24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Synergy between infection control and antimicrobial stewardship programs to control carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          Argentina is the third country in the world with the higher levels of CRE. The primary objective is to achieve an optimal result in the CRE infection rate after the implementation of an IPC program and antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) in a large teaching hospital in Argentina.

          Methods:

          Retrospective, observational study from January 2018 to December 2021, in a 220-bed tertiary care teaching hospital in Buenos Aires province. Actions aimed at CRE control and prevention included CRE and healthcare-associated infection (HAI) surveillance; compliance with hand hygiene, hospital hygiene, contact isolation precautions, and care bundles for the prevention of device-associated infections; optimization of antimicrobial treatments, antimicrobial consumption, education, and feedback.

          Results:

          Synergy between an ICP and ASP achieved controlled rate of CRE infections reaching the lowest levels during 2020 (0.08 episodes/1000 patient days). Colonization rate remained stable throughout the study period. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) rate showed a trend toward lower rates. Compliance with care bundles showed rates >85%. Antimicrobial consumption increased slightly during the study period (15%). Among high-impact antimicrobials, only colistin consumption increased.

          Conclusion:

          Our study demonstrates the sustained and beneficial impact of an IPC Program and an ASP to control CRE infection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis

          (2022)
          Summary Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a major threat to human health around the world. Previous publications have estimated the effect of AMR on incidence, deaths, hospital length of stay, and health-care costs for specific pathogen–drug combinations in select locations. To our knowledge, this study presents the most comprehensive estimates of AMR burden to date. Methods We estimated deaths and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) attributable to and associated with bacterial AMR for 23 pathogens and 88 pathogen–drug combinations in 204 countries and territories in 2019. We obtained data from systematic literature reviews, hospital systems, surveillance systems, and other sources, covering 471 million individual records or isolates and 7585 study-location-years. We used predictive statistical modelling to produce estimates of AMR burden for all locations, including for locations with no data. Our approach can be divided into five broad components: number of deaths where infection played a role, proportion of infectious deaths attributable to a given infectious syndrome, proportion of infectious syndrome deaths attributable to a given pathogen, the percentage of a given pathogen resistant to an antibiotic of interest, and the excess risk of death or duration of an infection associated with this resistance. Using these components, we estimated disease burden based on two counterfactuals: deaths attributable to AMR (based on an alternative scenario in which all drug-resistant infections were replaced by drug-susceptible infections), and deaths associated with AMR (based on an alternative scenario in which all drug-resistant infections were replaced by no infection). We generated 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) for final estimates as the 25th and 975th ordered values across 1000 posterior draws, and models were cross-validated for out-of-sample predictive validity. We present final estimates aggregated to the global and regional level. Findings On the basis of our predictive statistical models, there were an estimated 4·95 million (3·62–6·57) deaths associated with bacterial AMR in 2019, including 1·27 million (95% UI 0·911–1·71) deaths attributable to bacterial AMR. At the regional level, we estimated the all-age death rate attributable to resistance to be highest in western sub-Saharan Africa, at 27·3 deaths per 100 000 (20·9–35·3), and lowest in Australasia, at 6·5 deaths (4·3–9·4) per 100 000. Lower respiratory infections accounted for more than 1·5 million deaths associated with resistance in 2019, making it the most burdensome infectious syndrome. The six leading pathogens for deaths associated with resistance (Escherichia coli, followed by Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were responsible for 929 000 (660 000–1 270 000) deaths attributable to AMR and 3·57 million (2·62–4·78) deaths associated with AMR in 2019. One pathogen–drug combination, meticillin-resistant S aureus, caused more than 100 000 deaths attributable to AMR in 2019, while six more each caused 50 000–100 000 deaths: multidrug-resistant excluding extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E coli, carbapenem-resistant A baumannii, fluoroquinolone-resistant E coli, carbapenem-resistant K pneumoniae, and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant K pneumoniae. Interpretation To our knowledge, this study provides the first comprehensive assessment of the global burden of AMR, as well as an evaluation of the availability of data. AMR is a leading cause of death around the world, with the highest burdens in low-resource settings. Understanding the burden of AMR and the leading pathogen–drug combinations contributing to it is crucial to making informed and location-specific policy decisions, particularly about infection prevention and control programmes, access to essential antibiotics, and research and development of new vaccines and antibiotics. There are serious data gaps in many low-income settings, emphasising the need to expand microbiology laboratory capacity and data collection systems to improve our understanding of this important human health threat. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and Department of Health and Social Care using UK aid funding managed by the Fleming Fund.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of antibiotic stewardship on the incidence of infection and colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

            The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 17(9), 990-1001
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Current evidence on hospital antimicrobial stewardship objectives: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

              Antimicrobial stewardship is advocated to improve the quality of antimicrobial use. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether antimicrobial stewardship objectives had any effects in hospitals and long-term care facilities on four predefined patients' outcomes: clinical outcomes, adverse events, costs, and bacterial resistance rates.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol
                Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol
                ASH
                Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology : ASHE
                Cambridge University Press (New York, USA )
                2732-494X
                2023
                26 September 2023
                : 3
                : 1
                : e162
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Infection Prevention and Control Department, Hospital Universitario Austral , Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [ 2 ]Department of Phamacy, Hospital Universitario Austral , Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [ 3 ]Microbiology Laboratory, Hospital Universitario Austral , Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [ 4 ]Medical Director, Hospital Universitario Austral , Buenos Aires, Argentina
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Wanda Cornistein; Email: WCORNIST@ 123456cas.austral.edu.ar
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2830-8552
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0020-9296
                Article
                S2732494X23004394
                10.1017/ash.2023.439
                10523542
                37771737
                6e07a828-4c52-40e6-8293-d647e05b44bc
                © The Author(s) 2023

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.

                History
                : 07 December 2022
                : 03 August 2023
                : 07 August 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, References: 23, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Original Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content106

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors836