own aging: Lower Neuroticism, higher Conscientiousness, and higher Openness predicted more positive attitudes, whereas the direction of the effect for Extraversion varied by time. Furthermore, the role of personality seems to be confined to certain sensitive periods in midlife and early old age. Contrary to our expectations, attitudes toward own aging had only marginal longitudinal impact on the Big Five. Our results shed light on the developmental co-dynamics of personality and subjective perceptions of aging across the second half of the lifespan.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.

          Principles for reporting analyses using structural equation modeling are reviewed, with the goal of supplying readers with complete and accurate information. It is recommended that every report give a detailed justification of the model used, along with plausible alternatives and an account of identifiability. Nonnormality and missing data problems should also be addressed. A complete set of parameters and their standard errors is desirable, and it will often be convenient to supply the correlation matrix and discrepancies, as well as goodness-of-fit indices, so that readers can exercise independent critical judgment. A survey of fairly representative studies compares recent practice with the principles of reporting recommended here.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Structural equations modeling: Fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A systematic literature review of attrition between waves in longitudinal studies in the elderly shows a consistent pattern of dropout between differing studies.

              Longitudinal studies of the elderly are complicated by the loss of individuals between waves due to death or other dropout mechanisms. Factors that affect dropout may well be similar from one study to another. This article systematically reviews all large population-based studies of the elderly (published 1966-2002) that report on differences in individual characteristics between people who remain and people who dropout at follow-up. A systematic review of articles that investigate attrition after baseline interview. Twelve studies were found that investigated dropout other than death using unadjusted, multivariable methods or both. The unadjusted analyses showed many significant factors related to attrition. Multivariable analyses showed two main independent factors were related to increased attrition: increasing age and cognitive impairment. People who were very ill or frail had higher dropout rates, and people in worse health were less likely to be recontactable. Multivariable methods of analyzing attrition in longitudinal studies show consistent patterns of dropout between differing studies, with a small number of key relationships. These findings will assist researchers when planning studies of older people, and provide insight into the possible biases in longitudinal studies introduced by differential dropout.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                9 October 2019
                2019
                : 14
                : 10
                : e0223622
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
                [2 ] Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
                Aalborg University, DENMARK
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-0812
                Article
                PONE-D-19-17103
                10.1371/journal.pone.0223622
                6785129
                31596876
                6eb5a49b-f737-4001-ace3-77674da24e63
                © 2019 Kornadt et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 17 June 2019
                : 24 September 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 5, Pages: 20
                Funding
                This article reports data from the Interdisciplinary Longitudinal Study of Adult Development and Aging (ILSE). ILSE’s fourth wave of data collection was supported by the Dietmar Hopp Foundation ( https://dietmar-hopp-stiftung.de/die-stiftung/hopp-foundation). Financial support for the previous waves came from the German Federal Ministry for Family, Senior Citizens, Women, and youth (Grant numbers 314-1722-102/16 and 301-1720-295/2) ( https://www.bmfsfj.de/). Funding was received by HWW and others who are not authors on this paper. We are very thankful for this support.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Developmental Biology
                Organism Development
                Aging
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Physiological Processes
                Aging
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Physiology
                Physiological Processes
                Aging
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Personality
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Personality
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Personality
                Personality Traits
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Personality
                Personality Traits
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Personality
                Personality Differences
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Personality
                Personality Differences
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognition
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Longitudinal Studies
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Geriatrics
                Custom metadata
                ILSE has the rule that data are made available only if a written data agreement has been spelled-out between the ILSE steering committee and respective authors / scientists being interested in the data. This agreement follows a certain form and needs the signature by a representative of ILSE as well as the scientist interested in working with the data. As default, the agreement applies to circumscribed portions of data relevant for the respective research question and not the full data set. Given that Hans-Werner Wahl is a member of the ILSE steering committee as well as a co-author of this paper, it can be assured that the ILSE data underlying the present paper can be accessed at any time. We hereby certify that the authors did not have any special access privileges in obtaining the data that others would not have. We hereby also certify that data underlying this article will be made available to any scientist interested in the data based on a written data agreement. Scientists interested in obtaining the data can contact Hans-Werner Wahl ( wahl@ 123456nar.uni-heidelberg.de ) or Christine Hildesheim ( christine.hildesheim@ 123456psychologie.uni-heidelberg.de ).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content296

                Cited by18

                Most referenced authors470