3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Postexposure Prophylaxis After Possible Anthrax Exposure: Adherence and Adverse Events

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Anthrax postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) was recommended to 42 people after a laboratory incident that involved potential aerosolization of Bacillus anthracis spores in 2 laboratories at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2014. At least 31 (74%) individuals who initiated PEP did not complete either the recommended 60 days of antimicrobial therapy or the 3-dose vaccine regimen. Among the 29 that discontinued the antimicrobial component of PEP, most (38%) individuals discontinued PEP because of their low perceived risk of infection; 9 (31%) individuals discontinued prophylaxis due to PEP-related minor adverse events, and 10% cited both low risk and adverse events as their reason for discontinuation. Most minor adverse events reported were gastrointestinal complaints, and none required medical attention. Individuals taking ciprofloxacin were twice as likely (RR =2.02, 95% CI =1.1–3.6) to discontinue antimicrobial prophylaxis when compared to those taking doxycycline. In the event anthrax PEP is recommended, public health messages and patient education materials will need to address potential misconceptions regarding exposure risk and provide information about possible adverse events in order to promote PEP adherence.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          101654694
          43672
          Health Secur
          Health Secur
          Health security
          2326-5094
          2326-5108
          24 October 2017
          29 November 2016
          Nov-Dec 2016
          29 November 2017
          : 14
          : 6
          : 419-423
          Affiliations
          Leisha D. Nolen, MD, PhD, is an Epidemic Intelligence Officer, Epidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services, and the Bacterial Special Pathogens Branch, Division of High-Consequence Pathogens & Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Rita M. Traxler, MHS, is an Epidemiologist; Grishma A. Kharod, MPH, is an ORISE Fellow; Pallavi A. Kache is an ORISE Fellow; Stefan Katharios-Lanwermeyer is an ORISE Fellow; Katherine A. Hendricks, MD, MPH&TM, is Medical Officer; Sean V. Shadomy, DVM, MPH, is an Epidemiologist; William A. Bower, MD, is Epidemiology Team Lead; and Henry T. Walke, MD, MPH, is Branch Chief; all in the Bacterial Special Pathogens Branch, Division of High-Consequence Pathogens & Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC, Atlanta. Dana Meaney-Delman, MD, MPH, is Senior Medical Advisor for Preparedness, Office of the Director, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC, Atlanta. The findings and conclusions in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
          Author notes
          Address correspondence to: William A. Bower, MD, Captain, US Public Health Service, Epidemiology Team Lead, Bacterial Special Pathogens Branch, Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, MailStop A30, Atlanta, GA, wbower@ 123456cdc.gov
          Article
          PMC5673259 PMC5673259 5673259 hhspa915020
          10.1089/hs.2016.0060
          5673259
          27898235
          6da9f4a7-e0b0-4381-abf9-04165ab818ac
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Adverse reactions,Anthrax,Medical management/response,Public health preparedness/response,Vaccines

          Comments

          Comment on this article