21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Wealth and urbanization shape medium and large terrestrial mammal communities

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Complexity of coupled human and natural systems.

          Integrated studies of coupled human and natural systems reveal new and complex patterns and processes not evident when studied by social or natural scientists separately. Synthesis of six case studies from around the world shows that couplings between human and natural systems vary across space, time, and organizational units. They also exhibit nonlinear dynamics with thresholds, reciprocal feedback loops, time lags, resilience, heterogeneity, and surprises. Furthermore, past couplings have legacy effects on present conditions and future possibilities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation.

            With increasing urbanization the importance of cities for biodiversity conservation grows. This paper reviews the ways in which biodiversity is affected by urbanization and discusses the consequences of different conservation approaches. Cities can be richer in plant species, including in native species, than rural areas. Alien species can lead to both homogenization and differentiation among urban regions. Urban habitats can harbor self-sustaining populations of rare and endangered native species, but cannot replace the complete functionality of (semi-)natural remnants. While many conservation approaches tend to focus on such relict habitats and native species in urban settings, this paper argues for a paradigm shift towards considering the whole range of urban ecosystems. Although conservation attitudes may be challenged by the novelty of some urban ecosystems, which are often linked to high numbers of nonnative species, it is promising to consider their associated ecosystem services, social benefits, and possible contribution to biodiversity conservation. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity.

              Spatial variation in plant diversity has been attributed to heterogeneity in resource availability for many ecosystems. However, urbanization has resulted in entire landscapes that are now occupied by plant communities wholly created by humans, in which diversity may reflect social, economic, and cultural influences in addition to those recognized by traditional ecological theory. Here we use data from a probability-based survey to explore the variation in plant diversity across a large metropolitan area using spatial statistical analyses that incorporate biotic, abiotic, and human variables. Our prediction for the city was that land use, along with distance from urban center, would replace the dominantly geomorphic controls on spatial variation in plant diversity in the surrounding undeveloped Sonoran desert. However, in addition to elevation and current and former land use, family income and housing age best explained the observed variation in plant diversity across the city. We conclude that a functional relationship, which we term the "luxury effect," may link human resource abundance (wealth) and plant diversity in urban ecosystems. This connection may be influenced by education, institutional control, and culture, and merits further study.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Global Change Biology
                Glob Change Biol
                Wiley
                1354-1013
                1365-2486
                August 17 2021
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Conservation and Science Urban Wildlife Institute Lincoln Park Zoo Chicago Illinois USA
                [2 ]Department of Geographical and Sustainability Sciences University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA
                [3 ]Central Mississippi Research and Extension Center Mississippi State University Raymond Mississippi USA
                [4 ]School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning and School of Sustainability Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA
                [5 ]Department of Environmental Science and Policy George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USA
                [6 ]Tyson Research Center Washington University in St Louis Eureka Missouri USA
                [7 ]Department of Horticulture and Natural Resources Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas USA
                [8 ]Department of Basic Sciences University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St. Louis St. Louis Missouri USA
                [9 ]Arkansas Game & Fish Commission Little Rock Arkansas USA
                [10 ]School of Biological Sciences University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA
                [11 ]Department of Biology Seattle University Seattle Washington USA
                [12 ]College of Integrative Sciences and Arts Arizona State University Mesa Arizona USA
                [13 ]Woodland Park Zoo Seattle Washington USA
                [14 ]Wild Utah Project Salt Lake City Utah USA
                [15 ]Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin Texas USA
                [16 ]Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
                [17 ]Urban Form and Corporate Strategic Development, City Planning, City of Edmonton Edmonton Alberta Canada
                [18 ]Department of Biological Sciences California State University Long Beach California USA
                [19 ]Department of Biology Occidental College Los Angeles California USA
                [20 ]Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy Pasadena California USA
                [21 ]Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California Berkeley Berkeley California USA
                Article
                10.1111/gcb.15800
                34405496
                6de65a57-a4b8-4e35-bf3c-9e760a4a6a0b
                © 2021

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article